Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2018, Article ID 7219732, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7219732
Review Article

Impact of Aging in Microglia-Mediated D-Serine Balance in the CNS

1Departamento de Neurología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
2Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Correspondence should be addressed to Jaime Eugenín; lc.hcasu@ninegue.emiaj and Rommy von Bernhardi; lc.cup.dem@bnovr

Received 9 June 2018; Revised 19 August 2018; Accepted 30 August 2018; Published 27 September 2018

Academic Editor: Marcella Reale

Copyright © 2018 Sebastián Beltrán-Castillo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A mild chronic inflammatory state, like that observed in aged individuals, affects microglial function, inducing a dysfunctional phenotype that potentiates neuroinflammation and cytotoxicity instead of neuroprotection in response to additional challenges. Given that inflammatory activation of microglia promotes increased release of D-serine, we postulate that age-dependent inflammatory brain environment leads to microglia-mediated changes on the D-serine-regulated glutamatergic transmission. Furthermore, D-serine dysregulation, in addition to affecting synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity, appears also to potentiate NMDAR-dependent excitotoxicity, promoting neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. D-serine dysregulation promoted by microglia could have a role in age-related cognitive impairment and in the induction and progression of neurodegenerative processes like Alzheimer’s disease.

1. Introduction

Microglia are the main innate immune effector cells of the brain and the main generator of inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species in the central nervous system (CNS) [13]. It is debated whether microglia have a beneficial or a deleterious role under pathological conditions. In pathological conditions, a large spectrum of beneficial microglial phenotypes releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors that contribute to tissue repair and neuroprotection against injury or infections can be found. However, they coexist with noxious microglial phenotypes that release reactive oxygen species, proteinases, and inflammatory cytokines contributing to neuronal damage [4]. Moreover, microglial activation under physiological conditions, in addition to promote the removal of noxious stimuli and the activation of reparative mechanisms, has also the potential of modifying D-serine levels.

D-serine is a dextro amino acid, which is a coagonist of the glycine strychnine-insensitive site of the glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) [5, 6], found in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia [711]. Increased levels of D-serine can potentiate glutamate transmission, increasing synaptic activity on one hand, but it potentially can also facilitate glutamate-induced excitotoxicity on the other.

Aging is associated with morpho-functional changes in neurons and glial cells. Changes in the activation and regulation of microglia can promote a chronic inflammatory state [12] in the CNS. Aged microglia show cellular, molecular, and functional differences compared with microglia from young individuals, including morphological changes suggesting they are activated even under nonstimulated conditions [13], elevated basal levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL6) and IL1β [14, 15], and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [16]. They have also a decreased ability to upregulate the phagocytosis of β-amyloid (Aβ) in response to inflammatory stimulus [1719] and an impaired regulation of their inflammatory activation that depends on changes of transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) signaling [16].

Here, we describe evidence that aged microglia can promote D-serine dysregulation in the CNS and discuss how the imbalance between D-serine and other regulatory mechanisms can result in glutamate and D-serine-mediated impairment of synaptic plasticity and neurodegeneration, which can result in cognitive impairment. Those mechanisms could be involved in neurodegenerative diseases in which aging is the main risk factor, such as late onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) [12].

2. D-Serine in the CNS

D-serine has emerged as a novel regulatory factor giving a new twist to glutamatergic transmission and how aging can affect it. D-serine is an effective agonist of the strychnine-insensitive glycine site of the glutamate NMDAR [5, 20] detectable at substantial quantities in the rat brain tissue [21], exhibiting a brain distribution similar to that of NMDAR [22], and showing age-dependent changes in its anatomical distribution closely correlated with that of NMDAR [23].

In the CNS, D-serine is found in astrocytes, radial glial cells, neurons, and in quiescent and activated microglia [711]. D-serine is synthetized by isomerization of L-serine, in a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme serine racemase [24, 25], which, in addition to synthesize D-serine, also catalyzes the α,β-elimination of water from L-serine or D-serine to produce pyruvate and ammonia [26] (Figure 1). D-serine is preferentially degraded through oxidation by the enzyme D-amino acid oxidase [27] and also by the serine racemase-mediated water α,β-elimination induced by elevated intracellular D-serine levels [26] (Figure 1). Serine racemase is expressed by many CNS cells, including pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ergic medium-spiny neurons in the striatum, cerebellar GABAergic Purkinje cells [28], vestibular nuclei neurons [29], astrocytes from the caudal medulla oblongata [11], telencephalon, and the CA1 region of the hippocampus [22], and neurons and astrocytes from the retina [30, 31]. However, which cells are the principal source of D-serine release in the CNS is still controversial [32, 33]. The predominant source appears to depend on the CNS area, function, developmental stage, and inflammatory state [7, 8, 11, 31, 34, 35].

Figure 1: D-serine synthesis and degradation. D-serine is synthetized by isomerization of L-serine in a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme serine racemase which, in addition, also catalyzes the α,β-elimination of water from L-serine or D-serine to produce pyruvate and ammonia. Although serine racemase also has the potential to degrade D-serine through α,β-elimination of water, it is preferentially degraded through oxidation by the enzyme D-amino acid oxidase, generating hydroxypyruvate, peroxide, and ammonia.

The “serine neuron-astrocytes shuttle” hypothesis explains the relation of D-serine synthesis in neurons and astrocytes. Here, on the one hand, neuronal D-serine production requires the production of L-serine by astrocytes because the enzyme 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase that catalyzes the synthesis of L-serine from glucose is localized almost exclusively in astrocytes [3638]. On the other hand, neuronal D-serine is released from neurons by depolarization and it is uptake and stored by astrocytes, until D-serine is required for modulating the glutamatergic NMDA transmission [39]. However, this hypothesis does not consider alternative sources of D-serine like microglia, in which both serine racemase and D-serine are also found. In fact, activation of microglia by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the amyloid precursor protein (APP), and amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) induces the upregulation of serine racemase and increases the release of D-serine [7, 35]. The mechanism of D-serine release by microglia is still unclear, whereas D-serine release by astrocytes has been explored and includes Ca2+- and SNARE-dependent exocytosis, as well as other nonexocytic mechanisms, such as volume-regulated anion channels (VRAC), alanine–serine–cysteine transporter (ASCT), and gap junction hemichannels [11, 4048].

