Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3649613 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3649613

Jing Gong, Qi-Hang Tai, Guang-Xiao Xu, Xue-Ting Wang, Jing-Li Zhu, Xiao-Qing Zhao, Hai-Bin Sun, Dan Zhu, Wei Gao, "Ac2-26 Alleviates Brain Injury after Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Rats via the eNOS Pathway", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2020, Article ID 3649613, 10 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3649613

Ac2-26 Alleviates Brain Injury after Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Rats via the eNOS Pathway

Academic Editor: Oleh Andrukhov
Received31 Mar 2020
Revised09 Jul 2020
Accepted14 Jul 2020
Published18 Aug 2020

Abstract

Background. Brain injury is the leading cause of death following cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Ac2-26 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) have been shown to reduce neuroinflammation. This study is aimed at determining the mechanism by which Ac2-26 protects against inflammation during brain injury following CA and CPR. Methods. Sixty-four rats were randomized into sham, saline, Ac2-26, and Ac2-26+L-NIO (endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) inhibitor) groups. Rats received Ac2-26, Ac2-26+L-NIO, or saline after CPR. Neurologic function was assessed at baseline, 24, and 72 hours after CPR. At 72 hours after resuscitation, serum and brain tissues were collected. Results. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability increased, and the number of surviving neurons and neurological function decreased in the saline group compared to the sham group. Anti-inflammatory and proinflammatory factors, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels, and the expression of eNOS, phosphorylated (p)-eNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and oxidative stress-related factors in the three CA groups significantly increased (). BBB permeability decreased, and the number of surviving neurons and neurological function increased in the Ac2-26 group compared to the saline group (). Ac2-26 increased anti-inflammatory and reduced proinflammatory markers, raised NSE levels, increased the expression of eNOS and p-eNOS, and reduced the expression of iNOS and oxidative stress-related factors compared to the saline group (). The effect of Ac2-26 on brain injury was reversed by L-NIO (). Conclusions. Ac2-26 reduced brain injury after CPR by inhibiting oxidative stress and neuroinflammation and protecting the BBB. The therapeutic effect of Ac2-26 on brain injury was largely dependent on the eNOS pathway.

1. Introduction

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. Brain injury is the main cause of death in patients with spontaneous circulation recovery after CA [1]. Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques have improved, 30-50% of CA survivors suffer from cognitive impairment, and about 20% have a decline in quality of life [2]. The major pathological mechanisms underlying brain injury in CA include postischemic neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, systemic inflammation, neurovascular injury, and cerebral edema [3].

AnnexinA1 (AnxA1) is an important endogenous mediator that induces the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids. AnxA1 is widely expressed in brain tissue [46]. Ac2-26, which is an exogenous active peptide of AnxA1, has been found to play a neuroprotective role. Specifically, Ac2-26 has been shown to protect against cerebral injury caused by stroke and is associated with decreased expression of cell adhesion and inflammatory factors [7]. Ac2-26 also plays a protective role in cerebral vascular injury during cerebral ischemia reperfusion [5]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that downregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) promotes the production of inflammatory cytokines and increases intercellular adhesion, thereby promoting inflammation [8]. Therefore, eNOS likely plays a key role in regulating inflammation during brain injury after CA. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that Ac2-26 could activate eNOS and ameliorate brain injury following CA and CPR. To test our hypothesis, we investigated the relationship between Ac2-26 and the eNOS pathway using the relatively specific eNOS inhibitor L-NIO [9, 10]. We found that Ac2-26-mediated protection against brain injury after CA and CPR was partially dependent on eNOS activation.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Committee for Animal Protection and Utilization of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. This study was carried out in accordance with the national guidelines for animal studies and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.

2.1. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-280 g) were obtained from the Animal Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.

2.2. CA and CPR

Rats were subjected to asphyxial CA and CPR according to previously published methods with minor modifications [11]. Briefly, all rats were anesthetized with 5% () sevoflurane, intubated, and then mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with 1.5% () sevoflurane. The right femoral artery and vein were cannulated to monitor blood pressure and to inject medicines, respectively. Electrocardiograms were monitored and recorded using subcutaneous needle electrodes. After injection of vecuronium (0.2 mg/kg), asphyxia was induced by stopping mechanical ventilation. CA was deemed successful when the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was <25 mmHg.

