Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2018 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5823823 |

Yu-Lei Gao, Jian-Hua Zhai, Yan-Fen Chai, "Recent Advances in the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis in Sepsis", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2018, Article ID 5823823, 7 pages, 2018.

Recent Advances in the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis in Sepsis

Academic Editor: Soh Yamazaki
Received30 Sep 2017
Accepted22 Jan 2018
Published07 Mar 2018


Sepsis is recognized as a life-threatening organ dysfunctional disease that is caused by dysregulated host responses to infection. Up to now, sepsis still remains a dominant cause of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death among severe condition patients. Pyroptosis, originally named after the Greek words “pyro” and “ptosis” in 2001, has been defined as a specific programmed cell death characterized by release of inflammatory cytokines. During sepsis, pyroptosis is required for defense against bacterial infection because appropriate pyroptosis can minimize tissue damage. Even so, pyroptosis when overactivated can result in septic shock, MODS, or increased risk of secondary infection. Proteolytic cleavage of gasdermin D (GSDMD) by caspase-1, caspase-4, caspase-5, and caspase-11 is an essential step for the execution of pyroptosis in activated innate immune cells and endothelial cells stimulated by cytosolic lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cleaved GSDMD also triggers NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein (NLRP) 3-mediated activation of caspase-1 via an intrinsic pathway, while the precise mechanism underlying GSDMD-induced NLRP 3 activation remains unclear. Hence, this study provides an overview of the recent advances in the molecular mechanisms underlying pyroptosis in sepsis.

1. Introduction

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening pathological alteration to severe condition patients hospitalized in intensive care units. During the past decades, researches have determined a significant increase in the morbidity of sepsis [13]. Despite that a better understanding for the pathophysiology of sepsis has improved the outcome of disease, in-hospital deaths from sepsis still remarkably rise [1, 4]. Besides, the life quality of survivors is evidently impaired, characterized by more physical dysfunction, dementia and/or cognitive defects, higher readmission rates, and even increased long-term mortality [57]. In China, both the morbidity and mortality of sepsis gradually increase with age, irrespective of gender, although male patients exhibit slightly higher age-adjusted morbidity and mortality. The morbidity of sepsis also shows seasonal fluctuations, especially reaching the peak in cold winter. Epidemiological studies demonstrated that the mortality of sepsis reached up to 20.6%, implying that the standardized mortality rate was 79/100,000 every year [8, 9].

During sepsis, immunoinflammatory response when moderately regulated can equip the organism with effective defense against pathogenic microorganism and consequently mild tissue damage, whereas a severe immunoinflammatory dysfunction, especially an excessive proinflammatory dysfunction or immunosuppression, commonly leads to organ dysfunction or secondary infection [2, 3]. Although sepsis has been extensively studied over the past decades, the mechanism underlying the significant pathophysiological alterations remains unclear. Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammasome, an intracellular multiprotein complex, is involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis [10, 11]. The inflammasome triggered pyroptosis in a caspase-1-dependent manner [12, 13]. In sepsis, pyroptosis ruptures the plasma membrane, which results in releases of abundant inflammatory factors [1015]. An obvious deficiency in the number of immunocytes, especially gastrointestinal epithelial cells, dendritic cells (DCs), lymphocytes, and even thymocytes, was observed in both septic animals and patients [16, 17]. Without any effective treatments, septic patients would undergo primary hyperinflammatory responses followed by immunosuppression, that is, immunoparalysis [2]. Recently, extensive studies have been focused on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying immunoparalysis and developing novel strategies to effectively regulate immune homeostasis during sepsis, such as activation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and apoptotic depletion of immunocytes [7, 1820].