D-serine participates in multiple processes, including synaptic plasticity [5, 49], cell migration, synaptogenesis [22, 50], and in homeostatic functions, as a mediator of hypercapnia-induced respiratory response [11]. D-serine production and release appear to be closely regulated, and its concentration kept in a narrow range. Dysregulation of D-serine may lead to pathology. Abnormally increased levels of D-serine are associated with NMDAR-mediated neurotoxicity [9, 51, 52], whereas abnormally decreased levels are associated with impairments in functional plasticity and memory deficits [53]; as we will discuss later.

3. Function of Microglia in the CNS

Microglia are highly plastic cells and can respond to a broad spectrum of stimuli, which includes infection, ischemia, inflammation, cell death, trauma, and toxins [54]. Activated microglia change their morphology and their functional properties, generating ROS, nitric oxide (NO∙) [55], and several inflammatory and regulatory cytokines, including interleukin 10 (IL10), IL1β, IL6, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and interferon γ (IFNγ) [12, 15, 16, 5660] in addition to D-serine [7, 34]. Microglia activation promotes changes in the environment, affecting the function of neighbor cells. On bases of functional properties, a wide activation spectrum has been characterized for microglia, similar to that described for macrophages [61]. Two phenotypic extremes are recognized: the M1-like profile, corresponding to cells that are very proinflammatory and have poor phagocytic activity, and the M2-like profile, evidenced by cells that are anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and show a robust phagocytic activity [61]. The M2-like profile microglia are most frequently induced under homeostatic conditions through immunomodulation by astrocytes and neurons [62]. In contrast, a shift from a M2-like to a M1-like profile is often observed in several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [63].

TGFβ1 signaling mediates, at least in part, the immunomodulation of microglia by neurons and astrocytes [19, 64, 65]. TGFβ1 plays a relevant neuroprotective role, attenuating and restricting the duration of neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity [64, 65]. The neuroprotective effect of TGFβ1 is mainly mediated by the activation of the Smad pathway (TGFβ canonical signaling) in microglia, which decreases the release of proinflammatory cytokines, ROS, and NO∙ [60, 64] and promotes phagocytosis and Aβ clearance by microglia [66]. However, TGFβ1 activates also non-Smad-dependent signaling pathways, including MAPKs (ERK, P38, and JNK) and PI3K [60, 67, 68]. With exception of the ERK pathway, which under certain conditions activates neuroprotective effects [69], the activation of signaling mediated by the other MAPKs and PI3K potentiates neuroinflammatory activation [12]. Therefore, microglia play an important role of protection against infection and repair of the damage produced by injury of the CNS. However, they must accomplish their action under the modulation exerted by neurons and astrocytes through an adequate functional signaling.

3.1. Participation of Microglia on D-Serine Regulation

D-serine levels are not homogeneous among different CNS areas. The level of D-serine is in the order of 200–300 pmoles per milligram of tissue in the hippocampus, frontal cortex, and cerebellum, 20-fold higher than in the pancreas, lung, or testis and almost 100-fold higher than in muscle [70]. In the hippocampus, D-serine and serine racemase are predominantly observed in the neuron-rich pyramidal cell- and in the granule cell-layers [71]. A neuronal tonical release of D-serine [71] that maintains a concentration of free D-serine at around 0.3 μM [70] allows synaptic potentiation and plasticity. However, in mice models of hippocampal synaptic damage secondary to trauma (controlled cortical impact: CCI), a switch between neuron and astrocyte production is observed: serine racemase is downregulated in neurons and upregulated in astrocytes [71]. Thus, the content of D-serine is reduced in neurons, but it is increased in astrocytes. The CCI-induced enhancement of D-serine release from astrocytes is detrimental for synaptic potentiation and plasticity [71].

We propose that microglia are also contributing to the increase of free D-serine as consequence of their activation by inflammatory stimuli. Thus, in addition to releasing pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [72], microglia activation also induces the release of excitatory amino acids, including glutamate and D-serine [34, 35, 73]. The levels of serine racemase are increased in response to Aβ peptide, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or secreted amyloid precursor protein (sAPP), associated with an increased expression of serine racemase [34, 35]. The amount of D-serine released by these stimuli can be neurotoxic for hippocampal neurons in culture [7].

3.2. Microglia Impairment in Aging

Aging is a normal dynamic process in life, characterized by the development of a mild inflammatory environment in the organism and a progressive deterioration of some physiological functions, largely attributable to the loss or dysfunction of cells, even in the absence of overt disease [74]. This deterioration and loss of function also affects the CNS, where it is particularly dramatic [75, 76] and can include impairments in behavior, cognitive ability, learning, and memory [77]. Aging is also associated with changes in the immune system in a phenomenon known as immunosenescence [78]. Immunosenescence is induced by cumulative low-level inflammation, which induces changes in gene expression related to immune response and inflammation [79, 80], resulting in an exacerbated inflammatory response against stressors, which could facilitate the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases [8183]. The aged or “senescent” microglia show exacerbated reaction to minor injuries or mild stimuli, with a potentially damaging response [60], generating cytotoxicity and promoting neurodegenerative changes [12]. Unlike young microglia, aged microglia show increased production of ROS and inflammatory cytokines, with decreased NO production [19], decreased ability to phagocytose Aβ [17], and reduced LPS- or TGFβ-induced Aβ phagocytosis by microglia [19]. Those facts led us to reconsider the real role of Aβ in AD pathology, changing our focus from the “amyloid cascade hypothesis” in which Aβ accumulation is the pathogenic cause of AD, and neuroinflammation is its consequence [8486], to the “glial dysfunction hypothesis” [60, 82]. In the “glial dysregulation hypothesis”, the genesis of AD is placed at the dysfunction of the innate immune response associated with chronic neuroinflammation and aging [82, 87, 88].

Dysfunction of microglia can result, at least partly, in deregulation of TGFβ1 signaling, one of the main regulatory cytokines in the brain [89]. The neuroprotective regulation of microglia activity by TGFβ1 is mediated mainly by the activation of Smad3 and, to a lesser extent, by activation of ERK [69, 90]. In addition, TGFβ1-activated PI3K and MAPK signaling could potentiate neuroinflammation [12]. A reduced activation of TGFβ1-Smad3 signaling in microglia has been reported in 12-month-old adult mice compared with juvenile mice [19, 60], regardless of the fact that TGFβ1 levels are elevated at that age. In fact, elevated levels of TGFβ1 has been reported in AD patients [91, 92]. The reduced response of microglia to TGFβ-Smad3 modulation could contribute to maintain a chronically activated microglia, increasing cytotoxicity and impaired uptake of Aβ [82, 93]. Thus, impairment of the innate immune response associated with aging-related changes in regulatory signaling could be the cause, and not a consequence, for the onset of neurodegenerative processes.

