Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2016, Article ID 2636701, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2636701
Review Article

Metabolism Is Central to Tolerogenic Dendritic Cell Function

1Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138673
2Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76712, USA

Received 7 November 2015; Accepted 31 December 2015

Academic Editor: Jurjen Tel

Copyright © 2016 Wen Jing Sim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Immunological tolerance is a fundamental tenant of immune homeostasis and overall health. Self-tolerance is a critical component of the immune system that allows for the recognition of self, resulting in hyporeactivity instead of immunogenicity. Dendritic cells are central to the establishment of dominant immune tolerance through the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines and regulatory polarization of T cells. Cellular metabolism holds the key to determining DC immunogenic or tolerogenic cell fate. Recent studies have demonstrated that dendritic cell maturation leads to a shift toward a glycolytic metabolic state and preferred use of glucose as a carbon source. In contrast, tolerogenic dendritic cells favor oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation. This dichotomous metabolic reprogramming of dendritic cells drives differential cellular function and plays a role in pathologies, such as autoimmune disease. Pharmacological alterations in metabolism have promising therapeutic potential.

1. Introduction

Immune homeostasis is achieved when there is a balance between immunogenicity to nonself or pathogens and tolerance to self. Amongst many lymphocytes involved, dendritic cells (DCs) play an important role in both the innate and adaptive immune response. DCs originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and contribute to immunity by recognition of pathogenic signals. Upon activation by Toll-like receptor (TLR) binding, DCs migrate from the periphery into lymph nodes during a maturation process. DCs can act as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by efficiently presenting peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC), molecules to antigen-specific T cells which then eliminate pathogens [1]. Protection against pathogenic invasion is important, but it is also critical for immune system to be at the very least nonresponsive to self, a concept known as tolerance. Central tolerance is a deletional process where high affinity reactive T cells are eliminated [2]. Peripheral tolerance is the combination of inducing anergy in self-reactive T cells that escape the thymus and the suppressive action of regulatory T cells [3]. Specific types of DCs, the tolerogenic dendritic cells (tol-DCs), are critical in maintaining tolerance. Defects in self-tolerance play a role in autoimmune diseases and autoinflammatory diseases.

In recent years, cellular metabolism has been identified as a key component in immune cell function. Decades of research have led to the characterization of cellular metabolism as a vast network of biochemical processes important for energy production and cell fate determination [4]. Revolutionary advances in mass spectrometry, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and extracellular flux analysis have opened up the field of immune bioenergetic analysis [5]. Studies have revealed fundamental metabolic differences within human peripheral blood leukocytes and their component subsets [6]. Furthermore, functional activity of these immune cells can be altered with changes in metabolic reprogramming. This review will focus on tol-DCs, metabolic reprogramming by pharmacological agents, and their potential use in the clinic.

2. Immunologic Tolerance

The function of immune system is to defend an organism from pathogenic invasion. Immunologic tolerance refers to an ability to suppress self-reactivity and control the response to prolonged and persistent infection. Tolerance is an active process involving multiple cellular subsets to constantly control self-reactivity. During an ongoing immune response, mechanisms are required to tightly regulate self-reactivity in a spatial and time dependent manner to reduce collateral tissue damage. Breakdown in tolerance results in serious pathology like autoimmune diseases, allergies, and graft rejections. In mammals, tolerance checkpoints occur mechanistically at two levels: centrally and peripherally.

Central tolerance acts as a first line of defence against autoimmunity. The chief mechanism of central tolerance is the deletion of autoreactive T cells in the thymus. This process is aided by thymic DCs and thymic medullary epithelial cells which present self-peptide-MHC complexes to T cells. T cells first undergo positive selection followed by negative selection during T cell development. Under positive selection, T cells with low T cell receptor (TCR) expression or an inability to react with MHC molecules are removed. Any self-reactive T cells are deleted from the T cell repertoire under negative selection when they react strongly with self-peptide-MHC complexes presented on thymic DCs [7, 8]. Despite an effective mechanism of limiting self-reactivity, T cells with moderate or low affinity may survive central tolerance scrutiny and enter the periphery.

Secondary peripheral mechanisms are required to suppress the activation of any remaining autoreactive cells. DCs are crucial in maintaining tolerance in the periphery. Constitutive ablation of all DCs in mice resulted in the development of spontaneous fatal autoimmunity under steady state conditions [9]. DCs are vital to the induction of T cell anergy in which T cells become functionally inactivated following an antigen encounter. In 2002, Bonifaz et al. showed that antigen delivery by anti-DEC-205 antibodies to DC induced CD8+ T cell tolerance [10]. T cell activation requires T cells to first recognize the appropriate MHC-peptide complex followed by costimulatory signals from DCs to proliferate and differentiate. In the absence of costimulatory signals, self-reactive T cells do not proliferate when they encounter self-peptide-MHC complexes and remain unresponsive towards primary and secondary stimulation, inducing T cell anergy. Self-reactive T cell activation may also be suppressed by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Natural Tregs are thymically derived and self-antigen-specific. Upon recognition of their specific antigen, they can broadly suppress nearby effector T cells in a nonspecific manner. Researchers also demonstrated that anti-DEC-205 antibodies targeted to immature DC or peptide-loaded mature DCs are potent inducers of Tregs yielding T cell tolerance, indicating that these cells may be the actual in vivo effectors [3, 11]. Peripheral tolerance is a dynamic multicellular process and plays a key role in keeping autoreactivity under surveillance.