After 8 minutes of asphyxia, CPR was started by performing chest compressions at a frequency of 60 breaths/min and ventilation of 1 ml/kg with 100% O2. Epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg) and 5% sodium bicarbonate (1 mmol/kg) were injected into the femoral vein at the initiation of chest compression. Restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was defined by heart rhythm restoration and a MAP >60 mmHg. Rats that received CPR for more than 3 minutes were excluded from this study. When the rats recovered spontaneous respiration, the mechanical ventilation was withdrawn and all catheters were removed. The rats were kept in air-filled boxes at room temperature (~25°C) and had free access to water and food. After 72 hours of ROSC, all rats were examined and sacrificed.

2.3. Animal Grouping

Sixty-four rats were randomized into sham, saline, Ac2-26, and Ac2-26+L-NIO groups ( per group). Rats in the sham group only received anesthesia and ventilation. All other rats received CA and CPR and then were injected with either saline, Ac2-26 (1 mg/kg) (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, England), or Ac2-26+L-NIO (10 mg/kg) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) after ROSC [10, 12].

2.4. Physiological Parameter Monitoring

Arterial blood gas was analyzed at baseline (defined as 10 minutes before the onset of asphyxia), 1, and 72 hours after ROSC to test pH, PaO2, PaCO2, K+, Na+, and Cl- in the arterial blood. MAP measurements were recorded simultaneously.

2.5. BBB Permeability
2.5.1. Brain Water Content

After 72 hours of ROSC, part of the brain tissue was collected and weighed (wet weight) and then dried at 60°C for 72 hours. Water content in the brain tissue was calculated as .

2.5.2. Evans Blue Dye

Rats in each group were injected with a 2% Evans blue dye solution in saline (4 ml/kg). The dye was allowed to circulate for 2 hours. Cardiac perfusion with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was performed under deep anesthesia. The brains were then removed, weighed, and homogenized in N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The homogenate was maintained at room temperature in the dark for 72 hours and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 25 minutes. Absorbance of the supernatant was measured using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Spectronic Genesys 10 UV, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 610 nm [13]. The amount of Evans blue dye was calculated using a standard curve and is expressed as microgram/gram brain tissue.

2.6. Histopathological Analysis

The brain tissues of 8 rats in each group were perfused and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The tissues were sectioned into 30-mm-thick slices and mounted on polylysine-coated slides overnight. On the next day, the sections were rehydrated in distilled water and submerged in 1% cresyl violet for 10 minutes until the desired depth of staining was achieved. Nissl staining was performed to determine neuronal survival. The number of surviving neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region was observed and recorded in three separate nonadjacent sections from each animal, using the ImageJ software. Neurons with clear characteristics of a visible nucleus and intact cytoplasm were considered to be surviving neurons. Neuronal staining evaluation was performed by a pathologist who was blinded to the group assignment.

2.7. Evaluation of Neurologic Function

Neurologic function was determined using neurological deficit scores (NDS) at baseline, 24, and 72 hours after ROSC. The evaluation of NDS included 7 aspects: general behavior, brain stem function, motor assessment, sensory assessment, motor behavior, behavior, and seizures [11] (Table 1). Functional assessment was performed by two independent researchers. An NDS of 80 represents normal brain function, and an NDS of 0 represented neuronal death.


General behavior
 ConsciousnessNormal (10), stuporous (5), comatose (0)
 ArousalEyes open spontaneously (3), eyes open to pain (1), no eye opening (0)
 RespirationNormal (6), abnormal (0), absent (0)
Brain-stem function
 OlfactionPresent (3), absent (0)
 VisionPresent (3), absent (0)
 Pupillary reflexPresent (3), absent (0)
 Corneal reflexPresent (3), absent (0)
 Startle reflexPresent (3), absent (0)
 Whisker stimulationPresent (3), absent (0)
 SwallowingPresent (3), absent (0)
Motor assessment
 Strength (left and right side tested and scored separately)Normal (3), stiff/weak (1), no movement/paralyzed (0)
Sensory assessment
 Pain (left and right side tested and scored separately)Brisk withdrawal with pain (3), weak or abnormal response (1), no withdrawal (0)
Motor behavior
 Gait coordinationNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
 Balance on beamNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
Behavior
 Righting reflexNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
 Negative geotaxisNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
 Visual placingNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
 Turning alleyNormal (3), abnormal (1), absent (0)
Seizures
 Convulsive or nonconvulsiveNo seizure (10), focal seizure (5), general seizure (0)

2.8. Cytokine Detection

At 72 hours after ROSC, brain tissues and serum were collected and homogenized with a tissue diluent to prepare the homogenate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected. To evaluate the effect of Ac2-26 on local inflammation, we measured the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 in the homogenate and NSE levels in the serum using enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (Nanjing Jiancheng Corp, China).

2.9. Western Blot

Brain tissues were collected and lysed in RIPA buffer in a mixture containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China). Protein concentrations in each sample were calculated using the Bradford assay. Equal amounts of total protein from the tissue lysates were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF, Roche). The membranes were blocked in 5% dry milk (diluted with Tris buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) buffer) for 2 hours at room temperature and then incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS, eNOS, p-eNOS (1 : 1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, USA), p-NF-κB (1 : 1000; ABclonal, China), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (1 : 3,000; Boster Biological Technology, China) primary antibodies (diluted in 1X TBST with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)) for 16 hours at 4°C. The membranes were washed three times for 5 minutes with TBST at room temperature and incubated with a secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG antibody (1 : 5,000; Boster Biological Technology, CHINA) for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing three times for 5 minutes with TBST at room temperature, the protein bands were detected using horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence.

2.10. Oxidative Stress Response

Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and xanthine oxidase (XO) activation in brain tissues were analyzed using a Coomassie blue dye-binding assay (Nanjing Jiancheng Corp, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as the (SD). Differences among groups were analyzed using analysis of a one-way analysis of variance. All analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Two rats in the saline group, one rat in the Ac2-26 group, and one rat in the Ac2-26+L-NIO group failed to be resuscitated within 3 minutes of CPR and were excluded from all analyses.

3.1. Physiologic Variables

There were no significant differences in body weight and temperature between the groups (data not shown). Parameters related to the resuscitation procedure, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), K+, Na+, and Cl-, did not differ in the three CA groups.

3.2. Ac2-26 Ameliorated Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Permeability

We did not observe brain edema in the sham group; however, BBB permeability deteriorated in rats following restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The wet/dry ratio and Evans blue dye in the brain tissues were significantly increased in the saline group compared to the Ac2-26 group. The eNOS inhibitor L-NIO reduced the effects of Ac2-26 on BBB () (Figure 1).

3.3. Ac2-26 Increased Neuronal Survival

We observed a decrease in neuronal survival in the hippocampal CA1 region of the brain in the three CA groups compared to the sham group (). The number of surviving hippocampal CA1 neurons in the Ac2-26 group was significantly higher compared to the saline group (). However, L-NIO significantly reversed the protective effect of Ac2-26 on neuronal survival () (Figure 2).

3.4. Ac2-26 Improved the Neurological Deficit Scores (NDS)

The NDS of all four groups was 80 at baseline (data not shown). However, following CA, the NDS significantly decreased 24 h after ROSC, and there were no significant differences among the three CA groups with regard to neurological status at this time point. The rats that underwent CA showed motor incoordination, sensory disturbance, spastic paralysis of hind limbs, seizures, and other neurological damage presentation, compared to the sham group. The NDS of rats in the saline group were obviously lower compared to those in the sham group (). After 72 h, the NDS of the rats in the Ac2-26 group were significantly higher compared to those in the saline group (). However, L-NIO partially reversed the effect of Ac2-26 on NDS () (Figure 3).

3.5. Ac2-26 Reduced Brain Damage

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum levels were measured 72 hours after resuscitation. NSE levels in nerve tissues have been reported to be closely related to the prognosis of neurological function in ischemic brain injury [14]. NSE levels significantly increased in the three CA groups compared to those in the sham group (). Ac2-26 decreased the NSE levels (), and L-NIO treatment reversed the effects of Ac2-26 () (Figure 4).

3.6. Ac2-26 Reduced Neuroinflammation

We next measured the expression of cytokines ((interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-10) and (phosphorylated nuclear factor-κB (p-NF-κB))) in brain tissues. Compared to the sham group, the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 and p-NF-κB significantly increased after CA. Compared to the saline group, IL-1β and IL-6 expression significantly decreased, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 significantly increased in the Ac2-26 group (). However, compared to the Ac2-26 group, L-NIO significantly increased IL-1β and IL-6 expression, but decreased IL-10 expression, in the Ac2-26+L-NIO group () (Figure 5). Similarly, p-NF-κB expression in the brain tissues was significantly upregulated in rats following CA. Compared with the saline group, Ac2-26 significantly reduced p-NF-κB expression, but this reduction was significantly reversed by L-NIO () (Figure 6).

3.7. eNOS, P-eNOS, and iNOS Expression

After CA and CPB, the levels of eNOS, p-eNOS, and iNOS were significantly upregulated in the brain tissues. Compared to the saline group, eNOS and p-eNOS expression was significantly increased, and iNOS expression was reduced () in the Ac2-26 group. Compared to the Ac2-26 group, L-NIO significantly inhibited eNOS and p-eNOS expression but enhanced iNOS expression in the brain tissues () (Figure 6).

3.8. Ac2-26 Inhibited Oxidative Stress

After 72 h of resuscitation, we measured MDA levels and MPO and XO activation in the brain tissues. After CA and CPR, we observed a severe oxidative stress response (). In the Ac2-26 group, MDA levels and MPO and XO activation were significantly decreased relative to the saline group (). L-NIO significantly inhibited the effects of Ac2-26 on oxidative stress () (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that the active peptide of AnxA1 and Ac2-26, significantly reduced the brain injury induced by CA, improved neurological function and BBB permeability, and decreased neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. We also showed that the protection conferred by Ac2-26 was partially dependent on the eNOS pathway.

Anoxic-ischemic brain injury is the leading cause of mortality after CA and CPR. Following CA, the heart stops pumping completely. Subsequently, cerebral oxygen stores are lost within 20 seconds, and glucose and adenosine triphosphate are depleted within 5 minutes [1]. Lack of cellular ATP leads to dysfunction of ion pumps and accumulation of Na+ and Ca2+ in the cells, which promotes the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Consequently, N-methyl D-aspartate-regulated (NMDA) cation channels are activated, and more Ca2+ enters the cells, leading to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the formation of hypoxanthine [15]. During tissue reperfusion/reoxidation, XO converts hypoxanthine to uric acid to form superoxides [16]. During CA, hypoxia leads to ROS production and secondary local inflammation, which further results in brain damage, increased BBB permeability, neuron apoptosis, and neurological dysfunction [1, 17, 18].

AnxA1 and its active peptide, Ac2-26, have been suggested to reduce heart and lung ischemia reperfusion injury [12, 19]. We previously reported that Ac2-26 can reduce lung ischemia reperfusion injury by regulating inflammation [20]. Exogenous AnxA1 administration can inhibit the noninflammatory phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons and reduce the production of inflammatory mediators [21]. Ac2-26 was found to reduce cerebral edema in rats after ROSC and reduce the distribution of Evans blue staining in brain tissue. We found that Ac2-26 reduced BBB permeability and thus increased neuronal survival and improved nerve function. NSE overexpression is commonly used as a specific marker of brain injury severity [22]. In this study, we found that Ac2-26 decreased NSE levels after ROSC. We speculate that the protection conferred by Ac2-26 may be associated with its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties.

XO is a key enzyme in purine catabolism and a major source of free radicals [23]. During CA, anaerobic metabolism will generate ROS in response to XO production. The increase in ROS leads to lipid peroxidation, with MDA as the final product of this process. As such, MDA is an effective biomarker of lipid oxidation [24]. MPO can be released by activated microglia and astrocytes, resulting in an increase in highly reactive oxidants and free radicals that are harmful to brain function [25]. In contrast, NO reacts with superoxide to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-), which also plays a role during brain injury [26]. Excessive ROS activate iNOS to produce NO [26]. A deficiency in eNOS also contributes to enhanced NO generation via the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway [27]. In this study, we found that Ac2-26 significantly reduced MDA levels and inhibited XO and MPO activation after CA and CPR. These results indicate that Ac2-26-mediated amelioration of brain injury may be due to inhibition of oxidative stress. Ac2-26 significantly reduced iNOS and increased eNOS expression after CA and CPR. Therefore, we speculate that the therapeutic effect of Ac2-26 after CA and CPR may be achieved by modulating iNOS and eNOS levels.

During ischemia and hypoxia, NF-κB is rapidly activated in response to increases in oxidative stress, which promotes the production of inflammatory factors [28]. In this study, we found that Ac2-26 significantly reduced inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β and IL-6) levels and that the Ac2-26-mediated effects on local inflammation were associated with NF-κB inhibition. Cell death and release of excitatory toxic molecules cause microglia to secrete cytokines into the brain, further aggravating brain injury [1]. Ac2-26 can promote the transformation of microglial cells from the proinflammatory M1 status to the anti-inflammatory M2 status, which results in a reduction of inflammatory cytokines and protection of neurons [6]. Microglial cells also express IL-10, which is as an anti-inflammatory cytokine [29]. Since Ac2-26 reduced proinflammatory factors and increased anti-inflammatory factors in the brain tissues, Ac2-26 likely reduces local inflammation by regulating NF-κB activation in microglia cells.

Ac2-26 has been shown to activate the PI3K/AKT pathway [19]. Phosphorylation of upstream AKT promotes eNOS activation [30]. Therefore, to explore the possible mechanism of Ac2-26 in brain injury after ROSC, we administrated L-NIO, an eNOS inhibitor, to determine if Ac2-26-mediated protection is dependent on eNOS. L-NIO significantly reversed the effects of Ac2-26 on neurological function, histological score, and edema. Local oxidative stress and inflammation were also increased following L-NIO treatment. These results suggest that the protection conferred by Ac2-26 on brain injury after CA is partially dependent on eNOS activation.

5. Conclusion

Ac2-26 reduced brain injury after CPR by inhibiting oxidative stress and neuroinflammation and protecting the BBB. The therapeutic effect of Ac2-26 on brain injury was largely dependent on the eNOS pathway.

6. Limitations

There are several limitations in our study. First L-NIO is a nonspecific eNOS inhibitor. In our future study, we will use microRNA to interfere with AKT activation to further explore the mechanism by which Ac2-26 protects against brain injury after CA. Second, the present study did not measure the effect of Ac2-26 on cell apoptosis in brain tissue. It has been shown that Ac2-26 can enhance apoptosis of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils [31]. Our future study will utilize a cell model to investigate the effect of Ac2-26 on cell apoptosis in brain tissue.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Wei Gao designed the study and provided intellectual input. Jing Gong carried out the experimental work, analyzed the data, and wrote and critically reviewed the manuscript. Dan Zhu carried out the experimental work and analyzed the data. Qi-Hang Tai, Guang-Xiao Xu, Xue-ting Wang, Jing-li Zhu, Xiao-Qing Zhao, and Hai-Bin Sun carried out the experimental work. Dan Zhu and Wei Gao should be regarded as cocorresponding authors.

References

  1. J. E. Fugate, “Anoxic-ischemic brain injury,” Neurologic Clinics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 601–611, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Naber and M. Bullinger, “Psychiatric sequelae of cardiac arrest,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  3. N. Mai, K. Miller-Rhodes, S. Knowlden, and M. W. Halterman, “The post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a case for lung-brain coupling and opportunities for neuroprotection,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 939–958, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. Solito, S. McArthur, H. Christian, F. Gavins, J. C. Buckingham, and G. E. Gillies, “Annexin A1 in the brain--undiscovered roles?” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 135–142, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Cristante, S. McArthur, C. Mauro et al., “Identification of an essential endogenous regulator of blood-brain barrier integrity, and its pathological and therapeutic implications,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 832–841, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z. Z. Luo, Y. Gao, N. Sun et al., “Enhancing the interaction between annexin-1 and formyl peptide receptors regulates microglial activation to protect neurons from ischemia-like injury,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 276, no. 1-2, pp. 24–36, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. N. E. Gavins, J. Dalli, R. J. Flower, D. N. Granger, and M. Perretti, “Activation of the annexin 1 counter-regulatory circuit affords protection in the mouse brain microcirculation,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1751–1758, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. R. Koch, H. Choi, E. H. Mace, and R. J. Stark, “Toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammation by p38 is enhanced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockdown,” Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 33, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Rus, F. Molina, M. Á. Peinado, and M. L. del Moral, “Endothelial NOS-derived nitric oxide prevents injury resulting from reoxygenation in the hypoxic lung,” Free Radical Research, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1027–1035, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Greco, C. Demartini, A. M. Zanaboni, F. Blandini, D. Amantea, and C. Tassorelli, “Modulation of cerebral RAGE expression following nitric oxide synthase inhibition in rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 800, pp. 16–22, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. J. Gao, J. P. Li, W. Wang et al., “Effects of intracerebroventricular application of the delta opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2, D-Leu5] enkephalin on neurological recovery following asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 531–542, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W.-I. Liao, S.-Y. Wu, G.-C. Wu et al., “Ac2-26, an Annexin A1 peptide, attenuates ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute lung injury,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 1771, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Sahu, R. Sandhir, and A. S. Naura, “Two hit induced acute lung injury impairs cognitive function in mice: a potential model to study cross talk between lung and brain,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 73, pp. 633–642, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Mokhtari, H. Nayeb-Aghaei, M. Kouchek et al., “Effect of memantine on serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and on the Glasgow Coma Scale in patients with moderate traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Albrecht, K. Zitta, F. Groenendaal, F. van Bel, and C. Peeters-Scholte, “Neuroprotective strategies following perinatal hypoxia-ischemia: taking?Aim at NOS,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 142, pp. 123–131, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Glantzounis, E. Tsimoyiannis, A. Kappas, and D. Galaris, “Uric acid and oxidative stress,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 11, no. 32, pp. 4145–4151, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. L. Franklin, “Redox regulation of the intrinsic pathway in neuronal apoptosis,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1437–1448, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. H. Heo, S. W. Han, and S. K. Lee, “Free radicals as triggers of brain edema formation after stroke,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 51–70, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Qin, K. D. Buxton, S. Pepe et al., “Reperfusion-induced myocardial dysfunction is prevented by endogenous annexin-A1 and its N-terminal-derived peptide Ac-ANX-A12-26,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 238–252, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Gong, Y. N. Ju, X. T. Wang, J. L. Zhu, Z. H. Jin, and W. Gao, “Ac2-26 ameliorates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury via the eNOS pathway,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 117, p. 109194, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. McArthur, E. Cristante, M. Paterno et al., “Annexin A1: a central player in the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective role of microglia,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 10, pp. 6317–6328, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Krohn, J. Dreßler, M. Bauer, K. Schober, H. Franke, and B. Ondruschka, “Immunohistochemical investigation of S100 and NSE in cases of traumatic brain injury and its application for survival time determination,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 430–440, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. Abdel-Magied, S. M. Shedid, and A. G. Ahmed, “Mitigating effect of biotin against irradiation-induced cerebral cortical and hippocampal damage in the rat brain tissue,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 13441–13452, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Lorente, M. M. Martín, P. Abreu-González et al., “Association between serum malondialdehyde levels and mortality in patients with severe brain trauma injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Yu, Y. Liang, Z. Huang, D. W. Jones, K. A. Pritchard Jr., and H. Zhang, “Inhibition of myeloperoxidase oxidant production by N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide reduces brain damage in a murine model of stroke,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 119, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Zhu, X. Wang, L. Qiu, C. Peeters-Scholte, H. Hagberg, and K. Blomgren, “Nitrosylation precedes caspase-3 activation and translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor in neonatal rat cerebral hypoxia-ischaemia,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 462–471, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Peleli, C. Zollbrecht, M. F. Montenegro et al., “Enhanced XOR activity in eNOS-deficient mice,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 99, pp. 472–484, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Q. Li and I. M. Verma, “NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 725–734, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Sun, J. Ma, D. Li et al., “Interleukin-10 inhibits interleukin-1β production and inflammasome activation of microglia in epileptic seizures,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 66, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Dimmeler, I. Fleming, B. Fisslthaler, C. Hermann, R. Busse, and A. M. Zeiher, “Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6736, pp. 601–605, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. A. Sugimoto, J. P. Vago, M. M. Teixeira, and L. P. Sousa, “Annexin A1 and the resolution of inflammation: modulation of neutrophil recruitment, apoptosis, and clearance,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 8239258, 13 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Jing Gong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views183
Downloads243
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.