4. Role of D-Serine in CNS Development and CNS Levels in Aging

D-serine level in the CNS changes during development and aging. At early development stages, a transient increase on NMDAR activity [94] matches with a transient rush of D-serine production. Healthy newborn children have an elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) D-serine level that is rapidly reduced during the first year of life and reaches 15% of the initial concentration at 3 years of age [95]. The elevated level of D-serine at early age has been associated with brain development, and its deficit is associated with alterations of normal brain development program. For example, 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase deficient children show a severe but treatable disorder of serine synthesis, characterized by microcephaly, psychomotor retardation, and seizures [96]. Prenatal treatment with D-serine allows a nearly normal CSF D-serine level and an adequate clinical phenotype at birth [95].

D-serine has been also described in the development of the rat vestibular nuclei because it is a model of the vestibular plasticity mediated by glutamatergic AMPA and NMDAR neurotransmission observed in the posttrauma vestibular compensation [97]. Here, high expression of serine racemase and increased levels of D-serine are detected mainly in glial cells from birth until P21, with a peak at P7. After P21, both D-serine and serine racemase are reduced in glial cells at the vestibular nuclei, and high content of D-serine switches from glial cells to neuronal cell bodies and dendrites mostly because of an increased expression of glial D-amino acid oxidase at mature stages [29]. The early postnatal period with high D-serine level in glia coincides with a period of intense plasticity, synaptogenesis, and maturation at the vestibular nuclei, suggesting the existence of distinct functional roles for D-serine throughout development.

In other brain areas, D-serine level decreases in aging, and its reduction is associated with age-related memory impairment [98]. In the hippocampus of 24–29-month-old rats, both D-serine and serine racemase levels are decreased [8, 99]. In contrast, in a model of healthy aging like the Lou/C/Jall rat strain that preserves its cognitive function, D-serine and serine racemase levels are not affected by aging [100]. The preservation on memory and the resistance to age-related long-term potentiation (LTP) deficit [101, 102] observed in old Lou/C/Jall rats have been associated to their preference for low-calories food [103]. The caloric restriction reduces the generation of reactive oxygen species [104, 105], which in turn contributes to avoid the induction of a proinflammatory environment that favors the functional impairment of microglia [12]. As part of their functional impairment, the microglia-related dysregulation of D-serine [7, 34, 35] contributes to neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment [106].

The decrease of D-serine during aging has been also associated with an increase on mitochondrial carboxylate pyruvate enzyme expression impairing the modulation of NMDAR by D-serine secreted by astrocytes [98] and to the reduction of serine racemase expression in the hippocampus [99]. As mentioned for the vestibular nuclei, the levels of D-amino acid oxidase, the enzyme that degrades D-serine, can change in various brain areas during aging [107] and, therefore, affect D-serine level. In dementia patients, the severity of the cognitive deficit can be correlated with increased D-amino oxidase blood level [108].

How much of the changes in D-serine level during aging are determined by microglial cell actions has not been elucidated. However, we speculate that age-dependent changes on microglia regulation results in neuroinflammation and increased oxidative stress, which in turn activate production of D-serine by astrocytes and neurons [33, 71, 109112]. Thus, aging on the one hand can promote overactivation of glutamatergic by increased D-serine level and on the other result in impaired activation. We will further discuss these mechanisms in the next section.

4.1. How Age-Related Impairment of Microglia Can Result in D-Serine Dysregulation

Both abnormally increased and decreased levels of D-serine are potentially deleterious for brain function. Although a reduction of D-serine levels has been preferentially reported [98] and associated with cognitive impairment in normal aging, we propose that persistent inflammatory activation of microglia in pathological aging leads to abnormally increased levels of free D-serine that may generate glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity [9, 51, 52] and impairment of the glutamate and D-serine-mediated plasticity. The resulting neurocognitive deficit contributes to the emergence of neurodegenerative changes. During aging, inflammation promotes changes in microglial regulation, increasing their reactivity and favoring a cytotoxic in contrast to a neuroprotective environment [12]. As mentioned in previous sections, modifications on the D-serine-mediated glutamatergic transmission associated with aging include changes in the expression of serine racemase and D-amino acid oxidase as well as in D-serine content. Serine racemase and D-serine are detectable in quiescent and increase when microglia are activated [34, 35]; the proinflammatory brain environment observed in aged individuals will stress overactivated or dysfunctional microglia, further promoting the production and release of gliotransmitters and neurotransmitters, including D-serine, by astrocytes and neurons [110112].

The age-dependent changes in microglial TGFβ signaling could also contribute to D-serine dysregulation because of molecular elements shared by TGFβ signaling and serine racemase regulation [34, 113115]. One is the Protein Interacting with C Kinase-1 (PICK1), a scaffold protein that plays a role in controlling the traffic of multiple membrane receptors and acts as a regulator of phagocytosis and oxidative stress in microglia [116, 117]. Elevated levels of TGFβ promote the activation of PICK1, promoting the internalization, ubiquitination, and degradation of the TGFβ1 receptor (TGFβR1) through a caveolin-dependent pathway, reducing the activation of the Smad-dependent pathway [113]. PICK1 also interacts with serine racemase [114], being a tag for PKCα activity in the reduction of serine racemase activity by phosphorylation in astrocytes and neurons [115]. Interestingly, imbalance among several PICK1 partners has been associated with induction of neurodegenerative diseases [118]. Another common element is Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which is involved in noncanonical TGFβ signaling. In inflammation induced by LPS, activation of JNK phosphorylates c-JUN, activating the activator protein 1 (AP-1) and inducing the expression of the serine racemase gene [34]. The fact that the activation of JNK is part of TGFβ activation raises the possibility that serine racemase expression can be regulated at least partly by TGFβ. In addition, TGFβ and D-serine also have a functional relationship in synaptogenesis.

4.2. D-Serine in Synaptogenesis

During embryonic development, astrocytes release TGFβ that activates TGFβR1, inducing the release of D-serine by astrocytes and neurons. The released D-serine participates in the induction of synaptogenesis in cortical neurons in culture [50]. The synaptogenic effect induced by TGFβ in cortical neurons is abolished by D-amino acid oxidase reduction of endogenous D-serine or serine racemase knockdown with specific short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), suggesting a direct relationship between D-serine-mediated and TGFβ-induced synaptogenesis [50].