3. Tolerogenic DCs

DCs form a critical link between the innate and adaptive immune systems and their state of maturation determines an immunological or tolerogenic outcome. In the presence of specific signals, immature DCs (iDCs) are differentiated to Th1/2/17/9 or TfH inducing state, while, in response to tolerogenic signals, iDCs are matured toward an alternate, Treg-inducing state [12]. Once generated, these cells integrate peripheral tolerogenic signals and inhibit T cell autoreactivity, thereby promoting peripheral tolerance and maintenance of immune homeostasis.

Tol-DCs can be characterized by their surface markers and cytokine profile. Generally, tol-DCs express lower levels of surface MHC class II and costimulatory molecules relative to immunogenic DC, a state often referred to as “semimature” [2124]. These cells can be further characterized by the specific expression of surface immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) containing receptors such as Fc gamma receptor IIb (CD32b), Ig-like inhibitory receptors (ILT3/ILT4), and paired immunoglobulin-like receptor (PILR) [25]. They also express immunomodulatory molecules like PD-L1 (ligand of programmed death 1) [26], heme oxygenase 1, human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) [27, 28], CD95L, galectin-1 [29], and DC-SIGN (Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Nonintegrin) [12, 30, 31]. Interestingly, a number of genes involved in metabolism seem to play a critical role in tol-DC biology such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), IL-27 [32], and nitric oxide (NO) [12, 31]. The production of immunosuppressive factors including IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b) can contribute to their function by promoting the expansion of Tregs and directly inhibiting T cell response. It is important to note that this phenotype is largely resistant to subsequent activation signals indicating it is not a transient differentiation state.

IL-10 is believed to play a pivotal role in regulating the expression of both immune-inhibitory receptors and cytokines during tolerogenic DC maturation process. A number of studies indicate that IL-10 regulates the expression of ILTs in DCs and monocytes [33, 34]. Treatment of myeloid DCs with exogenous IL-10 displays high levels of ILT3 and ILT4 surface expression [25]. Transduction of ILT3 and ILT4 in DCs results in generation of Foxp3+ Tregs and inhibition of alloproliferation [35]. IL-10 signaling also induces the expression of ILTs orthologue paired PILR-alpha [33, 36]. PILRs block the access of CD8 molecules to MHC-I and it has been demonstrated that PIR-B-deficient DCs result in Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) activation and accelerated graft and tumor rejection [37]. IL-10 is crucial in regulating PD-L1 expression on tol-DCs. Ligation of PD-1/PD-L1 leads to the recruitment of SHP phosphatase which plays an important role in inhibiting T cell response [38, 39]. Exogenous addition of IL-10 in DC culture from normal donor upregulated PD-L1 surface expression, while IL-10 blockade with neutralizing antibody reversed upregulated PD-L1 expression in DCs from tumor patients [40]. Blocking PD-L1/PD-1 signaling pathway augmented HIV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell function in chronic HIV infection [41]. IL-10 has also been shown to upregulate the expression of CD95L [42]. CD95/CD95L mediated apoptosis in T cells is important for the maintenance of peripheral tolerance and termination of an ongoing immune response [43]. IL-10 has also been shown to regulate the expression of IDO, an enzyme of tryptophan catabolism, in tol-DCs. The presence of IL-10 during DC maturation prevented IFN-γ-induced downregulation of IDO, resulting in sustained expression of functional IDO even in mature, IFN-γ-activated DCs [44]. Transduction of IDO gene into DCs suppressed allogeneic T cell proliferation in vitro [45]. IL-10 also regulates the expression of other tolerogenic DC markers, such as HLA-G, Inhibin Beta A (INHBA), Aquaporin 9 (AQP9), and Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule (SLAM) [33], which are believed to be expressed on many tolerogenic DCs. Their functions as related to tolerance induction are unclear at this point.

There are differing opinions on the role of inhibitory cytokine TGF-b in the induction of DC tolerogenic state. An elegant study by Flavell Laboratory using a dominant negative form of TGF-beta receptor II under the control of CD11c promoter (CD11c dnTGFbetaRII) showed that DC homeostasis is independent of TGF-beta signaling [46]. However, subsequent studies show that TGF-b signaling does play a role in DC tolerogenesis. TGF-b1 gene modified bone marrow-derived immature DCs display decreased IL-12 secretion and alloantigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo [47]. Pallotta et al. demonstrated that exogenous addition of TGF-b induces the expression of IDO in DCs, supporting spontaneous tolerogenesis [48, 49]. It has also been shown that TGF-b treatment increased the expression of PD-L1 in DCs, resulting in T cell apoptosis and Treg expansion [50]. Signal transducers mediated the increment in PD-L1 and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) and blockade of STAT3 significantly decrease PD-L1 expression. TGF-b pulsed bone marrow-derived DCs result in a decrease in IL-12p70 production and inhibited allogenic T cells, leading to long-term survival of the graft [51].