Pyroptosis is an inflammatory form of programmed cell death. In general, pyroptosis protects multicellular host organisms against invasive pathogenic bacteria and microbial infections; however, it also causes sepsis and septic shock when overactivated (Figure 1) [15, 2123]. In the 20th century, the discovery of Toll-like receptor- (TLR-) 4 was a key landmark for understanding innate- and specific-immune responses in infectious diseases, especially in sepsis. Unfortunately, these efforts were not adequate in clinical trials due to a lack of efficacy [24, 25]. In 2013, two critical studies explained this discrepancy by demonstrating a noncanonical inflammasome activation pathway independent of TLR-4 but dependent on detection of cytoplasmic LPS through caspase-11 activation [26, 27]. More and more studies suggested that caspase-11 is directly activated by LPS, wherein LPS is bound to the caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD) [2831]. Caspase-11 is considered crucial for organisms to defend against intracellular Gram-negative bacteria, which further established this noncanonical pathway as the primary defense against intracellular bacterial infection. For a long time, caspase-1 activation is identified as the primary step for pyroptosis. Caspase-1, which belongs to the inflammasome-related caspase family, cleaves and facilitates the maturation of prointerleukin- (IL-) 1β into IL-1β [32, 33]. Damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) are released by pyroptotic cells, which contain the matured form of IL-1β. These DAMPs then recruit innate- and specific-immune cells to the infectious lesions. Inflammatory caspases (caspase-1, caspase-4, caspase-5, and caspase-11) are critical for immune defenses [3436]. Caspase-1 is activated by ligands of typical inflammasomes, while other inflammatory caspases directly recognize LPS. Both events force cells to undergo pyroptosis [32, 37, 38]. In spite that the central effects of pyroptosis in immunity and endotoxic shock have been determined, the mechanism underlying pyroptosis induced by inflammatory caspases is still ambiguous. Pyroptosis is mechanistically distinct from other types of cell death.

2. GSDMD Was the Pivotal Substrate of Pyroptosis in Sepsis

The GSDM family contains four paralogs in vertebrates, named as GSDMA, GSDMB, GSDMC, and GSDMD. All GSDM proteins share two predicted domains with a variable linker region, which are distinct from any other known domain structures [26, 27, 39]. In 2015, two studies simultaneously identified GSDMD as the pivotal and direct target of caspase-11 in the noncanonical inflammasomes when stimulated by cytosolic LPS. Kayagaki et al. found that GSDMD was necessary for the formation of caspase-11-mediated pyroptosis and IL-1β secretion. A forward genetic screen established the correlation between Gsdmd and intracellular LPS responses in mice with ethyl-N-nitrosourea- (ENU-) induced dominant negative mutation. Macrophages isolated from gene-targeting-generated Gsdmd−/− mice also escaped from pyroptosis and produced less IL-1β under the stimulation of cytoplasmic LPS or G bacteria (including Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Burkholderia thailandensis, and Shigella flexneri) [39]. In addition, Gsdmd−/− mice were remarkably resistant to LPS, as evidenced by the higher lethal dose. Cleavage products of GSDMD by caspase-11, especially the amino-terminal fragment, determine pyroptosis and NLRP 3-triggered caspase-1 activation [40, 41]. By contrast, using genome-wide clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat- (CRISPR-) Cas-9 nuclease screens of caspase-11 and caspase-1 mediated pyroptosis in mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMDMs) for guide RNAs that prevented LPS-caused death. Shi et al. demonstrated that pyroptosis was obviously abrogated by GSDMD deficiency in cells stimulated with cytosolic LPS and typical inflammasome ligands. Further, IL-1β secretion was also receded in Gsdmd−/− cells even in the presence of caspase-1 [42]. Caspase-1 and caspase-4/5/11 specifically recognized and then cleaved the peptide bonds between the amino- and carboxy-terminal domains in GSDMD, which was the core event in pyroptosis [35, 36, 42].

Gasdermin-N domain was released from intramolecular repressive domain to trigger intrinsic pyroptosis [42]. However, other family members of gasdermin exhibited autoinhibition without being cleaved by inflammatory caspases; genetic mutations in the C-terminal domain of Gsdma3, gain-of-function mutations, blocked the autoinhibition, facilitating gasdermin-N domain-mediated pyroptosis. Thus, several negative effects were caused, among which alopecia and skin defects were the most important [40, 43]. These findings not only provided novel insights into inflammasome-dependent immunity/diseases but also clearly elucidated the difference between pyroptosis and necroptosis. Both research groups found that Gsdmd−/− BMDMs were resistant to LPS-induced pyroptosis and expressed decreased matured IL-1β upon LPS stimulation. Further, they also demonstrated that both Gsdmd−/− and Casp11−/− mice survived from LPS with lethal doses, authenticating the role of GSDMD in pyroptosis-triggered lethal sepsis and septic shock [40, 42].