In CNS development, D-serine shapes synaptogenesis and neuronal circuitry through activation of NMDAR. D-serine is a key player in astrocyte-mediated LTP associated with hippocampal plasticity [119]. This role is particularly important at early stages, where an elevated concentration of D-serine [95, 120] encounters a transient elevated activity of NMDAR [94]. In murine P19 cells, an embryonic carcinoma cell line that can be differentiated to resemble neurons with functional glutamatergic receptors [121], D-serine induces synaptogenesis and serine racemase is very active [122]. D-serine released by astrocytes acts also as a chemokine for migration of granule cells in the cerebellum [123], and, at embryonic and early postnatal development, its decrease compromised the adequate lamination of the cerebellar cortex [124].

The loss of astrocyte function induced by sodium fluoroacetate, a selective metabolic inhibitor of astrocytes, reduces LTP in the hippocampus and impairs learning and memory in adult rats but can be rescued by D-serine supplementation [125]. Finally, as mentioned above, the decrease of D-serine levels in aging, in special that released by astrocytes, is associated with age-related memory impairment [98]. These results, together with those showing the maintenance of serine racemase and D-serine levels in healthy aging models [126], suggest a pivotal role of D-serine in the induction and conservation of synapses. The role of D-serine in synaptogenesis is likely to remain active, although less robust than in prenatal development, into adulthood and beyond because the shaping of neural networks continues throughout life.

Microglia participate actively in synaptic regulation through various mechanisms. They participate in the formation of filopodia in somatosensory cortex by direct contact with dendrites [127], in synaptic pruning in the retinogeniculate system through CR3/C3-dependent phagocytic signaling [128], and in the formation of learning-dependent synapses in mice through brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [129]. In addition, a microglial-dependent mechanism for synaptogenesis or synapsis pruning involving glutamate-D-serine-NMDAR signaling cannot be ruled out.

4.3. D-Serine as Inductor of Neurodegeneration

D-serine may promote NMDAR-dependent excitotoxicity, and overactivation of NMDAR can induce cell death [130], playing a role in neurodegeneration. However, NMDAR is also pivotal in neural plasticity. The localization hypothesis of NMDAR function proposes that functional outcomes are determined by NMDAR localization: whereas NMDARs localized outside synapses play a role in neurotoxicity; those localized in synapses would promote plasticity [131, 132]. Although extra synaptic and synaptic NMDARs are gated by different endogenous coagonists, glycine acting at extra synaptic NMDARs and D-serine at synaptic NMDARs [133], D-serine appears to be the dominant coagonist in NMDAR-mediated neurotoxicity in the hippocampus. This specific distribution opens the possibility to develop therapies to reduce the excessive activation of extra synaptic NMDAR. However, this segregation is not absolute. Both the long-term depression (which also contributes to plasticity) and the NMDAR-dependent excitotoxicity depend on the magnitude and duration of synaptic and extra synaptic activation of NMDAR [133, 134]. On the other hand, a probable contribution of D-serine from other sources, such as the microglia in the brain, has not been considered into the hypothesis.

During ischemia, microglia are activated and the extracellular concentration of D-serine increases in the cerebral cortex [135], promoting neuronal death mediated by NMDAR overactivation. Neuronal death can be avoided by reducing the endogenous D-serine by inducing D-amino acid oxidase [52, 136]. Similarly, D-serine synthesis and release by astrocytes and microglia [7, 34, 35] are increased at early inflammation stages in the spinal cord [137]. In addition, systemic inflammation generated by streptozotocin treatment contributes to diabetic retinopathy in Sprague-Dawley rats, inducing type I diabetes mellitus, neurodegeneration of the retinal ganglion cell layer associated with excitotoxity mediated by NMDAR overactivation [138], elevated expression of serine racemase in the retina, and a significant elevation of glutamate and D-serine levels in aqueous humor [139]. Interestingly, the neurodegeneration of the retina could be attenuated by the suppression of serine racemase activity [140]. Therefore, we can speculate that under inflammatory conditions, such as those induced by trauma, infection, or ischemia, microglia or other cells activated by them could increase the levels of free D-serine, promoting an uncontrolled activation of synaptic and extra synaptic NMDAR and inducing neuronal damage. Similarly, in aged individuals, the basal inflammatory conditions could facilitate the abnormal NMDAR activation.

4.4. D-Serine Level in AD

A postmortem study comparing D-serine level in the brain parenchyma from AD patients with nondemented individuals showed that AD patients had 2-, 3-, and 5-fold more D-serine in the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and CSF, respectively [141]. Those results support the notion that neurobehavioral deficit at early stages of AD could depend on the impairment in synaptogenesis and functional plasticity mediated by D-serine, and later in the progression of the disease, on NMDAR-activated neurotoxicity. However, other studies report only mild increases in D-serine level in the CSF and frontal cortex from patients with AD or with Lewy bodies dementia [142, 143] or even a slight decrease in D-serine level in the serum of patients with this pathology [144]. These controversial results may depend on differences in the stage of progression of the disease.

Diagnosis of AD is done when damage is advanced. Nevertheless, the cognitive impairment observed in AD patients could depend, at least partly and in early stages, on impairments in synaptogenesis and functional plasticity and only later in damage depending on NMDAR-mediated neurotoxicity and promotion of neuronal death mediated by D-serine.

5. Concluding Remarks

In this work, we have discussed the physiological roles of D-serine in the brain and how it may contribute in the induction of neurodegenerative changes. We discussed how chronic inflammation may promote changes in microglial activation and regulation, promoting their increased reactivity, and a cytotoxic instead of a neuroprotective activation. Aged microglia, more inflammatory and less sensitive to TGFβ regulation, can contribute to elevate D-serine levels in the brain (Figure 2), as they enhance serine racemase expression and D-serine release during inflammatory activation. The abnormal increase on free D-serine by overactivated microglia can potentiate glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity and impair glutamate-mediated plasticity. Thus, we hypothesize that the functional impairment of aged microglia results in D-serine dysregulation contributing to induction of neurodegenerative diseases like AD.

Figure 2: Impact of aging in microglial function and release of D-serine. In aging, a mild chronic inflammation promotes dysfunction of microglia and their cytotoxic activation. In contrast to young microglia, aged microglia show changes in TGFβ1-Smad signaling that promote an inflammatory microglial phenotype. They release decreased levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines and high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and D-serine. The inflammatory environment together with increased levels of free D-serine could induce impairment in synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity and contribute to neurodegeneration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The article was funded by Postdoctoral Grants CONICYT [3180553] to SBC, FONDECYT [1171645] to RvB, and FONDECYT [1171434] and Proyecto Fortalecimiento USACH USA1799_EJ211419 to JE.