Tol-DCs can also be generated ex vivo using several pharmacological agents such as dexamethasone (DEX), rapamycin, vitamin D3, or Vit D3/Dex combination [5254]. These tolerogenic DCs are semimature in phenotype and possess the ability to suppress alloreactive response. DEX is an immunosuppressive glucocorticoid. DEX-polarized tolerogenic DCs are able to inhibit T cell proliferation and cytokine production as well as promote functional Treg expansion [55]. DEX treated DCs decrease expression of costimulatory molecules and increase secretion of IL-10 while decreasing IL-12 [56, 57]. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of the Ser/Thr protein kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and widely used as an anticancer drug and an immunosuppressant. Rapamycin-treated DCs display a reduction in CD40, CD80, and CD86 expression and T cell hyporesponsiveness [58]. Rapamycin pulsed DCs promote the expansion of functional Treg [59]. Vitamin D3 is a pleiotropic hormone, which regulates calcium homeostasis, promoting innate immunity while inhibiting adaptive immunity. Exogenous treatment with Vit D3 results in high expression levels of PD-L1 in DCs, suppressing T cell proliferation [60]. Vit D3 treated DCs induce ILT3 expression and result in ILT3 dependent CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells expansion [61] and alloreactive T cell inhibition [62]. Ligation of Vit D3 to vitamin D receptor (VDR) significantly increases NF-κB promoter binding affinity and inhibits NF-κB expression and activation, promoting tolerogenic DCs [63]. NF-κB inhibitor, BAY 11-7082, and treated DCs display low expression of MHC class II and CD40 molecules and in vivo injection of BAY 11-7082-treated DC induces IL-10 producing CD4+ regulatory T cells [64]. Protein kinase C inhibitors such as bisindolylmaleimide I, GO 6983, and RO 32-0432 inhibit NF-κB activation in DCs, giving rise to tolerogenic DCs [65]. β-catenin activation drives tolerogenic DCs cell fate and it has been shown that disruption of E-cadherin signaling leads to the activation of β-catenin, giving rise to tolerogenic DCs [66]. DC-specific deletion of β-catenin increased proinflammatory cytokine production [67]. Interestingly, all these pathways target different steps in DC differentiation and activation and yet they converge to generate cells with functionally similar characteristics. It is important to determine the underlying biological process driving this common differentiation.

3.1. Metabolism

The role of metabolism in underpinning immune cell function has become an area of active research over recent years. In living organisms, cellular metabolism is critical for the production of energy in the form of ATP, as well as cellular maintenance and proliferation [4]. Glycolysis is a metabolic process that breaks down glucose to rapidly produce ATP. Intermediates of glycolysis can enter the Pentose Phosphate Pathway (PPP), which generates reductive capability and anabolic building blocks. Oxidative products of this pathway can feed back into glycolysis and affect cellular function [68, 69]. In most cells, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) produces the bulk amount of ATP molecules [70]. Otto Warburg has described the shift away from OXPHOS and towards aerobic glycolysis despite the presence of oxygen as the Warburg effect [71]. The shift in cell metabolism can be explained by the requirement for quick biosynthesis in contrast to efficient energy production. A variety of immune cells have been shown to display different metabolic priorities. With recent advances in metabolic analysis including the extracellular flux analyzers, cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) can be determined by generating bioenergetic profiles of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis, respectively [6]. The analysis of peripheral blood from healthy donors shows distinct metabolic profiles in monocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets determined by parameters including basal respiration, ATP-linked respiration, proton leak, reserve capacity, and non-mitochondrial respiration. In these studies, differences in the metabolic priorities of immune cells become apparent. Neutrophils seemingly dedicate most energy production to glycolytic metabolism, lymphocytes mainly use oxidative phosphorylation, and monocytes show a degree of both glycolytic and oxidative pathways [72]. Studies looking at differential metabolic programs in lymphocytes demonstrate the importance of metabolism for immune function. In T cells, metabolism defines the immune response, where memory T cells have been revealed to rely on increased FAO and glucose [73]. The involvement of mitochondria during T helper cell () activation has also become evident. During Ca2+-dependent activation of , an immunological synapse is formed between and APCs. This is associated with a relocalization within the cell structure, bringing mitochondria closer and increasing the influx of Ca2+, indicating mitochondrial involvement in activation [74]. Additionally, Chang et al. have shown the role of T cell metabolism in tumor growth, where a decrease in glycolysis and nutrient availability for T cells fuels tumor progression [75]. The cellular metabolic state dictates downstream function for many immune cells.

3.2. Metabolism in DC

Changes in cellular metabolism are important in many aspects of DC development and function. During DC maturation, the metabolic profile of precursors and differentiating DCs is different, shifting from glycolysis to OXPHOS [76]. Studies show that this involves reactive oxygen species, as well as an increase in expression of mitochondrial respiratory enzymes, ATP content, and antioxidant capacity [77]. Similarly, resting and activated DCs show differences in metabolic priorities. Maturation of DCs by a variety of TLR stimuli initiates specific signaling cascades, which feed into metabolic regulation. The AKT pathway activates Hexokinase 2 to boost glycolysis and the TCA cycle, resulting in increased PPP activity and the formation of citrate for fatty acid synthesis. The NF-κB signaling pathway is also triggered and can cause stress in the endoplasmic reticulum, which stimulates the constitutively active unfolded protein response (UPR) and promotes fatty acid synthesis [76]. Recently, Cubillos-Ruiz et al. revealed that, in tumor-associated DCs, downstream activation of X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1) by UPR and the related production of lipid bodies impede DC antigen-presenting function and effectiveness in initiating T cell responses [78]. With this shift towards glycolysis in activated DCs, glycolytic intermediates can promote PPP which support biosynthesis of nucleotides for increased protein output and the generation of NADPH. Glycolytic intermediates can also enter the TCA cycle and support lipid membrane production and macromolecule biosynthesis [79]. Furthermore, during LPS activation, OXPHOS and FAO are decreased due to the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and inhibition of 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), respectively [71]. Everts et al. show that iNOS can block OXPHOS and NO can shut down mitochondrial function [80]. Therefore, the different metabolic profiles in DCs are a key factor in differential DC functions. This raises the possibility of altering the immune response by influencing DC metabolism for therapeutic purposes in diseases, such as autoimmunity and cancer.