3. NLRP 3 Inflammasome-Enlarged Pyroptosis in Sepsis

The inflammasome which promotes the maturation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β and IL-18) is a molecular platform in the immunologic system [1013]. The NLRP family members are critical components of inflammasomes, which function through interaction with apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing CARD (ASC) and subsequent recruit of the precursor form of caspase-1 [10, 44]. There are two component pathways that typically activate NLRP 3 inflammasome, that is, the TLR4-ligand pathway and ATP-dependent purinergic receptor pathway [10, 11, 45]. Unlike other inflammasomes, NLRP 3 inflammasome is a highly impressionable factor to both pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and DAMPs. After being stimulated by diverse PAMPs and DAMPs, NLRP 3 recruits ASC and caspase-1, leading to activation of caspase-1, maturation and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, and initiation of pyroptosis [10, 4648].

The role of NLRP 3 inflammasome has been established in various immune and inflammatory diseases [44, 49]. The activation of NLRP 3 inflammasome is important for protecting cells from pathogenic microbes; however, excessive activated NLRP 3 inflammasome may induce hyperinflammation and cause tissue damage, organ failure, and even death [10, 44, 49]. Wu and colleagues established a classic septic model in rats by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and studied the role of NLRP3 in sepsis by injecting rats with Nlrp 3 short hairpin RNA plasmids (Nlrp 3 shRNA). They found that Nlrp 3 knockdown attenuated hyperbileacidaemia through restoration of the abundance of hepatocyte transporters and suppression of the production of hepatic cytokines, neutrophil infiltration, and macrophage pyroptosis during sepsis [49]. NLRP 3 could be a promising molecular target for sepsis treatment. Activation of NLRP 3 inflammasome commonly results in neutrophil infiltration in organs, such as the liver and kidney. The resident macrophages, such as Kupffer cells (KCs) in the liver, undergo pyroptosis in an inflammasome-dependent manner during sepsis, contributing to organ dysfunction [49, 50]. The expression of NLRP 3 was significantly increased in the liver during sepsis [49]. Therefore, NLRP 3 may be a promising target for sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction.

NLRP 3 inflammasome can also be activated by danger signals released from stressed cells or pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria. The dysregulation of NLRP 3 inflammasome activation also causes and aggravates several diseases, especially sepsis [10, 4649]. Therefore, investigating the strategies to limit NLRP 3 inflammasome activation is necessary for human health. Recent studies have indicated that mitochondrial dysfunction was closely correlated with NLRP 3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis during sepsis [5153]. Sepsis causes mitochondrial damage by an unknown mechanism, and the damaged mitochondria release mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) identified as danger signals [54]. Damaged mitochondria in cells treated with NLRP 3 inflammasome activators release enhanced danger signals, especially mtROS and mtDNA [51, 52, 55]. Another study consolidated this concept that increased mtROS and mtDNA were detected in plasma samples of septic patients [54]. The evidence shows that both the NLRP 3 inflammasome and damaged mitochondria contribute to sepsis.

With the pore formation of GSDMD in the presence of caspase-11 when stimulated by LPS, the NLRP 3 inflammasome is activated [4042]. After stimulated by intracellular LPS, the maturation and secretion of IL-1β requires caspase-1, NLRP 3, and ASC, suggesting that NLRP 3 inflammasome activation is engaged by caspase-11 in the presence of LPS stimulation. By contrast, these factors are not required for induction of pyroptosis, implying that the NLRP 3 inflammasome activation occurs after GSDMD cleavage [46, 47, 56]. Indeed, the activation of caspase-1 and the process of IL-1β halted in Gsdmd−/− BMDMs stimulated with intracellular LPS, suggesting that GSDMD mediates NLRP 3 inflammasome activation [40]. It is conceivable that NLRP 3 inflammasome is directly activated by GSDMD-N; however, such a mechanism is difficult to reconcile with the rapid membrane localization and pore formation of GSDMD-N. It is likely that potassium efflux after the pore formation of GSDMD-N triggers the noncanonical activation pathway of NLRP 3 inflammasome.