References

  1. S. Pawate, Q. Shen, F. Fan, and N. R. Bhat, “Redox regulation of glial inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide and interferongamma,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 540–551, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Qin, G. Li, X. Qian et al., “Interactive role of the toll-like receptor 4 and reactive oxygen species in LPS-induced microglia activation,” Glia, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 78–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Hayashi, M. Yoshida, M. Yamato et al., “Reverse of age-dependent memory impairment and mitochondrial DNA damage in microglia by an overexpression of human mitochondrial transcription factor A in mice,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 8624–34, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Gomes-Leal, “Microglial physiopathology: how to explain the dual role of microglia after acute neural disorders?” Brain and Behavior: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345–356, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. P. Mothet, A. T. Parent, H. Wolosker et al., “D-serine is an endogenous ligand for the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 4926–4931, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. J. Schell, M. E. Molliver, and S. H. Snyder, “D-serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3948–3952, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Z. Wu, A. M. Bodles, M. M. Porter, W. S. Griffin, A. S. Basile, and S. W. Barger, “Induction of serine racemase expression and D-serine release from microglia by amyloid β-peptide,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. M. Williams, C. M. Diaz, L. T. Macnab, R. K. Sullivan, and D. V. Pow, “Immunocytochemical analysis of D-serine distribution in the mammalian brain reveals novel anatomical compartmentalizations in glia and neurons,” Glia, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 401–411, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Wolosker, E. Dumin, L. Balan, and V. N. Foltyn, “D-amino acids in the brain: D-serine in neurotransmission and neurodegeneration,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 275, no. 14, pp. 3514–3526, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Ding, N. Ma, M. Nagahama, K. Yamada, and R. Semba, “Localization of D-serine and serine racemase in neurons and neuroglias in mouse brain,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 263–267, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Beltran-Castillo, M. J. Olivares, R. A. Contreras et al., “D-serine released by astrocytes in brainstem regulates breathing response to CO2 levels,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 838, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. von Bernhardi, L. Eugenin-von Bernhardi, and J. Eugenin, “Microglial cell dysregulation in brain aging and neurodegeneration,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 124, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. J. Streit, N. W. Sammons, A. J. Kuhns, and D. L. Sparks, “Dystrophic microglia in the aging human brain,” Glia, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 208–212, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. M. Ye and R. W. Johnson, “Increased interleukin-6 expression by microglia from brain of aged mice,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 93, no. 1-2, pp. 139–148, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Sierra, A. C. Gottfried-Blackmore, B. S. McEwen, and K. Bulloch, “Microglia derived from aging mice exhibit an altered inflammatory profile,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 412–424, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. E. Tichauer and R. von Bernhardi, “Transforming growth factor-β stimulates β amyloid uptake by microglia through Smad3-dependent mechanisms,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1970–1980, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Floden and C. K. Combs, “Microglia demonstrate age-dependent interaction with amyloid-β fibrils,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 279–293, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. von Bernhardi, J. Tichauer, and L. Eugenin-von Bernhardi, “Proliferating culture of aged microglia for the study of neurodegenerative diseases,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. E. Tichauer, B. Flores, B. Soler, L. Eugenin-von Bernhardi, G. Ramirez, and R. von Bernhardi, “Age-dependent changes on TGFβ1 Smad3 pathway modify the pattern of microglial cell activation,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 37, pp. 187–196, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. W. Kleckner and R. Dingledine, “Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes,” Science, vol. 241, no. 4867, pp. 835–837, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Hashimoto, T. Nishikawa, T. Hayashi et al., “The presence of free D-serine in rat brain,” FEBS Letters, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. J. Schell, R. O. Brady, Jr, M. E. Molliver, and S. H. Snyder, “D-serine as a neuromodulator: regional and developmental localizations in rat brain glia resemble NMDA receptors,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1604–1615, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Hashimoto, T. Nishikawa, T. Oka, and K. Takahashi, “Endogenous D-serine in rat brain: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-related distribution and aging,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 783–786, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Wolosker, S. Blackshaw, and S. H. Snyder, “Serine racemase: a glial enzyme synthesizing D-serine to regulate glutamate-N-methyl-D-aspartate neurotransmission,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 23, pp. 13409–13414, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Wolosker, K. N. Sheth, M. Takahashi et al., “Purification of serine racemase: biosynthesis of the neuromodulator D-serine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 721–725, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. V. N. Foltyn, I. Bendikov, J. De Miranda et al., “Serine racemase modulates intracellular D-serine levels through an alpha, beta-elimination activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. 1754–1763, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Nagata, “Involvement of D-amino acid oxidase in elimination of D-serine in mouse brain,” Experientia, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 753–755, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Miya, R. Inoue, Y. Takata et al., “Serine racemase is predominantly localized in neurons in mouse brain,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 510, no. 6, pp. 641–654, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Puyal, M. Martineau, J. P. Mothet, M. T. Nicolas, and J. Raymond, “Changes in D-serine levels and localization during postnatal development of the rat vestibular nuclei,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 497, no. 4, pp. 610–621, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Dun, J. Duplantier, P. Roon, P. M. Martin, V. Ganapathy, and S. B. Smith, “Serine racemase expression and D-serine content are developmentally regulated in neuronal ganglion cells of the retina,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 970–978, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. R. Stevens, M. Esguerra, P. M. Kim et al., “D-serine and serine racemase are present in the vertebrate retina and contribute to the physiological activation of NMDA receptors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 6789–6794, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Papouin, C. Henneberger, D. A. Rusakov, and S. H. R. Oliet, “Astroglial versus neuronal D-serine: fact checking,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 517–520, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Wolosker, D. T. Balu, and J. T. Coyle, “Astroglial versus neuronal D-serine: check your controls!,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 520–522, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Wu and S. W. Barger, “Induction of serine racemase by inflammatory stimuli is dependent on AP-1,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1035, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Wu, A. S. Basile, and S. W. Barger, “Induction of serine racemase expression and D-serine release from microglia by secreted amyloid precursor protein (sAPP),” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Yamasaki, K. Yamada, S. Furuya, J. Mitoma, Y. Hirabayashi, and M. Watanabe, “3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme for l-serine biosynthesis, is preferentially expressed in the radial glia/astrocyte lineage and olfactory ensheathing glia in the mouse brain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 