Tol-DCs also show a distinct metabolic profile (Figure 1). In recent studies by Malinarich et al., the expression of metabolic pathway related genes shows fundamental differences within DCs, with a focus on tol-DCs. The studies demonstrate an increased expression of genes related to OXPHOS, especially of electron transport chain complexes II and IV. Additionally, IL-10, a characteristic cytokine of tol-DCs, blocks the shift in metabolism at TLR stimulation to glycolysis and favors OXPHOS [81]. Moreover, high mitochondrial activity and increased ROS production are seen in tol-DCs. This mitochondrial activity is associated with an increase in FAO and the utilization of triglycerides as a carbon source. Inhibition of the pathway leads to a loss of tolerogenic capacity. Inhibition with etomoxir increased responder T cell activation and caused a dramatic decrease in OCR [82]. Similar to resting T cells, the catabolic profile and high-energy demand in tol-DCs may be related to their active suppressive function. Tryptophan breakdown plays a role in peripheral tolerance [83] and the metabolic enzyme arginase-1 has been shown to control DC differentiation in mice [84]. Lying upstream of immune function, the manipulation of DC metabolism may be used for therapeutic purposes.

Figure 1: Differentiation of dendritic cells. Immature dendritic cells (DCs) can mature into either activated, immunogenic DCs that induce /2/17 for T cell function and elimination of pathogens or tolerogenic DCs that induce the expansion of T regulatory cells and T cell unresponsiveness for immune tolerance. Immature DCs mature into immunogenic DC with a shift in metabolism towards glycolysis, which is associated with increasing biomass for effector function. Tolerogenic DC, on the other hand, shifts cellular metabolism towards OXPHOS (oxidative phosphorylation) and favors FAO (fatty acid oxidation). This catabolic and highly energetic profile may be related to energy required for active suppression and protein degradation.
3.3. Pharmacological Manipulation of DC Metabolism for DC Vaccines

Extensive research on long-term graft acceptance led to the identification of tolerogenic myeloid populations including DCs [85]. Many pharmacological agents such as Vit D3, DEX or Vit D3/DEX combination, or rapamycin can be used to generate tol-DCs (Figure 2). Vit D3 induces changes in proteins involved in iron metabolism, TCA cycle, OXPHOS, and the PPP. A recent paper demonstrated that Vit D3 acts synergistically with metformin to increase the activation of AMPK pathway [86]. Being a metabolic sensor, AMPK is able to detect fluctuations in the AMP : ATP ratio. Activation of AMPK inactivates acetyl-CoA carboxylase, releasing the inhibition on carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1). This promotes catabolic metabolism, increasing FAO and OXPHOS [70, 8789]. Pharmacological activation of AMPK signaling also promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, increasing mitochondrial OXPHOS by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator (PGC) 1-α [70, 87]. Resveratrol has been shown to enhance PGC-1α activity and is being used for the induction of tolerogenic DCs [70, 90]. Vit D3 generated tol-DCs are able to suppress TLR-driven activation and glucose consumption [91]. Tolerogenic DCs generated with VDR agonists have been used as DC vaccines in clinical treatment of psoriasis, a Th1 and Th17 cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the skin [13]. Yates et al. demonstrated that infusion of Vit D3 metabolically modified DCs into TCR-Tg RAG−/− mice that accepted a skin transplant resulted in de novo generation of CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs and dominant transplant tolerance. Mice that were previously rendered tolerant not only retained their existing grafts but also accepted fresh grafts indefinitely [14].

Figure 2: Induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells by cytokines and pharmacological agents. Tolerogenic dendritic cells can be induced by TGF-β (transforming growth factor-beta), IL-10 (interleukin-10), and pharmacological agents dexamethasone, BAY 11-7082, vitamin D3, rapamycin, and metformin which regulates dendritic cell metabolism. The induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells leads to an increase in IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase), ILT3 (Ig-like inhibitory receptor 3), PD-L1 (ligand of programmed death 1), IL-10, and TGF-β transcription and expression. The downregulation of Co-SM (costimulatory molecules) on tolerogenic dendritic cells and the subsequent release of IL-10 and ROS (reactive oxygen species) result in the inhibition of T cells alloproliferation and the expansion of Treg (T regulatory cells), inducing tolerance.

Glucocorticoid receptor activation leads to a cascade of anti-inflammatory responses in a variety of immune cells. In DCs, DEX administration regulates the MHC-II antigen presentation pathway and the proteins involved in the response to stress [92, 93]. DEX is able to inhibit the expression of iNOS and NO production, often increased in inflammatory diseases [94]. DCs generated with DEX have been used to minimize allograft rejection. Emmer et al. demonstrated that preinjection of LPS-matured DEX-DCs resulted in prolonged survival of a completely MHC-mismatched heart allograft in the transplant recipient [15]. A combination of Vit D3 and DEX has also been used to generate tol-DCs. These Vit D3/DEX-DCs display a Vit D3 induced metabolic profile and stress response similar to DEX-DCs [52]. These DCs are less sensitive to death by nutrient starvation and have robust antioxidative machinery. It has been shown that Vit D3/DEX generated DCs are more potent in inhibiting allogenic T cell proliferation than Vit D3 or DEX-DCs [95]. Pedersen et al. demonstrated that infusion of Vit D3/DEX treated DCs into CD4+CD25 T cell transfer SCID mice resulted in suppression of colitis [16].

mTOR is a key regulator of glycolysis and anabolic metabolism [96] and its inhibition with rapamycin has been shown to induce catabolic metabolism and the generation of tolerogenic DCs. A number of studies have highlighted the potential of metabolically modified rapamycin-treated DCs in the induction of transplant tolerance. Injection of alloantigen-pulsed RAPA-DC vaccine into mice before transplantation significantly prolonged a full MHC-mismatched organ allograft [17, 97]. More strikingly, when CD4+ T cells from RAPA-DC vaccinated heart-graft recipient mice were adoptively transferred to naïve mice, resistance to transplant rejection could also be transferred [18].

4. Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Induction of full tolerance remains an elusive goal in clinical organ transplantation and in the management of autoimmune diseases. Based on the promising efficacy in animal models, several groups have begun initiating clinical trials of tol-DC vaccination to treat autoimmune diseases. A phase I clinical trial has started using tol-DC vaccines to reduce islet-specific inflammation in type-1 diabetes [19, 98]. Several groups are starting DC vaccination clinical trials for treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using BAY 11-7082-treated DC loaded with citrullinated peptides derived from RA patients [20]. Another DC vaccine trial is underway using autologous DC metabolically modified with dexamethasone and vitamin D3 and loaded with synovial fluid [99]. Cell based tolerogenic DC vaccinations, including those mentioned above, may prove uniquely effective in restoring immune homeostasis in patients with autoimmune disease. To date, there is no published report on clinical trials using tolerogenic DC vaccines in transplantation, but given the great need for novel tolerogenic strategies in this field, studies may be forthcoming.

Most trials to date have used ex vivo modulated DCs for vaccination. Antigen-pulsed DCs treated with pharmacological agents might not reflect the complexity of natural tol-DCs in vivo. It should be noted that, in the clinic, this approach has shown efficacy and has the advantage that these cells can be generated in sufficient amounts for multiple injections. Loading with specific antigens may improve clinical outcome; however, this poses a challenge in diseases with many autoantigens, such as systemic lupus erythematosus. There has been a growing body of work focused on using antibodies to deliver tolerogenic signals directly to DCs in vivo, thereby bypassing the need for ex vivo manipulation and the potential side effects of immunosuppressive drugs [11, 100, 101]. It remains to be seen if the future of tolerogenic DC vaccination lies in this generation of complex biologic targeting molecules.

There is growing evidence that distinct metabolic reprogramming lies at the heart of DC differentiation, acting as a master regulatory switch in determining immunogenic or tolerogenic DC cell fate. Given the broad availability of pharmacologic compounds, which target this axis, metabolically modulated tol-DCs are promising tools for tolerogenic vaccination in the clinic. DC vaccination to prevent or to inhibit immune activation is highly sought after in allergy, autoimmunity, and transplantation medicine. Our understanding of the mechanism to which metabolism regulates cellular processes in DCs is increasing. Evidence from a multitude of animal models strongly demonstrated the efficiency of metabolically modulated tol-DC vaccines in allergic and autoimmune diseases as well as in transplantation (Table 1). However, for DC-based tolerogenic vaccination in man, only a few clinical trials have been performed for inflammatory and autoimmune disorders (Table 1). Future studies are required to identify the important metabolic targets which can be manipulated to induce tol-DCs for vaccination and facilitate their rapid translation to the clinic. Metabolic modification of DCs yielding phenotypically stable tol-DCs with migratory capacity, combining DC vaccines with autoantigens, and timely and accurate delivery of DC vaccines to target sites are all important approaches with potential to further enhance vaccine efficacy.

Table 1: Dendritic cell therapeutics.

Abbreviations

AMPK:5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
APC:Antigen-presenting cell
DCs:Dendritic cells
DC-SIGN:Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Nonintegrin
DEX:Dexamethasone
ECAR:Extracellular acidification rate
FAO:Fatty acid oxidation
HPCs:Hematopoietic progenitor cells
HLA-G:Histocompatibility antigen, class I, G
HPLC:High performance liquid chromatography
IL-10:Interleukin-10
IL-27:Interleukin-27
ILT3:Immunoglobulin-like transcript 3
ILT4:Immunoglobulin-like transcript 4
iDCs:Immature DCs
IDO:Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase
iNOS:Inducible nitric oxide synthase
MHC:Major histocompatibility complex
mTOR:Mammalian target of rapamycin
NO:Nitric oxide
OXPHOS:Oxidative phosphorylation
OCR:Oxygen consumption rate
PBMCs:Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
PD-L1:Ligand of programmed death 1
PPP:Pentose Phosphate Pathway
Tregs:Regulatory T cells
TCR:T cell receptor
:T helper cell
TGF-b:Transforming growth factor-beta
TLR:Toll-like receptors
TNF:Tumor Necrosis Factor
Tol-DC:Tolerogenic DC
TCA:Tricarboxylic Acid
UPR:Unfolded protein response
VDR:Vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor
Vit D3:Vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Agency for Science, Technology and Research Core Funding (to John Edward Connolly).