Autophagy-related (Atg) genes are indispensable regulators of autophagy by controlling the induction and formation of autophagophore under stress or poor nutrient conditions [57, 58]. Atg 7 is homologous to the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 (Uba1) in the two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems, which is essential to these conjugation systems and indispensable for both selective and nonselective autophagy inductions in innate immunity [15, 57, 59]. Recently, by i.p. challenge with P. aeruginosa, Pu and her colleagues showed that Atg7 was involved in inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in the septic model. Atg7fl/fl mice showed impaired pathogen clearance, decreased survival, and widespread dissemination of bacteria into blood and organs, such as the lung. Loss of Atg7 increased production of IL-1β and pyroptosis, which was consistent with enhanced inflammasome activation [15]. These results provided new insights into the function of Atg7 in host defense during bacterial sepsis.

Previous studies showed that autophagy played specific roles in degrading intracellular pathogens in a cell-autonomous manner and orchestrating systemic immunoinflammatory responses by regulating the immune system and inflammation [57]. Silence of Atg genes caused heavier bacterial burdens of macrophages, and deletion of Atg genes in plants and Drosophila increased viral replication, mortality, and more severe pathological phenotypes [60, 61]. Knockout of Atg7 increased tissue injury and inflammatory responses, especially maturation and secretion of IL-1β and activation of pyroptosis [15]. Atg7 linked the immune cross-talk between autophagy and pyroptosis pathways in bacterial infection, particularly in P. aeruginosa-induced septic progression.

The NLRP 3 inflammasome is activated during P. aeruginosa-induced sepsis, while silencing the NLRP 3 inflammasome in macrophages impedes the clearance of P. aeruginosa, which might be attributed to the weakened autophagy flux [61]. Noteworthily, IL-1β stimulation diminished the lethality of macrophages to P. aeruginosa, which, however, was restored by Atg7 knockdown [15]. Cathepsin B (CTSB) induced by Atg7 improved the impairment of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, which was markedly abolished by NLRP 3 deficiency in pancreatic INS-1 (823/13) cells. Therefore, NLRP 3 inflammasome could be identified as an autophagic component [6264]. Combined together, CTSB arouses Atg7-induced NLRP 3-dependent proinflammatory responses. Pu and her colleagues demonstrated that multiple types of inflammasomes with diverse functions can be activated during sepsis [15]. The interrelationship between autophagy and pyroptosis pathways is complicated and can be affected by various elements, including pathogens, actuation duration, host defense capability, and animal models [15, 64]. Hence, Atg7 deletion may contribute to enhanced pyroptosis, and the molecular mechanism underlying bacterial infection and sepsis progression should be further studied. Knockout of Atg16L1 led to increased amounts of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18) in the presence of LPS stimulation. Other researches showed that disordered autophagy was associated with the activation of proatherogenic inflammasomes, which promoted atherosclerosis in part through inflammasome hyperactivation [65, 66]. Likewise, in Pu and her colleagues’ study, they observed overproduction of IL-1β and intensified pyroptosis in septic atg7fl/fl mice. Particularly, transfection of flagellin into atg7fl/fl macrophages also led to inflammasome hyperactivation, suggesting that autophagy could regulate the host immune response to flagellin via an unknown mechanism [15]. This study primarily focused on the role of immune cells in inflammasome activation, which can be a hot topic of future researches on sepsis.

5. Conclusions

Studies from the last several years have propelled our understanding of pyroptosis and its signaling pathways. There is now clear evidence to conclude that pyroptosis protects multicellular host organisms against invaded pathogenic bacteria and microbial infections; however, it also causes sepsis and septic shock when overactivated. Biochemical and structural studies have identified new components and regulators of the pyroptosis in sepsis. DAMPs are released by pyroptotic cells and then recruit innate- and specific-immune cells to the infectious lesions. Binding between a single entity of ligand and an inflammasome sensor can induce a cascade of oligomerization events, culminating in pyroptosis, which define the physiologic outcomes in the host. Therefore, further studies unraveling the molecular basis of pyroptosis activation at a structural and biochemical level would inform translational studies.


MODS:Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
GSDMD:Gasdermin D
NLRP 3:NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3
DCs:Dendritic cells
Tregs:Regulatory T cells
TLR:Toll-like receptor
CARD:The caspase activation and recruitment domain
DAMPs:Damage-associated molecular pattern molecules
CRISPR:Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat
BMDMs:Bone marrow macrophages
ASC:Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing CARD
PAMPs:Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
CLP:Cecal ligation and puncture
MtROS:Mitochondria release mitochondrial reactive ROS
CTSB:Cathepsin B.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Yu-Lei Gao and Jian-Hua Zhai contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81701931), the TMUGH funding (nos. ZYYFY2015012, ZYYFY2015020, and ZYYFY2014014), and the Rui-E funding (no. 2016020). The authors thank professor Shu-Zhang Cui of the Emergency Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital for the guidance in experimental design.


  1. D. F. Gaieski, J. M. Edwards, M. J. Kallan, and B. G. Carr, “Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1167–1174, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. M. Kaukonen, M. Bailey, D. Pilcher, D. J. Cooper, and R. Bellomo, “Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 372, no. 17, pp. 1629–1638, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y.-L. Gao, M.-M. Yu, S.-T. Shou et al., “Tuftsin prevents the negative immunoregulation of neuropilin-1highCD4+CD25+regulatory T cells and improves survival rate in septic mice,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 49, pp. 81791–81805, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. J. Walkey, T. Lagu, and P. K. Lindenauer, “Trends in sepsis and infection sources in the United States. A population-based study,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. D. Winters, M. Eberlein, J. Leung, D. M. Needham, P. J. Pronovost, and J. E. Sevransky, “Long-term mortality and quality of life in sepsis: a systematic review,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1276–1283, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. H. Cuthbertson, A. Elders, S. Hall et al., “Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis,” Critical Care, vol. 17, no. 2, article R70, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Herrán-Monge, A. Muriel-Bombín, M. M. García-García et al., “Epidemiology and changes in mortality of sepsis after the implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines,” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, article 088506661771188, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Zhou, H. Tian, X. Du et al., “Population-Based Epidemiology of Sepsis in a Subdistrict of Beijing,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1168–1176, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Cheng, Z. Li, J. Wang et al., “Comparison of the performance between sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in ICUs in China: a retrospective multicenter study,” Shock, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 301–306, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Bordon, “Mucosal immunology: inflammasomes induce sepsis following community breakdown,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 400-401, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. J. Kim, S. H. Bae, J. C. Ryu et al., “SESN2/sestrin2 suppresses sepsis by inducing mitophagy and inhibiting NLRP3 activation in macrophages,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1272–1291, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Medzhitov, “Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7164, pp. 819–826, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Guo, J. B. Callaway, and J. P. Ting, “Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 677–687, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Wang, E. R. Ko, J. J. Gilchrist et al., “Human genetic and metabolite variation reveals that methylthioadenosine is a prognostic biomarker and an inflammatory regulator in sepsis,” Science Advances, vol. 3, no. 3, article e1602096, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Q. Pu, C. Gan, R. Li et al., “Atg7 deficiency intensifies inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in Pseudomonas sepsis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 198, no. 8, pp. 3205–3213, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. S. Boomer, K. To, K. C. Chang et al., “Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure,” JAMA, vol. 306, no. 23, pp. 2594–2605, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. J. Darcy, G. Minigo, K. A. Piera et al., “Neutrophils with myeloid derived suppressor function deplete arginine and constrain T cell function in septic shock patients,” Critical Care, vol. 18, no. 4, article R163, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Chang, C. Svabek, C. Vazquez-Guillamet et al., “Targeting the programmed cell death 1: programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway reverses T cell exhaustion in patients with sepsis,” Critical Care, vol. 18, no. 1, article R3, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y.-L. Gao, B. Lu, J.-H. Zhai et al., “The parenteral vitamin C improves sepsis and sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome via preventing cellular immunosuppression,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2017, Article ID 4024672, 12 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Albertsmeier, N. J. Prix, H. Winter, A. Bazhin, J. Werner, and M. K. Angele, “Monocyte-dependent suppression of T-cell function in postoperative patients and abdominal sepsis,” Shock, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 651–656, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Pfalzgraff, L. Heinbockel, Q. Su, K. Brandenburg, and G. Weindl, “Synthetic anti-endotoxin peptides inhibit cytoplasmic LPS-mediated responses,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 140, pp. 64–72, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. A. Aglietti and E. C. Dueber, “Recent insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying pyroptosis and gasdermin family functions,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 261–271, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. F. Esquerdo, N. K. Sharma, M. K. C. Brunialti et al., “Inflammasome gene profile is modulated in septic patients, with a greater magnitude in non-survivors,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 232–240, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Nüsslein-Volhard and E. Wieschaus, “Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila,” Nature, vol. 287, no. 5785, pp. 795–801, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Hashimoto, K. L. Hudson, and K. V. Anderson, “The Toll gene of drosophila, required for dorsal-ventral embryonic polarity, appears to encode a transmembrane protein,” Cell, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 269–279, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. A. Hagar, D. A. Powell, Y. Aachoui, R. K. Ernst, and E. A. Miao, “Cytoplasmic LPS activates caspase-11: implications in TLR4-independent endotoxic shock,” Science, vol. 341, no. 6151, pp. 1250–1253, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. Kayagaki, M. T. Wong, I. B. Stowe et al., “Noncanonical inflammasome activation by intracellular LPS independent of TLR4,” Science, vol. 341, no. 6151, pp. 1246–1249, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Shi, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang et al., “Inflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS,” Nature, vol. 514, no. 7521, pp. 187–192, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. A. Napier, S. W. Brubaker, T. E. Sweeney et al., “Complement pathway amplifies caspase-11–dependent cell death and endotoxin-induced sepsis severity,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 213, no. 11, pp. 2365–2382, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Dolunay, S. P. Senol, M. Temiz-Resitoglu et al., “Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome prevents LPS-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia in mice: contribution of NF-κB, Caspase-1/11, ASC, NOX, and NOS isoforms,” Inflammation, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 366–386, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. M. Man, R. Karki, B. Briard et al., “Differential roles of caspase-1 and caspase-11 in infection and inflammation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 45126, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. M. Man, R. Karki, and T. D. Kanneganti, “Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 61–75, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. E. A. Miao, I. A. Leaf, P. M. Treuting et al., “Caspase-1-induced pyroptosis is an innate immune effector mechanism against intracellular bacteria,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1136–1142, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. G. Ghonime, O. R. Shamaa, R. A. Eldomany, M. A. Gavrilin, and M. D. Wewers, “Tyrosine phosphatase inhibition induces an ASC-dependent pyroptosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 425, no. 2, pp. 384–389, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Z. Hu, T. Murakami, K. Suzuki et al., “Antimicrobial cathelicidin peptide LL-37 inhibits the LPS/ATP-induced pyroptosis of macrophages by dual mechanism,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 1, article e85765, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. Tonnus and A. Linkermann, “The in vivo evidence for regulated necrosis,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 128–149, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. L. M. Thurston, S. A. Matthews, E. Jennings et al., “Growth inhibition of cytosolic Salmonella by caspase-1 and caspase-11 precedes host cell death,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, article 13292, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. J. G. Eldridge, J. Sanchez-Garrido, G. F. Hoben, P. J. Goddard, and A. R. Shenoy, “The atypical ubiquitin E2 conjugase UBE2L3 is an indirect caspase-1 target and controls IL-1β secretion by inflammasomes,” Cell Reports, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1285–1297, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Tamura and T. Shiroishi, “GSDM family genes meet autophagy,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 469, no. 2, pp. e5–e7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Kayagaki, I. B. Stowe, B. L. Lee et al., “Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling,” Nature, vol. 526, no. 7575, pp. 666–671, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. A. Aglietti, A. Estevez, A. Gupta et al., “GsdmD p30 elicited by caspase-11 during pyroptosis forms pores in membranes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 28, pp. 7858–7863, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Shi, Y. Zhao, K. Wang et al., “Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death,” Nature, vol. 526, no. 7575, pp. 660–665, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Qiu, J. Liu, and F. Xing, “'Hints' in the killer protein gasdermin D: unveiling the secrets of gasdermins driving cell death,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 588–596, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Lee, K. Nakahira, J. Dalli et al., “NLRP3 Inflammasome deficiency protects against microbial sepsis via increased Lipoxin B4 synthesis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 713–726, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. S. Karthikeyan, S. M. Leal Jr., N. V. Prajna et al., “Expression of innate and adaptive immune mediators in human corneal tissue infected with Aspergillus or Fusarium,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 942–950, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. C. Gonçalves, L. S. Ferreira, F. A. Manente et al., “The NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to host protection during Sporothrix schenckii infection,” Immunology, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 154–166, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. P. V. Borges, K. H. Moret, N. M. Raghavendra et al., “Protective effect of gedunin on TLR-mediated inflammation by modulation of inflammasome activation and cytokine production: evidence of a multitarget compound,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 115, pp. 65–77, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Liston and S. L. Masters, “Homeostasis-altering molecular processes as mechanisms of inflammasome activation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 208–214, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Y. Wu, J. Ren, B. Zhou et al., “Gene silencing of non-obese diabetic receptor family (NLRP3) protects against the sepsis-induced hyper-bile acidaemia in a rat model,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 277–293, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. G. Boaru, E. Borkham-Kamphorst, L. Tihaa, U. Haas, and R. Weiskirchen, “Expression analysis of inflammasomes in experimental models of inflammatory and fibrotic liver disease,” Journal of Inflammation, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 49, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. Li, H. Zhihong, L. Wenlong et al., “The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain–like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 inflammasome regulates bronchial epithelial cell injury and proapoptosis after exposure to biomass fuel smoke,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 815–824, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Xi, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu et al., “Caspase-1 inflammasome activation mediates homocysteine-induced pyrop-apoptosis in endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 1525–1539, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Z. Hoseini, F. Sepahvand, B. Rashidi, A. Sahebkar, A. Masoudifar, and H. Mirzaei, “NLRP3 inflammasome: its regulation and involvement in atherosclerosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 233, no. 3, pp. 2116–2132, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. X. Yao, D. Carlson, Y. Sun et al., “Mitochondrial ROS induces cardiac inflammation via a pathway through mtDNA damage in a pneumonia-related sepsis model,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, article e0139416, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. L. R. Hoyt, M. J. Randall, J. L. Ather et al., “Mitochondrial ROS induced by chronic ethanol exposure promote hyper-activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,” Redox Biology, vol. 12, pp. 883–896, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. L. Vyleta, J. Wong, and B. E. Magun, “Suppression of ribosomal function triggers innate immune signaling through activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 5, article e36044, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. T. Shibutani, T. Saitoh, H. Nowag, C. Münz, and T. Yoshimori, “Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in the immune system,” Nature Immunology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1014–1024, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. W. Keller and J. D. Lünemann, “Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in CNS autoimmunity,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, p. 165, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. T. K. Chang, B. V. Shravage, S. D. Hayes et al., “Uba1 functions in Atg7- and Atg3-independent autophagy,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1067–1078, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. D. Lenz, E. Haller, E. Melzer et al., “Autophagy differentially controls plant basal immunity to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens,” The Plant Journal, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 818–830, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. Ye, S. Tan, X. Zhou et al., “Inhibition of p-IκBα ubiquitylation by autophagy-related gene 7 to regulate inflammatory responses to bacterial infection,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 212, no. 11, pp. 1816–1826, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Li, L. Du, L. Zhang et al., “Cathepsin B contributes to autophagy-related 7 (Atg7)-induced Nod-like receptor 3 (NLRP3)-dependent proinflammatory response and aggravates lipotoxicity in rat insulinoma cell line,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 42, pp. 30094–30104, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. P. Kankkunen, E. Välimäki, J. Rintahaka et al., “Trichothecene mycotoxins activate NLRP3 inflammasome through a P2X7 receptor and Src tyrosine kinase dependent pathway,” Human Immunology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. H. Yang, H. Wang, S. S. Chavan, and U. Andersson, “High mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1): the prototypical endogenous danger molecule,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 21, Supplement 1, pp. S6–S12, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Brickle, H. T. Tran, R. Lim, S. Liong, and M. Lappas, “Autophagy, which is decreased in labouring fetal membranes, regulates IL-1β production via the inflammasome,” Placenta, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1393–1404, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. N. Ngoh, H. K. Brugger, M. Monajemi et al., “The Crohn’s disease-associated polymorphism in ATG16L1 (rs2241880) reduces SHIP gene expression and activity in human subjects,” Genes & Immunity, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 452–461, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Yu-Lei Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.