Review Article

Applicability of Plant Extracts in Preclinical Studies of Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Table 3

Bias analyses (ARRIVE) of the studies using plant extracts for the treatment of melanoma in murine models.
(a)

Kato et al., 1998 [19]Xiaoguang et al., 1998 [20]Dai et al., 2001 [21]Nam et al., 2003 [22]Baral and Chattopadhyay, 2004 [23]Leyon and Kuttan, 2004 [24]Yoo et al., 2004 [25]Duong Von Huyen et al., 2006 [26]Jiménez-Medina et al., 2006 [27]Sheeja et al., 2006 [28]Sunila and Kutan, 2006 [29]Xu et al., 2006 [30]Agrawal and Jain, 2009 [31]Agrawal and Pandey, 2009 [32]Harhaji Trajković et al., 2009 [33]Kwon et al., 2009 [34]Youn et al., 2009 [35]Agrawal and Beohar, 2010 [36]

Title
 Accurate and concise description of the content of the article
Abstract
 Summary of the background, objectives, methods, principal findings, and conclusions
Introduction
 Background
 Objectives
Materials and methods
Ethical statement
 Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions and relevant licenses
Study design
 Number of experimental and control groups
 Any steps taken to minimize the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment
 The experimental unit
Experimental procedures
 Doses
 Method of administration
 Choose of dose
Experimental animals
 Origin of animal
 Species
 Sex
 Developmental stage
 Weight
Housing and husbandry
 Housing
 Husbandry conditions
Sample size
 Specify the total number of animals used in each experiment
 Explain how the number of animals was decided
Allocating animals to experimental groups
 How animals were allocated to experimental group (AZAR)
Experimental outcomes
 Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed
Statistical methods
 Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis
 Specify the unit of analysis for each dataset
 Describe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach
Results
Baseline data
 For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals before treatment or testing
Numbers analyzed
 Report the number of animals in each group included in each analysis
 If any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why
Outcomes and estimation
 Report the results for each analysis carried out
Adverse events
 Give details of all important adverse events in each experimental group
 Describe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse events
Discussion
Interpretation/scientific implications
 Interpret the results, taking into account the study objectives and hypotheses, current theory, and other relevant studies in the literature
 Comment on the study limitations including any potential sources of bias
Generalizability/translation
 Comment on whether, and how, the findings of this study are likely to translate to other species or systems, including any relevance to human biology
Funding
 List all funding sources
 Results (%)65.740.068.662.951.457.145.754.365.757.160.057.151.465.774.368.657.162.9

(b)

Kwon et al., 2010 [37]Seki and Maeda, 2010 [38]Wang, et al., 2010 [39]Khoobchandani et al., 2011 [40]Monga et al., 2011 [41]Prabhu and Guruvayoorappan, 2012 [42]Rajasekar et al., 2012 [43]De Oliveira et al., 2013 [44]Lee et al., 2013 [45]Shathish and Guruvayoorappan, 2013 [46]Strüh et al., 2013 [47]Krifa et al., 2014 [48]Son et al., 2014 [49]Wang et al., 2014 [50]Dudek et al., 2015 [51]Jang et al., 2015 [52]Bao et al., 2017 [53]% of items reported

Title
 Accurate and concise description of the content of the article88.5
Abstract
 Summary of the background, objectives, methods, principal findings, and conclusions51,4
Introduction
 Background94.3
 Objectives100.0
Materials and methods
Ethical statement
 Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions and relevant licenses71,4
Study design
 Number of experimental and control groups88.5
 Any steps taken to minimize the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment37,1
 The experimental unit97.1
Experimental procedures
 Doses94.3
 Method of administration94.3
 Choose of dose17.1
Experimental animals
 Origin of animal97.1
 Species100.0
 Sex71.4
 Developmental stage91.4
 Weight51.4
Housing and husbandry
 Housing62.8
 Husbandry conditions80.0
Sample size
 Specify the total number of animals used in each experiment80.0
 Explain how the number of animals was decided0.0
Allocating animals to experimental groups
 How animals were allocated to experimental group (AZAR)37.1
Experimental outcomes
 Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed88.5
Statistical methods
 Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis88.5
 Specify the unit of analysis for each dataset85.7
 Describe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach31.4
Results
Baseline data
 For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals before treatment or testing5.7
Numbers analyzed
 Report the number of animals in each group included in each analysis45.7
 If any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why11.4
Outcomes and estimation
 Report the results for each analysis carried out91.4
Adverse events
 Give details of all important adverse events in each experimental group17.1
 Describe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse events2.8
Discussion
Interpretation/scientific implications
 Interpret the results, taking into account the study objectives and hypotheses, current theory, and other relevant studies in the literature82.8
 Comment on the study limitations including any potential sources of bias8,5
Generalizability/translation
 Comment on whether, and how, the findings of this study are likely to translate to other species or systems, including any relevance to human biology8.5
Funding
 List all funding sources65.7
 Results (%)65.745.760.068.674.365.757.160.062.960.057.168.674.371.465.754.368.6