References

  1. H. Ueno, E. Klechevsky, R. Morita et al., “Dendritic cell subsets in health and disease,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 118–142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Xing and K. A. Hogquist, “T-cell tolerance: central and peripheral,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1–15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Yamazaki, D. Dudziak, G. F. Heidkamp et al., “CD8+CD205+ splenic dendritic cells are specialized to induce Foxp3+ regulatory T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 10, pp. 6923–6933, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Kareva and P. Hahnfeldt, “The emerging ‘hallmarks’ of metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion: distinct or linked?” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 2737–2742, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Guo, A. A. Shestov, A. J. Worth et al., “Inhibition of mitochondrial complex II by the anti-cancer agent lonidamine,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. N. Jones, J. Piasecka, A. H. Bryant et al., “Bioenergetic analysis of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. T. Zal, A. Volkmann, and B. Stockinger, “Mechanisms of tolerance induction in major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T cells specific for a blood-borne self-antigen,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 2089–2099, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Volkmann, T. Zal, and B. Stockinger, “Antigen-presenting cells in the thymus that can negatively select MHC class II-restricted T cells recognizing a circulating self antigen,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 693–706, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Ohnmacht, A. Pullner, S. B. S. King et al., “Constitutive ablation of dendritic cells breaks self-tolerance of CD4 T cells and results in spontaneous fatal autoimmunity,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. 549–559, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Bonifaz, D. Bonnyay, K. Mahnke, M. Rivera, M. C. Nussenzweig, and R. M. Steinman, “Efficient targeting of protein antigen to the dendritic cell receptor DEC-205 in the steady state leads to antigen presentation on major histocompatibility complex class I products and peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 12, pp. 1627–1638, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Mahnke, “Induction of CD4+/CD25+ regulatory T cells by targeting of antigens to immature dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 4862–4869, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. A. Maldonado and U. H. von Andrian, “How tolerogenic dendritic cells induce regulatory T cells,” Advances in Immunology, vol. 108, pp. 111–165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Penna, S. Amuchastegui, G. Laverny, and L. Adorini, “Vitamin D receptor agonists in the treatment of autoimmune diseases: selective targeting of myeloid but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. V69–V73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. F. Yates, A. M. Paterson, K. F. Nolan et al., “Induction of regulatory T cells and dominant tolerance by dendritic cells incapable of full activation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 967–976, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. M. Emmer, J. Van Der Vlag, G. J. Adema, and L. B. Hilbrands, “Dendritic cells activated by lipopolysaccharide after dexamethasone treatment induce donor-specific allograft hyporesponsiveness,” Transplantation, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1451–1459, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. E. Pedersen, E. G. W. Schmidt, M. Gad, S. S. Poulsen, and M. H. Claesson, “Dexamethasone/1α-25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-treated dendritic cells suppress colitis in the SCID T-cell transfer model,” Immunology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 354–364, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Taner, H. Hackstein, Z. Wang, A. E. Morelli, and A. W. Thomson, “Rapamycin-treated, alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce Ag-specific T cell regulation and prolong graft survival,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 228–236, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. R. Turnquist, G. Raimondi, A. F. Zahorchak, R. T. Fischer, Z. Wang, and A. W. Thomson, “Rapamycin-conditioned dendritic cells are poor stimulators of allogeneic CD4+ T cells, but enrich for antigen-specific Foxp3+ T regulatory cells and promote organ transplant tolerance,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 7018–7031, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Giannoukakis, B. Phillips, D. Finegold, J. Harnaha, and M. Trucco, “Phase I (safety) study of autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells in type 1 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2026–2032, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Benham, H. J. Nel, S. C. Law et al., “Citrullinated peptide dendritic cell immunotherapy in HLA risk genotype-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 7, no. 290, Article ID 290ra87, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. P. Verginis, H. S. Li, and G. Carayanniotis, “Tolerogenic semimature dendritic cells suppress experimental autoimmune thyroiditis by activation of thyroglobulin-specific CD4+CD25+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 11, pp. 7433–7439, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X.-J. Yang, S. Meng, Z. Chun-Fu, H. Jiang, and W.-X. Wu, “Semi-mature MyD88-silenced bone marrow dendritic cells prolong the allograft survival in a rat model of intestinal transplantation,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 268–272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B.-M. Fu, X.-S. He, S. Yu et al., “Tolerogenic semimature dendritic cells induce effector T-cell hyporesponsiveness by the activation of antigen-specific CD4+ CD25+ T-regulatory cells,” Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 149–156, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. M. Dudek, S. Martin, A. D. Garg, and P. Agostinis, “Immature, semi-mature, and fully mature dendritic cells: toward a DC-cancer cells interface that augments anticancer immunity,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 438, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. S. Manavalan, P. C. Rossi, G. Vlad et al., “High expression of ILT3 and ILT4 is a general feature of tolerogenic dendritic cells,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 245–258, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. J. Wolfle, J. Strebovsky, H. Bartz et al., “PD-L1 expression on tolerogenic APCs is controlled by STAT-3,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 413–424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Amodio, R. Sales de Albuquerque, and S. Gregori, “New insights into HLA-G mediated tolerance,” Tissue Antigens, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Rebmann, F. D. S. Nardi, B. Wagner, and P. A. Horn, “HLA-G as a tolerogenic molecule in transplantation and pregnancy,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 297073, 16 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. M. Ilarregui, D. O. Croci, G. A. Bianco et al., “Tolerogenic signals delivered by dendritic cells to T cells through a galectin-1-driven immunoregulatory circuit involving interleukin 27 and interleukin 10,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 981–991, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Rémy, P. Blancou, L. Tesson et al., “Carbon monoxide inhibits TLR-induced dendritic cell immunogenicity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 1877–1884, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Li and B. Shi, “Tolerogenic dendritic cells and their applications in transplantation,” Cellular and Molecular Immunology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. D. Mascanfroni, A. Yeste, S. M. Vieira et al., “IL-27 acts on DCs to suppress the T cell response and autoimmunity by inducing expression of the immunoregulatory molecule CD39,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1054–1063, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. W. Velten, K. Duperrier, J. Bohlender, P. Metharom, and S. Goerdt, “A gene signature of inhibitory MHC receptors identifies a BDCA3+ subset of IL-10-induced dendritic cells with reduced allostimulatory capacity in