7691–7704, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. H. Yang, A. Wada, K. Yoshida et al., “Brain-specific Phgdh deletion reveals a pivotal role for L-serine biosynthesis in controlling the level of D-serine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor co-agonist, in adult brain,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 53, pp. 41380–41390, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. T. Ehmsen, T. M. Ma, H. Sason et al., “D-serine in glia and neurons derives from 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 30, pp. 12464–12469, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Wolosker, “Serine racemase and the serine shuttle between neurons and astrocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1814, no. 11, pp. 1558–1566, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. S. Ribeiro, M. Reis, R. Panizzutti, J. de Miranda, and H. Wolosker, “Glial transport of the neuromodulator D-serine,” Brain Research, vol. 929, no. 2, pp. 202–209, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. P. Mothet, L. Pollegioni, G. Ouanounou, M. Martineau, P. Fossier, and G. Baux, “Glutamate receptor activation triggers a calcium-dependent and SNARE protein-dependent release of the gliotransmitter D-serine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 15, pp. 5606–5611, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Henneberger, T. Papouin, S. H. Oliet, and D. A. Rusakov, “Long-term potentiation depends on release of D-serine from astrocytes,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7278, pp. 232–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Rosenberg, E. Kartvelishvily, M. Shleper, C. M. Klinker, M. T. Bowser, and H. Wolosker, “Neuronal release of D-serine: a physiological pathway controlling extracellular D-serine concentration,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2951–2961, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. N. Takata, T. Mishima, C. Hisatsune et al., “Astrocyte calcium signaling transforms cholinergic modulation to cortical plasticity in vivo,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 49, pp. 18155–18165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Stehberg, R. Moraga-Amaro, C. Salazar et al., “Release of gliotransmitters through astroglial connexin 43 hemichannels is necessary for fear memory consolidation in the basolateral amygdala,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 3649–3657, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Maucler, P. Pernot, N. Vasylieva, L. Pollegioni, and S. Marinesco, “In vivo D-serine hetero-exchange through alanine-serine-cysteine (ASC) transporters detected by microelectrode biosensors,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 772–781, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. Shigetomi, O. Jackson-Weaver, R. T. Huckstepp, T. J. O'Dell, and B. S. Khakh, “TRPA1 channels are regulators of astrocyte basal calcium levels and long-term potentiation via constitutive D-serine release,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 10143–10153, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Martineau, V. Parpura, and J. P. Mothet, “Cell-type specific mechanisms of D-serine uptake and release in the brain,” Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. G. Junjaud, E. Rouaud, F. Turpin, J. P. Mothet, and J. M. Billard, “Age-related effects of the neuromodulator D-serine on neurotransmission and synaptic potentiation in the CA1 hippocampal area of the rat,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1159–1166, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. P. Diniz, J. C. Almeida, V. Tortelli et al., “Astrocyte-induced synaptogenesis is mediated by transforming growth factor β signaling through modulation of D-serine levels in cerebral cortex neurons,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 49, pp. 41432–41445, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. D. Steinmetz, E. Fava, P. Nicotera, and D. Steinhilber, “A simple cell line based in vitro test system for N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ligands,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 99–110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. H. Katsuki, Y. Watanabe, S. Fujimoto, T. Kume, and A. Akaike, “Contribution of endogenous glycine and d-serine to excitotoxic and ischemic cell death in rat cerebrocortical slice cultures,” Life Sciences, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 740–9, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. M. Billard, “D-serine in the aging hippocampus,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 116, pp. 18–24, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. J. Streit, “Microglia as neuroprotective, immunocompetent cells of the CNS,” Glia, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. H. Kettenmann, U. K. Hanisch, M. Noda, and A. Verkhratsky, “Physiology of microglia,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 461–553, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. von Bernhardi and J. Eugenin, “Microglial reactivity to beta-amyloid is modulated by astrocytes and proinflammatory factors,” Brain Research, vol. 1025, no. 1-2, pp. 186–193, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. L. Li, J. Lu, S. S. Tay, S. M. Moochhala, and B. P. He, “The function of microglia, either neuroprotection or neurotoxicity, is determined by the equilibrium among factors released from activated microglia in vitro,” Brain Research, vol. 1159, pp. 8–17, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. K. Nakajima, Y. Tohyama, S. Maeda, S. Kohsaka, and T. Kurihara, “Neuronal regulation by which microglia enhance the production of neurotrophic factors for GABAergic, catecholaminergic, and cholinergic neurons,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 807–820, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. V. Welser-Alves and R. Milner, “Microglia are the major source of TNF-α and TGF-β1 in postnatal glial cultures; regulation by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and vitronectin,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. R. von Bernhardi, F. Cornejo, G. E. Parada, and J. Eugenin, “Role of TGFβ signaling in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 426, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. R. Franco and D. Fernandez-Suarez, “Alternatively activated microglia and macrophages in the central nervous system,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 131, pp. 65–86, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. D. Cherry, J. A. Olschowka, and M. K. O'Banion, “Are “resting” microglia more “m2”?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, p. 594, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. Y. Tang and W. Le, “Differential roles of M1 and M2 microglia in neurodegenerative diseases,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1181–1194, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. Herrera-Molina and R. von Bernhardi, “Transforming growth factor-beta 1 produced by hippocampal cells modulates microglial reactivity in culture,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 229–236, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. G. Ramirez, R. Toro, H. Dobeli, and R. von Bernhardi, “Protection of rat primary hippocampal cultures from A beta cytotoxicity by pro-inflammatory molecules is mediated by astrocytes,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 243–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Wyss-Coray, C. Lin, F. Yan et al., “TGF-β1 promotes microglial amyloid-β clearance and reduces plaque burden in transgenic mice,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 612–618, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. Derynck and Y. E. Zhang, “Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6958, pp. 577–584, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Weiss and L. Attisano, “The TGFbeta superfamily signaling pathway,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. K. Saud, R. Herrera-Molina, and R. Von Bernhardi, “Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines regulate the ERK pathway: implication of the timing for the activation of microglial cells,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 277–287, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Horio, M. Kohno, Y. Fujita et al., “Levels of D-serine in the brain and peripheral organs of serine racemase (Srr) knock-out mice,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 853–859, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. E. J. Perez, S. A. Tapanes, Z. B. Loris et al., “Enhanced astrocytic d-serine underlies synaptic damage after traumatic brain injury,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 3114–3125, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. M. Zhang and J. An, “Cytokines, inflammation, and pain,” International Anesthesiology Clinics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 27–37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. W. Barger and A. S. Basile, “Activation of microglia by secreted amyloid precursor protein evokes release of glutamate by cystine exchange and attenuates synaptic function,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 846–854, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  74. A. Young, “Ageing and physiological functions,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 352, no. 1363, pp. 1837–1843, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. R. G. Smith, L. Betancourt, and Y. Sun, “Molecular endocrinology and physiology of the aging central nervous system,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 203–250, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. R. L. Yung and A. Julius, “Epigenetics, aging, and autoimmunity,” Autoimmunity, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 329–335, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. A. Lipsitz and A. L. Goldberger, “Loss of “complexity” and aging. Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence,” JAMA, vol. 267, no. 13, pp. 1806–1809, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. A. Larbi, C. Franceschi, D. Mazzatti, R. Solana, A. Wikby, and G. Pawelec, “Aging of the immune system as a prognostic factor for human longevity,” Physiology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 64–74, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. C. K. Lee, R. Weindruch, and T. A. Prolla, “Gene-expression profile of the ageing brain in mice,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 294–297, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. P. de Magalhaes, J. Curado, and G. M. Church, “Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 875–881, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. L. Block, L. Zecca, and J. S. Hong, “Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. R. von Bernhardi, “Glial cell dysregulation: a new perspective on Alzheimer disease,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 215–232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. H. M. Gao and J. S. Hong, “Why neurodegenerative diseases are progressive: uncontrolled inflammation drives disease progression,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 357–365, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. H. Akiyama, S. Barger, S. Barnum et al., “Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. T. Heneka and M. K. O'Banion, “Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 184, no. 1-2, pp. 69–91, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. E. C. Hirsch and S. Hunot, “Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: a target for neuroprotection?” Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 382–397, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. M. D. Nguyen, J. P. Julien, and S. Rivest, “Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 216–227, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. Bjorkqvist, E. J. Wild, and S. J. Tabrizi, “Harnessing immune alterations in neurodegenerative diseases,” Neuron, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. S. Sanjabi, L. A. Zenewicz, M. Kamanaka, and R. A. Flavell, “Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory roles of TGF-beta, IL-10, and IL-22 in immunity and autoimmunity,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 447–453, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. Y. Zhu, C. Culmsee, S. Klumpp, and J. Krieglstein, “Neuroprotection by transforming growth factor-β1 involves activation of nuclear factor-κB through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase/Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase-extracellular-signal regulated kinase1,2 signaling pathways,” Neuroscience, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 897–906, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. E. Rota, G. Bellone, P. Rocca, B. Bergamasco, G. Emanuelli, and P. Ferrero, “Increased intrathecal TGF-β1, but not IL-12, IFN-γ and IL-10 levels in Alzheimer’s disease patients,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. Motta, R. Imbesi, M. Di Rosa, F. Stivala, and L. Malaguarnera, “Altered plasma cytokine levels in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with the disease progression,” Immunology Letters, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. G. Ramirez, S. Rey, and R. von Bernhardi, “Proinflammatory stimuli are needed for induction of microglial cell-mediated AβPP244-C and Aβ-neurotoxicity in hippocampal cultures,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. C. Ewald and H. T. Cline, “NMDA receptors and brain development,” in Biology of the NMDA Receptor, A. M. Dongen, Ed., Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  95. S. A. Fuchs, L. Dorland, M. G. de Sain-van der Velden et al., “D-serine in the developing human central nervous system,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 476–480, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. Jaeken, M. Detheux, L. Van Maldergem et al., “3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase deficiency and 3-phosphoserine phosphatase deficiency: inborn errors of serine biosynthesis,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 223–226, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. S. Grassi and V. E. Pettorossi, “Synaptic plasticity in the medial vestibular nuclei: role of glutamate receptors and retrograde messengers in rat brainstem slices,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 527–553, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. D. Yamazaki, J. Horiuchi, K. Ueno et al., “Glial dysfunction causes age-related memory impairment in Drosophila,” Neuron, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 753–763, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. B. Potier, F. R. Turpin, P. M. Sinet et al., “Contribution of the d-serine-dependent pathway to the cellular mechanisms underlying cognitive aging,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 2, p. 1, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Alliot, S. Boghossian, D. Jourdan et al., “The LOU/c/jall rat as an animal model of healthy aging?” The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. B312–B320, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. K. Eckles-Smith, D. Clayton, P. Bickford, and M. D. Browning, “Caloric restriction prevents age-related deficits in LTP and in NMDA receptor expression,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 78, no. 1-2, pp. 154–162, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. N. Hori, I. Hirotsu, P. J. Davis, and D. O. Carpenter, “Long-term potentiation is lost in aged rats but preserved by calorie restriction,” Neuroreport, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1085–1088, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. C. Veyrat-Durebex and J. Alliot, “Changes in pattern of macronutrient intake during aging in male and female rats,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1273–1278, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. R. Gredilla, M. Lopez-Torres, and G. Barja, “Effect of time of restriction on the decrease in mitochondrial H2O2 production and oxidative DNA damage in the heart of food-restricted rats,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 273–277, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. E. Walsh, Y. Shi, and H. Van Remmen, “The effects of dietary restriction on oxidative stress in rodents,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 66, pp. 88–99, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. I. K. H. Hadem, T. Majaw, B. Kharbuli, and R. Sharma, “Beneficial effects of dietary restriction in aging brain,” Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. V. Jagannath, Z. Marinova, C. M. Monoranu, S. Walitza, and E. Grunblatt, “Expression of D-amino acid oxidase (DAO/DAAO) and D-amino acid oxidase activator (DAOA/G72) during development and aging in the human post-mortem brain,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, vol. 11, p. 31, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. H. Lin, H. T. Yang, C. C. Chiu, and H. Y. Lane, “Blood levels of D-amino acid oxidase vs. D-amino acids in reflecting cognitive aging,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 14849, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. S. Li, Y. Uno, U. Rudolph et al., “Astrocytes in primary cultures express serine racemase, synthesize d-serine and acquire A1 reactive astrocyte features,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 151, pp. 245–251, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. A. Lourbopoulos, A. Erturk, and F. Hellal, “Microglia in action: how aging and injury can change the brain’s guardians,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 54, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. L. Klapal, B. A. Igelhorst, and I. D. Dietzel-Meyer, “Changes in neuronal excitability by activated microglia: differential Na+ current upregulation in pyramid-shaped and bipolar neurons by TNF-α and IL-18,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 7, p. 44, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. S. A. Liddelow, K. A. Guttenplan, L. E. Clarke et al., “Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia,” Nature, vol. 541, no. 7638, pp. 481–487, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. B. Zhao, Q. Wang, J. Du, S. Luo, J. Xia, and Y. G. Chen, “PICK1 promotes caveolin-dependent degradation of TGF-β type I receptor,” Cell Research, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1467–1478, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. K. Fujii, K. Maeda, T. Hikida et al., “Serine racemase binds to PICK1: potential relevance to schizophrenia,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. C. Vargas-Lopes, C. Madeira, S. A. Kahn et al., “Protein kinase C activity regulates D-serine availability in the brain,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 281–290, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. Y. N. Wang, L. Zhou, Y. H. Li et al., “Protein interacting with C-kinase 1 deficiency impairs glutathione synthesis and increases oxidative stress via reduction of surface excitatory amino acid carrier 1,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 16, pp. 6429–6443, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. J. Zhu, Z. Wang, N. Zhang et al., “Protein interacting C-kinase 1 modulates surface expression of P2Y6 purinoreceptor, actin polymerization and phagocytosis in microglia,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 795–803, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. M. C. Focant and E. Hermans, “Protein interacting with C kinase and neurological disorders,” Synapse, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 532–540, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. Y. Yang, W. Ge, Y. Chen et al., “Contribution of astrocytes to hippocampal long-term potentiation through release of D-serine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 25, pp. 15194–15199, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. S. A. Fuchs, M. G. de Sain-van der Velden, M. M. de Barse et al., “Two mass-spectrometric techniques for quantifying serine enantiomers and glycine in cerebrospinal fluid: potential confounders and age-dependent ranges,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1443–1450, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. G. Bain, W. J. Ray, M. Yao, and D. I. Gottlieb, “From embryonal carcinoma cells to neurons: the P 19 pathway,” BioEssays, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 343–348, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. S. A. Fuchs, M. W. Roeleveld, L. W. Klomp, R. Berger, and T. J. de Koning, “D-serine influences synaptogenesis in a p19 cell model,” in JIMD Reports - Case and Research Reports, 2012/3, SSIEM, Ed., vol. 6 of JIMD Reports, pp. 47–53, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. P. M. Kim, H. Aizawa, P. S. Kim et al., “Serine racemase: activation by glutamate neurotransmission via glutamate receptor interacting protein and mediation of neuronal migration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 2105–2110, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. H. Zhang, L. Song, Y. Chang et al., “Potential deficit from decreased cerebellar granule cell migration in serine racemase-deficient mice is reversed by increased expression of GluN2B and elevated levels of NMDAR agonists,” Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences, vol. 85, pp. 119–126, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. H. Han, Y. Peng, and Z. Dong, “D-serine rescues the deficits of hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning and memory induced by sodium fluoroacetate,” Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, vol. 133, pp. 51–56, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. M. Kollen, A. Stephan, A. Faivre-Bauman et al., “Preserved memory capacities in aged Lou/C/Jall rats,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 129–142, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. A. Miyamoto, H. Wake, A. W. Ishikawa et al., “Microglia contact induces synapse formation in developing somatosensory cortex,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, article 12540, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. P. Schafer, E. K. Lehrman, A. G. Kautzman et al., “Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner,” Neuron, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 691–705, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. C. N. Parkhurst, G. Yang, I. Ninan et al., “Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor,” Cell, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 1596–1609, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. D. W. Choi, J. Y. Koh, and S. Peters, “Pharmacology of glutamate neurotoxicity in cortical cell culture: attenuation by NMDA antagonists,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 185–196, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. G. E. Hardingham and H. Bading, “Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 682–696, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. M. P. Parsons and L. A. Raymond, “Extrasynaptic NMDA receptor involvement in central nervous system disorders,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 279–293, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. T. Papouin, L. Ladepeche, J. Ruel et al., “Synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors are gated by different endogenous coagonists,” Cell, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 633–646, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. X. Zhou, D. Hollern, J. Liao, E. Andrechek, and H. Wang, “NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity depends on the coactivation of synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 3, p. e560, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. E. H. Lo, A. R. Pierce, K. Matsumoto, T. Kano, C. J. Evans, and R. Newcomb, “Alterations in K+ evoked profiles of neurotransmitter and neuromodulator amino acids after focal ischemia-reperfusion,” Neuroscience, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 449–458, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. H. Katsuki, M. Nonaka, H. Shirakawa, T. Kume, and A. Akaike, “Endogenous D-serine is involved in induction of neuronal death by N-methyl-D-aspartate and simulated ischemia in rat cerebrocortical slices,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 836–844, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. H. S. Choi, D. H. Roh, S. Y. Yoon et al., “Differential involvement of ipsilateral and contralateral spinal cord astrocyte D-serine in carrageenan-induced mirror-image pain: role of sigma 1 receptors and astrocyte gap junctions,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 558–572, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. P. Moore, A. El-sherbeny, P. Roon, P. V. Schoenlein, V. Ganapathy, and S. B. Smith, “Apoptotic cell death in the mouse retinal ganglion cell layer is induced in vivo by the excitatory amino acid homocysteine,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. H. Jiang, J. Fang, B. Wu et al., “Overexpression of serine racemase in retina and overproduction of D-serine in eyes of streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 119, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. H. Ozaki, R. Inoue, T. Matsushima, M. Sasahara, A. Hayashi, and H. Mori, “Serine racemase deletion attenuates neurodegeneration and microvascular damage in diabetic retinopathy,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 1, article e0190864, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. C. Madeira, M. V. Lourenco, C. Vargas-Lopes et al., “D-serine levels in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for novel biomarker development,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 5, no. 5, article e561, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. Y. Nagata, M. Borghi, G. H. Fisher, and A. D'Aniello, “Free D-serine concentration in normal and Alzheimer human brain,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 181–183, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. E. A. Biemans, N. M. Verhoeven-Duif, J. Gerrits, J. A. Claassen, H. B. Kuiperij, and M. M. Verbeek, “CSF d-serine concentrations are similar in Alzheimer’s disease, other dementias, and elderly controls,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 42, pp. 213–216, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. K. Hashimoto, T. Fukushima, E. Shimizu et al., “Possible role of D-serine in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 385–388, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus