Low-Copy Number Polymorphism in DEFA1/DEFA3 Is Associated with Susceptibility to Hospital-Acquired Infections in Critically Ill Patients

Zhao, Jialian; Gu, Qiang; Wang, Lifeng; Xu, Weize; Chu, Lihua; Wang, Ya; Li, Zhongwang; Wu, Shuijing; Xu, Jianguo; Hu, Zhiyong; Shu, Qiang; Fang, Xiangming

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2152650

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Genetics of Infectious Diseases and Immunoinflammatory Disorders

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 2152650 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2152650

Low-Copy Number Polymorphism in DEFA1/DEFA3 Is Associated with Susceptibility to Hospital-Acquired Infections in Critically Ill Patients

Jialian Zhao,¹Qiang Gu,²Lifeng Wang,²Weize Xu,³Lihua Chu,³Ya Wang,²Zhongwang Li,²Shuijing Wu,²Jianguo Xu,³Zhiyong Hu,¹Qiang Shu,³and Xiangming Fang²

Academic Editor: Cynthia C. Cardoso

Received23 Oct 2017

Revised25 Mar 2018

Accepted19 Apr 2018

Published22 May 2018

Abstract

DEFA1/DEFA3, genes encoding human neutrophil peptides (HNP) 1–3, display wide-ranging copy number variations (CNVs) and is functionally associated with innate immunity and infections. To identify potential associations between DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), we enrolled 106 patients with HAIs and 109 controls in the intensive care unit (ICU) and examined their DEFA1/DEFA3 CNVs. DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number ranged from 2 to 16 per diploid genome in all 215 critically ill patients, with a median of 7 copies. In HAIs, DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV varied from 2 to 12 with a median of 6, which was significantly lower than that in controls (2 to 16 with a median of 8, ). Patients with lower DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number (CNV < 7) were far more common in HAIs than in controls (52.8% in HAIs versus 35.8% in controls; ; OR, 2.010; 95% CI, 1.164–3.472). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV combined with clinical characteristics to predict the incidence of HAIs was 0.763 (95% CI 0.700–0.827), showing strong predictive ability. Therefore, lower DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number contributes to higher susceptibility to HAIs in critically ill patients, and DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV is a significant hereditary factor for predicting HAIs.

1. Introduction

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are considered one of the most frequent adverse events that threaten patients’ safety in healthcare settings throughout the world [1–3]. Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are extremely vulnerable to HAIs due to their severe illness status, malnutrition, increased invasive treatments, impaired immune function, and even the contaminated environment [3–5]. Currently, HAIs have become a serious issue in ICUs due to their high morbidity (nearly 15.1–47.9% all over the world), high mortality (27.6% or even higher), prolonged length of hospital stay, and increased economic burden [6], but there are no efficient tools for predicting HAIs. Studies show that among critically ill patients, the immune system undergoes simultaneous activation and suppression, leading to severe and persistent immune dysregulation [7, 8], and ultimately, immune suppression may contribute to increased risk for HAIs.

Defensins are small cationic, amphiphilic, cysteine-rich peptides produced by certain leukocytes and epithelial cells and comprise the front line of innate immune defense against pathogens [9–11]. Among them, α-defensins 1–3, also called human neutrophil peptides 1–3 (HNP1–3), are mainly expressed in neutrophils with antimicrobial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi, and viruses [12, 13]. Besides directly killing pathogens, HNP1–3 also facilitate the activation of adaptive immunity through chemoattracting naive T cells, immature dendritic cells, and monocytes to sites of inflammation [11, 14]. Therefore, HNP1–3 play an important role in the occurrence and development of infections.

DEFA1 and DEFA3, genes that encode HNP1–3, differ by only a single nonsynonymous coding variant within the third exon and are arrayed in a tandem but slightly random pattern of repeats on chromosome 8p23.1, displaying wide-ranging copy number variations (CNVs) [15, 16]. CNVs are defined as deletions, insertions, or duplications of a region of DNA 1 kilobase or larger in length and have significant impacts on genetic variation in the human genome by altering gene dosage, disrupting coding sequences, or perturbing long-range gene regulation [17]. DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number is reportedly correlated with protein levels of HNP1–3 in neutrophils and other expressive sites. In addition, DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV has been associated with inflammation, infection, and several autoimmune diseases [17–20]. However, whether DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV results in individual differences of hereditary susceptibility to HAIs remains uncertain.

In order to verify the association between DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV and HAIs in critically ill patients, we conducted a case-control study of two independent critically ill cohorts of Chinese Han people. We enrolled cases with HAIs and controls without HAIs from three ICUs of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, measured their DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV, and analyzed the function of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV in the pathogenesis of HAIs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Setting, and Patient Identification

The Ethics Committee (2016450) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China) approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient or authorized legal representative. We enrolled critically ill patients with HAIs and controls from the surgical ICU, general ICU, and emergency ICU. Infection was defined as hospital acquired when it originated in the hospital environment and appeared 48 hours or more following admission [21], which was diagnosed based on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria [22]. Exclusion criteria included ages younger than 18 years old, an ICU stay of less than 48 h, immune deficiency including acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), treatment with corticosteroids, chemotherapy, radiation therapy within 4 weeks, or a history of bone marrow or liver transplantation.

Acute Physiology Score (APS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score II (APACHE II) [23], and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [24] scores were obtained in the first 24 h after ICU admission. Diagnosis, any invasive procedures performed within 24 hours, infection sites, culture of pathogens, drug resistance, ICU stays, hospital stays, and 28-day survival were also obtained for further analysis. Multiple infection refers to infection caused by at least two pathogens. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are defined as isolated pathogens with resistance to at least three types of antimicrobial drugs [25].

2.2. Samples and DNA Extraction

DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using peripheral whole blood samples. One milliliter of EDTA-stabilized peripheral whole blood sample was obtained from patients within 24 h after diagnosis of HAIs and controls. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration was measured by spectrophotometry, and samples were stored at −80°C for further analysis.

2.3. CNV Determination by qPCR

A qPCR-based assay was developed to detect DEFA1/DEFA3 genomic DNA copy number using the albumin gene as a reference [26, 27]. CNV was calculated by the △△Ct method, which uses the reference gene copy number to perform linear regression [28]. All qPCR reactions (20 μL) were performed on an iCycler Thermal Cycler instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), containing 1 × iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and 250 nM each of the forward and reverse primers (DEFA1/DEFA3 forward primer, 5-CCGTCCTTCCCTCTAGACTTAGC-3 and reverse primer: 5-GAGCAGATTGCAGCGGACAT-3; albumin forward primer: 5-TATCGACGACTCTTTACCCTGTCA-3 and reverse primer: 5-CCAAAGTCCACACGGAATGC-3). PCR cycling parameters were set as 1 cycle at 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 60 s, and 1 cycle at 99°C for 1 min, followed by a melting curve initiating at 60°C and increasing in 0.05°C increments. DNA analysis was performed in triplicate with starting quantities of 50, 10, and 2 ng/L using five-fold serial dilutions, and CNV was the average of results obtained from the three different DNA concentrations used. Copy number was rounded up or down to the closest integer. Figure 1 was presented to show the original relative copy number before rounding and its finally determined copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number in HAIs and controls was analyzed as a continuous variable [18, 20, 29, 30], and comparison of the medians between the two groups was performed by the Mann–Whitney test. Then, in order to clinically apply, we used the median CNV of all 215 patients as a cutoff and divided it into two categories (CNV < 7 copies and CNV ≥ 7 copies) and performed further comparisons using chi-square test. Also, logistic regression was used to select risk factors and to fit the predictive model on the incidence of HAIs. We used binary logistic regression (forward, LR) with an entry level of 0.05 and an exclusion level of 0.10 to identify predictor variables among clinical covariates and lower DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number (CNV < 7). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficiency of prediction, and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) > 0.75 was considered as good predictive ability. All statistical tests were two sided and performed by SPSS 20.0 software. Differences with a value < 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

From June 1, 2016, to November 30, 2016, 259 critically ill patients were screened for this study, including 117 HAIs patients and 142 controls. In the HAIs group, eleven HAIs patients were excluded from the study due to ICU stays less than 48 hours (), young age (), or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy (). Thirty-three critically ill patients in the control group were excluded as well. Finally, 215 patients were enrolled in the study including 106 HAIs and 109 controls. Detailed information is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Flow chart of inclusion and exclusion criteria in the HAIs and control groups. From June 1, 2016, to November 30, 2016, 259 critically ill patients were screened for the study, including 117 HAIs patients and 142 controls. In the HAIs group, eleven HAIs patients were excluded from the study due to ICU stay of less than 48 hours (), young age (), or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy (), while 33 controls were excluded for less than 48-hour ICU stay (), young age (), or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy ().

Critically ill HAIs and control patients were not significantly different in terms of age or gender. HAIs patients were more often from the emergency department, general ward, and other ICUs () compared with controls, for which the operating room or recovery room was the main source. Disease severity at ICU admission was indicated by APS, APACHE II, and SOFA scores, which were all significantly higher in the HAIs group (). There were dramatic extensions of hospital and ICU stays in patients who developed HAIs (). Furthermore, the 28-day mortality in HAIs patients was higher than that in the control group, although these values did not attain statistical significance. Detailed characteristics of each group are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Infection Characteristics of HAIs Patients

The infection characteristics of patients with HAIs are listed in Table 2. In critically ill patients who contracted HAIs, the main sources of infection were the respiratory tract (72.6%), abdomen (39.6%), bloodstream (21.7%), and urinary tract (7.5%). Gram-negative bacteria were the most prevalent pathogen in HAIs patients (76.4%), while gram-positive bacteria comprised only 23.6%. Fungi were another type of important infectious pathogen that was present. Multiple infections and multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) were extraordinarily common when critically ill patients contracted HAIs, and among them, MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (38.7%) was the most prevalent pathogen.

3.3. Distribution of DEFA1/DEFA3 Copy Number

The copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3 ranged from 2 to 16 per diploid genome across all 215 critically ill patients, with a median of 7 copies. In the HAIs group, the copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3 varied from 2 to 12 copies, with a median number of 6. In patients who did not develop HAIs, the genomic copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3 ranged from 2 to 16, with a median of 8. There were significant differences in the distribution of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV between the two groups (). Details of copy number frequencies in the two groups are shown in Table 3.

Additionally, we categorized patients into two groups based on whether their copy number was less than 7 per genome, which was the median of all 215 critically ill patients included in this study. We found that 52.8% of HAIs had fewer than 7 copies compared with only 35.8% in controls. Critically ill patients with lower DFEA1/DEFA3 CNV (CNV < 7) were associated with an increased risk for HAIs (, odds ratio (OR), 2.010, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.164–3.473).

3.4. HAIs Prediction Based on DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV

Binary logistic regression was used to select covariates from inherent factors, including sex, age, DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV, and clinical characteristics, including APS score, emergency source, presence of tracheal intubation, and deep venous catheterization within 24 h ICU admission. Ultimately, the multivariate logistic regression model included three covariates, namely CNV < 7, APS score, and emergency source, which were significantly independent predictors for HAIs (Table 4). DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number less than 7 was correlated with higher susceptibility to HAIs (OR 3.014, 95% CI 1.609–5.648), and higher APS score and emergency source were associated with an increased risk for HAIs (APS score: OR 1.142, 95% CI 1.081–1.207; emergency source: OR 2.522, 95% CI 1.269–5.012). We used the ROC curve to measure the predictive ability of our model based on the three covariates. As shown in Figure 3, the model showed good predictive ability with an AUROC of 0.763 (95% CI 0.700–0.827).

4. Discussion

Our case-control study demonstrates an association between HAIs and CNV of DEFA1/DEFA3. The distribution of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV in 215 critically ill patents ranged from 2 to 16 per diploid genome, with a median of 7 copies. DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number was significantly lower in HAIs, varying from 2 to 12 copies with a median of 6, compared with 2 to 16 with a median of 8 in controls (). Decreased DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number (CNV < 7) was correlated with an increased risk for HAIs. Lower DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number (CNV < 7) could be used to help predict the incidence of HAIs combined with clinical characteristics (AUROC =0.763, >0.75), indicating the involvement of DEFA1/DEFA3 in the immune response to HAIs.

Consistent with the findings in the present study, DEFA1/DEFA3 has previously been associated with several infectious and inflammatory disease phenotypes. Reduced DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number has been associated with higher susceptibility to recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children with vesicoureteral reflux [20] and HIV infection [31]. Lower DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV may lead to impaired innate defenses and subdued inflammatory signals, which may ultimately be permissive to infections. Interestingly, higher copy numbers of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV have been associated with a risk for severe sepsis [18]. This discrepancy may be due to the diverse effects of defensins in different diseases. In sepsis patients, high levels of HNP1–3 may induce excessively activated inflammatory and autoimmune injury that results in the development of severe sepsis [18].

Our study found that lower copy numbers of DEFA1/DEFA3 are associated with a phenotype of a higher risk for HAIs, suggesting a role for HNP1–3 in innate immunity and adaptive immunity in the development of HAIs. This phenotype can be interpreted as a gene dosage effect, where increased copy numbers of DEFA1/DEFA3 would result in elevated levels of HPN1–3 mRNA and protein [32]. HNP1–3 are primarily stored in the azurophil granules of neutrophils and then released into circulation and infection sites in response to infectious pathogens [33]. In addition, HNP1–3 mediate their effects in a dose-dependent manner [33, 34]. Therefore, lower copy numbers of DEFA1/DEFA3 mean lower levels of HNP1–3 in neutrophils or other expression sites, leading to more fragile functioning of antimicrobial activity and immunity. Ultimately, this results in higher risk for HAIs.

Quantitative PCR is an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the current gold standard to detect CNVs in the genome. Research has shown substantial agreement between qPCR and FISH techniques, indicating qPCR as a viable alternative approach, particularly when starting material is too scarce or cells are too damaged to obtain accurate results from FISH studies [27]. Using quantitative PCR, the copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3 in our study varied from 2 to 16 in critically ill patients, with a median of 7, which is consistent with the finding of the previous studies [17, 18, 20] using the same detection technique. On the other hand, the CNV of DEFA1/DEFA3 varied between 4 and 11 in a sample of 111 control individuals from the UK [15]. This discrepancy may result from the diversities of DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV in different human populations.

Individual differences in HAIs are influenced by hereditary genetic susceptibility of the patients. Previous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) studies have shown that over- or underexpression of immunoinflammatory genes such as TNF-α, interleukin- (IL-) 1, IL-10, IL-8, interferon gamma, and CD14 receptor is related to infection development in hospitals [35, 36]. We have found that decreased CNV of DEFA1/DEFA3 increases susceptibility to HAIs in critically ill patients, which indicates that genetic variation in innate immunity is a risk factor for HAIs. This finding yields new insight into the pathophysiology of HAIs and may lead to novel potential therapeutic modalities.

Several limitations must be acknowledged in the present study. First, we did not test or verify the mRNA and HNP1–3 expression levels in leukocytes, though several previous studies have found proportional correlations between HNP1–3 levels inside neutrophils and copy numbers of DEFA1/DEFA3 [15, 20]. However, other studies failed to reveal this correlation because HNP1–3 proteins are mainly expressed in bone marrow precursors of neutrophils, promyelocytes, and early myelocytes [11, 18, 33]. Multiallelic CNV in the DEFA1/DEFA3 locus needs to be further investigated. Second, patients enrolled into our cohort were all from the Chinese Han population, but DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV may be different in diverse populations. Thus, the relationship between DEFA/DEFA3 CNV and susceptibility to HAIs in other populations remains to be further elucidated. Finally, though we have established a model to predict the incidence of HAIs, a prospective cohort study is warranted to both validate and improve our model.

5. Conclusions

In summary, lower DEFA1/DEFA3 copy number (CNV < 7) is associated with higher susceptibility to HAIs in critically ill patients, indicating that host genetic factors are involved in the development of HAIs. DEFA1/DEFA3 CNV combined with clinical characteristics can predict the incidence of HAIs, which may provide new insights into the pathophysiology of hypersusceptibility to HAIs and lead to new potential therapeutic or prophylactic targets.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Jialian Zhao and Qiang Gu performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Lihua Chu and Ya Wang collected the samples. Weize Xu and Zhongwang Li performed the statistical analyses. Shuijing Wu interpreted the data. Jianguo Xu and Zhiyong Hu participated in writing the manuscript. Xiangming Fang and Qiang Shu revised the manuscript and supervised all steps of this study. Jialian Zhao and Qiang Gu contributed equally to this article.

References

B. Allegranzi, S. B. Nejad, C. Combescure et al., “Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9761, pp. 228–241, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Vincent, D. J. Bihari, P. M. Suter et al., “The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive-care units in Europe - results of the European prevalence of infection intensive-care (eEpic) study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 274, no. 8, pp. 639–644, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Dancer, “Controlling hospital-acquired infection: focus on the role of the environment and new technologies for decontamination,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 665–690, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Allegranzi and D. Pittet, “Healthcare-associated infection in developing countries: simple solutions to meet complex challenges,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1323–1327, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Y. Peleg and D. C. Hooper, “Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 19, pp. 1804–1813, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chacko, K. Thomas, T. David, H. Paul, L. Jeyaseelan, and J. V. Peter, “Attributable cost of a nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study,” World Journal of Critical Care Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Evans, J. Cuschieri, E. E. Moore et al., “Inflammation and the host response to injury, a large-scale collaborative project: patient-oriented research core standard operating procedures for clinical care IX. Definitions for complications of clinical care of critically injured patients,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 384–388, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Vanzant, C. M. Lopez, T. Ozrazgat-Baslanti et al., “Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome after severe blunt trauma,” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kudryashova, R. Quintyn, S. Seveau, W. Lu, V. H. Wysocki, and D. S. Kudryashov, “Human defensins facilitate local unfolding of thermodynamically unstable regions of bacterial protein toxins,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 709–721, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao and W. Lu, “Defensins in innate immunity,” Current Opinion in Hematology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ganz, “Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 710–720, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chu, M. Pazgier, G. Jung et al., “Human α-defensin 6 promotes mucosal innate immunity through self-assembled peptide nanonets,” Science, vol. 337, no. 6093, pp. 477–481, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Salvatore, A. García-Sastre, P. Ruchala, R. I. Lehrer, T. Chang, and M. E. Klotman, “α-Defensin inhibits influenza virus replication by cell-mediated mechanism(s),” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 835–843, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tani, W. J. Murphy, O. Chertov et al., “Defensins act as potent adjuvants that promote cellular and humoral immune responses in mice to a lymphoma idiotype and carrier antigens,” International Immunology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 691–700, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. R. Aldred, E. J. Hollox, and J. A. L. Armour, “Copy number polymorphism and expression level variation of the human alpha-defensin genes DEFA1 and DEFA3,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 2045–2052, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. F. Khan, D. Carpenter, L. Mitchell et al., “Accurate measurement of gene copy number for human alpha-defensin DEFA1A3,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 719, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ai, M. Li, W. Liu et al., “Low α-defensin gene copy number increases the risk for IgA nephropathy and renal dysfunction,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 8, no. 345, article 345ra88, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. X. Chen, M. Hakimi, S. J. Wu et al., “Increased genomic copy number of DEFA1/DEFA3 is associated with susceptibility to severe sepsis in Chinese Han population,” Anesthesiology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1428–1434, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Mehlotra, P. A. Zimmerman, and A. Weinberg, “Defensin gene variation and HIV/AIDS: a comprehensive perspective needed,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 687–692, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Schwaderer, H. Wang, S. Kim et al., “Polymorphisms in α-defensin-encoding DEFA1A3 associate with urinary tract infection risk in children with vesicoureteral reflux,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 3175–3186, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Garner, W. R. Jarvis, T. G. Emori, T. C. Horan, and J. M. Hughes, “Cdc definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 128–140, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Horan, M. Andrus, and M. A. Dudeck, “CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 309–332, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Knaus, E. A. Draper, D. P. Wagner, and J. E. Zimmerman, “APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 818–829, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. -L. Vincent, R. Moreno, J. Takala et al., “The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 707–710, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Fussen and S. Lemmen, “Multidrug resistant bacteria in the intensive care unit,” Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 743–754, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Linzmeier and T. Ganz, “Human defensin gene copy number polymorphisms: comprehensive analysis of independent variation in alpha- and beta-defensin regions at 8p22-p23,” Genomics, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 423–430, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Chillón, C. Jiménez, R. García-Sanz et al., “Quantitative PCR: an alternative approach to detect common copy number alterations in multiple myeloma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 1699–1705, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔC_T method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Cheng, X. J. Zhou, Y. F. Zhao, M. H. Zhao, and H. Zhang, “Alpha-defensin DEFA1A3 gene copy number variation in Asians and its genetic association study in Chinese systemic lupus erythematosus patients,” Gene, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jespersgaard, P. Fode, M. Dybdahl et al., “Alpha-defensin DEFA1A3 gene copy number elevation in Danish crohn’s disease patients,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3517–3524, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Casanova, I. Naval-Macabuhay, F. Garcia et al., “Higher DEFA1A3 gene copy number and alpha-defensins 1–3 secretion by dendritic cells are associated with HIV protection,” Aids Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 29, no. 11, article A87, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. J. Hollox and B. P. Hoh, “Human gene copy number variation and infectious disease,” Human Genetics, vol. 133, no. 10, pp. 1217–1233, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. I. Lehrer and W. Lu, “α-Defensins in human innate immunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 84–112, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. E. Kleschenko, L. P. Karpenko, and F. Villalta, “Effects of human defensin-α₁ on Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes in vitro,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 731–733, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Antonelli and E. Roilides, “Host genetics: deciphering the variability in susceptibility to infections,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1235-1236, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Swanson, G. C. Wood, L. Xu et al., “Developing a gene expression model for predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients: a pilot study,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 8, article e42065, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Jialian Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1007

Downloads

812

Citations