vitro,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2800–2811, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Jung, R. Sabat, J. Krätzschmar et al., “Expression profiling of IL-10-regulated genes in human monocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from psoriatic patients during IL-10 therapy,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 481–493, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Hori, T. Nomura, and S. Sakaguchi, “Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5609, pp. 1057–1061, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Takai, “Paired immunoglobulin-like receptors and their MHC class I recognition,” Immunology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 433–440, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Endo, Y. Sakamoto, E. Kobayashi, A. Nakamura, and T. Takai, “Regulation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte triggering by PIR-B on dendritic cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 38, pp. 14515–14520, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. V. Parry, J. M. Chemnitz, K. A. Frauwirth et al., “CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 21, pp. 9543–9553, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. E. Keir, L. M. Francisco, and A. H. Sharpe, “PD-1 and its ligands in T-cell immunity,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 309–314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. J. Curiel, S. Wei, H. Dong et al., “Blockade of B7-H1 improves myeloid dendritic cell-mediated antitumor immunity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 562–567, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. L. Day, D. E. Kaufmann, P. Kiepiela et al., “PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7109, pp. 350–354, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Schmidt, N. Lügering, H.-G. Pauels, K. Schulze-Osthoff, W. Domschke, and T. Kucharzik, “IL-10 induces apoptosis in human monocytes involving the CD95 receptor/ligand pathway,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1769–1777, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Li-Weber and P. H. Krammer, “The death of a T-cell: expression of the CD95 ligand,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101–103, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. H. Munn, M. D. Sharma, J. R. Lee et al., “Potential regulatory function of human dendritic cells expressing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5588, pp. 1867–1870, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. Terness, T. M. Bauer, L. Röse et al., “Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritic cells: mediation of suppression by tryptophan metabolites,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 447–457, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y. Laouar, F. S. Sutterwala, L. Gorelik, and R. A. Flavell, “Transforming growth factor-β controls T helper type 1 cell development through regulation of natural killer cell interferon-γ,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 600–607, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. Sun, Q. Wang, L. Zhang et al., “TGF-β1 gene modified immature dendritic cells exhibit enhanced tolerogenicity but induce allograft fibrosis in vivo,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 514–523, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. T. Pallotta, C. Orabona, C. Volpi et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a signaling protein in long-term tolerance by dendritic cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 870–878, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. L. Belladonna, C. Volpi, R. Bianchi et al., “Cutting edge: autocrine TGF-β sustains default tolerogenesis by IDO-competent dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 5194–5198, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Song, P. Yuan, H. Wu et al., “Dendritic cells with an increased PD-L1 by TGF-β induce T cell anergy for the cytotoxicity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 117–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. C. Thomas, F. S. Wong, P. Zaccone, E. A. Green, and M. Wållberg, “Protection of islet grafts through transforming growth factor-β induced tolerogenic dendritic cells,” Diabetes, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 3132–3142, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. Nikolic and B. O. Roep, “Regulatory multitasking of tolerogenic dendritic cells—lessons taken from vitamin D3-treated tolerogenic dendritic cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. Hackstein, T. Taner, A. F. Zahorchak et al., “Rapamycin inhibits IL-4-induced dendritic cell maturation in vitro and dendritic cell mobilization and function in vivo,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 4457–4463, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Zimmer, J. Bouley, M. Le Mignon et al., “A regulatory dendritic cell signature correlates with the clinical efficacy of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1020–1030, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Bros, F. Jährling, A. Renzing et al., “A newly established murine immature dendritic cell line can be differentiated into a mature state, but exerts tolerogenic function upon maturation in the presence of glucocorticoid,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3820–3829, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. L. Vieira, P. Kaliński, E. A. Wierenga, M. L. Kapsenberg, and E. C. De Jong, “Glucocorticoids inhibit bioactive IL-12p70 production by in vitro-generated human dendritic cells without affecting their T cell stimulatory potential,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 10, pp. 5245–5251, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. E. Pedersen, M. Gad, M. R. Walter, and M. H. Claesson, “Induction of regulatory dendritic cells by dexamethasone and 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3,” Immunology Letters, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. Fedoric and R. Krishnan, “Rapamycin downregulates the inhibitory receptors ILT2, ILT3, ILT4 on human dendritic cells and yet induces T cell hyporesponsiveness independent of FoxP3 induction,” Immunology Letters, vol. 120, no. 1-2, pp. 49–56, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Battaglia, A. Stabilini, B. Migliavacca, J. Horejs-Hoeck, T. Kaupper, and M.-G. Roncarolo, “Rapamycin promotes expansion of functional CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells of both healthy subjects and type 1 diabetic patients,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 12, pp. 8338–8347, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. W. W. J. Unger, S. Laban, F. S. Kleijwegt, A. R. Van Der Slik, and B. O. Roep, “Induction of Treg by monocyte-derived DC modulated by vitamin D3 or dexamethasone: differential role for PD-L1,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3147–3159, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. Penna, A. Roncari, S. Amuchastegui et al., “Expression of the inhibitory receptor ILT3 on dendritic cells is dispensable for induction of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 3490–3497, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. Penna and L. Adorini, “1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits differentiation, maturation, activation, and survival of dendritic cells leading to impaired alloreactive T cell activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 2405–2411, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. X. Dong, W. Lutz, T. M. Schroeder et al., “Regulation of relB in dendritic cells by means of modulated association of vitamin D receptor and histone deacetylase 3 with the promoter,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 44, pp. 16007–16012, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. E. Martin, B. O'Sullivan, P. Low, and R. Thomas, “Antigen-specific suppression of a primed immune response by dendritic cells mediated by regulatory T cells secreting interleukin-10,” Immunity, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 155–167, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. T. Matsumoto, H. Hasegawa, S. Onishi, J. Ishizaki, K. Suemori, and M. Yasukawa, “Protein kinase C inhibitor generates stable human tolerogenic dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 5, pp. 2247–2257, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. Jiang, O. Bloom, S. Ono et al., “Disruption of E-cadherin-mediated adhesion induces a functionally distinct pathway of dendritic cell maturation,” Immunity, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 610–624, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. S. Manicassamy, B. Reizis, R. Ravindran et al., “Activation of β-catenin in dendritic cells regulates immunity versus tolerance in the intestine,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5993, pp. 849–853, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. F. Weinberg and N. S. Chandel, “Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1177, pp. 66–73, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Haschemi, P. Kosma, L. Gille et al., “The sedoheptulose kinase CARKL directs macrophage polarization through control of glucose metabolism,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 813–826, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. B. Everts and E. J. Pearce, “Metabolic control of dendritic cell activation and function: recent advances and clinical implications,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, article 203, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. B. Kelly and L. A. O'Neill, “Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity,” Cell Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 771–784, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. P. A. Kramer, S. Ravi, B. Chacko, M. S. Johnson, and V. M. Darley-Usmar, “A review of the mitochondrial and glycolytic metabolism in human platelets and leukocytes: implications for their use as bioenergetic biomarkers,” Redox Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 206–210, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. O'Sullivan, G. van der Windt, S.-C. Huang et al., “Memory CD8+ T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Quintana, C. Schwindling, A. S. Wenning et al., “T cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation to the immunological synapse,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 36, pp. 14418–14423, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. C. H. Chang, J. Qiu, D. O'Sullivan et al., “Metabolic competition in the tumor microenvironment is a driver of cancer progression,” Cell, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 1229–1241, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. E. J. Pearce and B. Everts, “Dendritic cell metabolism,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. P. Zaccagnino, M. Saltarella, S. Maiorano et al., “An active mitochondrial biogenesis occurs during dendritic cell differentiation,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1962–1969, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. R. Cubillos-Ruiz, P. C. Silberman, M. R. Rutkowski et al., “ER stress sensor XBP1 controls anti-tumor immunity by disrupting dendritic cell homeostasis,” Cell, vol. 161, no. 7, pp. 1527–1538, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. N. J. MacIver, R. D. Michalek, and J. C. Rathmell, “Metabolic regulation of T lymphocytes,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 259–283, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. B. Everts, E. Amiel, G. J. W. Van Der Windt et al., “Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1422–1431, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. T. Nikolic and B. O. Roep, “Regulatory multitasking of tolerogenic dendritic cells—lessons taken from vitamin D3-treated tolerogenic dendritic cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 113, Article ID Article 113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. F. Malinarich, K. Duan, R. A. Hamid et al., “High mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic capacity represent a metabolic phenotype of human tolerogenic dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 194, no. 11, pp. 5174–5186, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. M. L. Belladonna, U. Grohmann, P. Guidetti et al., “Kynurenine pathway enzymes in dendritic cells initiate tolerogenesis in the absence of functional IDO,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 130–137, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. Q. Yang, J. Wei, L. Zhong et al., “Cross talk between histone deacetylase 4 and STAT6 in the transcriptional regulation of arginase 1 during mouse dendritic cell differentiation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. H. Hackstein and A. W. Thomson, “Dendritic cells: emerging pharmacological targets of immunosuppressive drugs,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. W. Li, Q. Wang, X. Liu et al., “Combined use of vitamin D3 and metformin exhibits synergistic chemopreventive effects on colorectal neoplasia in rats and mice,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. L. A. J. O'Neill and D. Grahame Hardie, “Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation,” Nature, vol. 493, no. 7432, pp. 346–355, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. N. Kudo, A. J. Barr, R. L. Barr, S. Desai, and G. D. Lopaschuk, “High rates of fatty acid oxidation during reperfusion of ischemic hearts are associated with a decrease in malonyl-CoA levels due to an increase in 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 29, pp. 17513–17520, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. L. Abu-Elheiga, M. M. Matzuk, K. A. H. Abo-Hashema, and S. J. Wakil, “Continuous fatty acid oxidation and reduced fat storage in mice lacking acetyl-coa carboxylase 2,” Science, vol. 291, no. 5513, pp. 2613–2616, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. M. Lagouge, C. Argmann, Z. Gerhart-Hines et al., “Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1α,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1109–1122, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Hewison, L. Freeman, S. V. Hughes et al., “Differential regulation of vitamin D receptor and its ligand in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 11, pp. 5382–5390, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. R. Matasić, A. B. Dietz, and S. Vuk-Pavlović, “Dexamethasone inhibits dendritic cell maturation by redirecting differentiation of a subset of cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 909–914, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. L. Piemonti, P. Monti, P. Allavena et al., “Glucocorticoids affect human dendritic cell differentiation and maturation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 6473–6481, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. Korhonen, A. Lahti, M. Hämäläinen, H. Kankaanranta, and E. Moilanen, “Dexamethasone inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production by destabilizing mRNA in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 698–704, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. H. J. Wu, Y. Lo, D. Luk, C. S. Lau, L. Lu, and M. Y. Mok, “Alternatively activated dendritic cells derived from systemic lupus erythematosus patients have tolerogenic phenotype and function,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. P. K. Majumder, P. G. Febbo, R. Bikoff et al., “mTOR inhibition reverses Akt-dependent prostate intraepithelial neoplasia through regulation of apoptotic and HIF-1-dependent pathways,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 594–601, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. R. T. Fischer, H. R. Turnquist, Z. Wang, D. Beer-Stolz, and A. W. Thomson, “Rapamycin-conditioned, alloantigen-pulsed myeloid dendritic cells present donor MHC class I/peptide via the semi-direct pathway and inhibit survival of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. R. J. Creusot, N. Giannoukakis, M. Trucco, M. J. Clare-Salzler, and C. G. Fathman, “It's time to bring dendritic cell therapy to type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. C. M. U. Hilkens and J. D. Isaacs, “Tolerogenic dendritic cell therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: where are we now?” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. D. Li, G. Romain, A.-L. Flamar et al., “Targeting self- and foreign antigens to dendritic cells via DC-ASGPR generates IL-10-producing suppressive CD4+ T cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 109–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. J. Maggi, C. Schafer, G. Ubilla-Olguín, D. Catalán, K. Schinnerling, and J. C. Aguillón, “Therapeutic potential of hyporesponsive CD4+ T cells in autoimmunity,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 6, article 488, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar