Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5521050 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5521050

Yangyang Li, Li Jin, Jing Yan, Hong Zhang, Rong Zhang, Cheng Hu, "CD28 Genetic Variants Increase Susceptibility to Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Case Control Study", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2021, Article ID 5521050, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5521050

CD28 Genetic Variants Increase Susceptibility to Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Case Control Study

Academic Editor: Joilson O. Martins
Received06 Jan 2021
Revised12 Mar 2021
Accepted31 Mar 2021
Published19 Apr 2021

Abstract

Few studies have illuminated the genetic role of T cell costimulatory molecule CD28/CD80/CTLA4 variants in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) susceptibility. We aimed to investigate the causal role of genetic polymorphisms in CD28/CD80/CTLA4 with DKD susceptibility in patients with T2DM. A total of 3253 patients with T2DM were recruited for genotyping: including 204 DKD patients and 371 controls in stage 1 and 819 DKD patients and 563 controls in stage 2; besides, 1296 T2DM patients were selected for the analysis of association between loci and DKD-related traits. A subset of 227 T2DM patients (118 patients with DKD and 109 patients without DKD) from the total population above were selected to assess serum soluble CD28 (sCD28) levels. Then, we performed a candidate gene association study to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with DKD susceptibility and further used those SNPs to perform Mendelian randomization analyses of serum sCD28 level and DKD susceptibility. Under additive genetic models, CD28-rs3116494 ( [95% CI 1.11, 1.51], ) and CD80-rs3850890 ( [95% CI 1.02, 1.31], ) were associated with DKD susceptibility adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of diabetes, and HbA1c. CD28-rs3116494 was associated with serum sCD28 level ( [95% CI 0.08, 0.44], ). The Mendelian randomization analysis showed that CD28-rs3116494 played a causal role in DKD by influencing serum sCD28 levels ( [95% CI 0.46, 1.83], ). In conclusion, we identified that two novel SNPs, CD28-rs3116494 and CD80-rs3850890, were associated with DKD susceptibility. Using the Mendelian randomization analysis, our study provided evidence for a causal relationship between serum CD28 levels and DKD with T2DM in the Chinese population.

1. Introduction

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), which remains a leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality [13]. The prevalence of DKD in type II DM (T2DM) is approximately 30-50% among US diabetic adults [4]. It is recognized that intensive glucose control reduces the risk of DKD [5]. Despite advances in glycemic control therapies, the development of ESRD remains a growing problem globally, and it has generated a substantial public health burden over the past 2 decades [2, 6]. However, under similar durations of diabetes and comparable blood glucose concentrations, the occurrence, progression, and regression of DKD are highly variable in T2DM [7]. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial showed that intensive glycemic control does not prevent from DKD in some patients, while others with poor glycemic control did not develop DKD [8, 9]. Other risk factors for DKD in diabetics should not be ignored, including gender, obesity, hypertension, inflammation, resistance to insulin, hypovitaminosis D, and dyslipidaemia [10]. Moreover, a hereditary component to DKD has been recognized for a long time, and many genetic loci in specific genes have been identified to be associated with DKD. Patients with different genetic backgrounds have different metabolic, immunologic, and hemodynamic features, which ultimately leads to discrepancies in disease susceptibility [8, 11, 12].

Recent studies have reported increased macrophage and T lymphocyte infiltration in patients with DKD [1316]. This emphasized the possibility that activated T lymphocytes, macrophages, and related immunologic responses were associated with DKD. Elevated levels of plasma inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, were also observed in animal models and patients with DKD [17, 18]. Immunological responses are initiated by T lymphocyte activation through major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) and costimulatory molecules. The costimulatory molecules are important signals to elicit an effective immune response. CD28, which interacts with B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86), is crucial for T cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) that is expressed on T helper cells negatively regulates T cell activation [1921]. Recent studies have demonstrated that aberrant production of CD28 was associated with autoimmune diseases, suggesting that the presence of aberrant costimulatory molecules might lead to immunopathogenesis in allergic inflammation and related diseases [20, 22, 23].

Additionally, B7-1, as a novel biomarker for podocyte damage, was suggested to be a potential therapeutic target for most chronic kidney diseases, and a clinical trial for B7-1 blockade in nephrotic syndrome patients is currently ongoing [2426]. Fiorina et al. showed that high glucose levels in DKD upregulated B7-1 expression in podocytes in vitro and in vivo. Further, podocyte B7-1 expression was only observed in an early phase of DKD in patients with T2DM and absent in those without DKD and individuals with diffused glomerulosclerosis. They suggested B7-1 to be a feature of a subgroup of patients with T2DM exhibiting progressive decline in glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. Circulating T cells can be active and can exacerbate podocyte injury via the CD28/B7-1 pathway. Moreover, they proposed that Abatacept, a T cell costimulation inhibitor, could improve DKD in animal models [23, 27]. However, contradictory reports showed that B7-1 cannot be induced in podocytes from patients with DKD and, in animal models, was not a therapeutic target for DKD [26, 28]. In light of these controversial reports on the role of the CD28/B7-1 pathway in DKD, population studies based on genetics could be useful in identifying the role of these costimulatory molecules in humans. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the causal relationship between circulating soluble CD28 (sCD28) and DKD in individuals with CD28-related genetic polymorphisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Phenotype Definition

We recruited 3253 patients with T2DM from the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism in Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China. T2DM was diagnosed using the oral glucose tolerance test based on the World Health Organization criteria: or a 2 h plasma glucose after an . Patients with type 1 diabetes, maturity-onset diabetes of the young, mitochondrial diabetes, infections, abnormal liver function, cancer, and a medical history of other renal diseases were excluded. DKD was diagnosed as or in patients with T2DM.

Patients with T2DM () without diabetic retinopathy (DR) and impaired kidney function ( or ) were considered controls. Thus, the control subjects in the present study had a higher duration of diabetes than those with DKD. Additionally, control individuals had and . This study was conducted in two stages: in stage 1, 575 patients with T2DM, including 204 with DKD and 371 controls, were recruited; in stage 2, 1382 patients with T2DM, including 891 with DKD and 563 controls, were recruited. Furthermore, we recruited an additional 1296 unselected patients (in these patients, the criteria for inclusion/exclusion, such as duration of diabetes, DR, eGFR, and uAER, were not considered or met) with T2DM in stage 2 for analysis of renal function-related traits to avoid discontinuous traits.

2.2. Clinical Measurement

The anthropometric data of all 3253 patients were recorded, including age, sex, height, weight, and T2DM duration. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height2. Fasting venous blood samples were collected for DNA extraction, and serum samples were isolated and stored at -80°C until use. Clinical parameters, such as serum creatinine and HbA1c, were measured. DR was diagnosed by fundus photography performed using a 45-degree 6.3-megapixel digital nonmydriatic camera (Canon CR6-45NM, Lake Success, NY, USA). The CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation was used to calculate eGFR [29].

2.3. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Selection and Genotyping

In stage 1, 26 SNPs in CD28, CTLA4, and CD80 gene regions were genotyped in patients with and without DKD as a case-control study ( [204 patients with DKD and 371 patients without DKD]), according to the Hapmap3 project and 1000 genome project [30, 31]. The SNPs (rs3116494 and rs3850890) that showed marginal association with DKD () were further genotyped in stage 2 (case-control group, [819 patients with DKD and 563 patients without DKD]). Another 1296 patients with T2DM were recruited for DKD-related trait analysis.

SNPs were genotyped using a MassARRAY system (MassARRAY Compact Analyzer, Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). Quality controls were conducted in genotyping data, including SNP concordance rate in , , , and the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test (Hardy–Weinberg proportions were rejected at ).

2.4. Serum sCD28 Measurement

A subset of 227 T2DM patients (118 patients with DKD and 109 patients without DKD) from the total population above were selected to determine serum sCD28 levels by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the Human CD28 ELISA kit (catalogue RAB1327; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Genetic epidemiologic analyses were performed using PLINK [32] (version 1.9) and R (version 3.6.3). Normality tests were performed, and skewed quantitative traits were log transformed. Logistic regression was used to compare the genotype distributions between DKD and control groups under an additive model adjusted for confounding factors. Pearson’s correlation analysis and Spearman’s rank correlation test were used to analyze the association between serum sCD28 levels and different traits. Student’s -tests and one-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare serum sCD28 levels between individuals with different genotypes. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the continuous traits. Odds ratios (OR) or s with 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented in reference to the minor alleles. Combined analysis of the two study stages was conducted by comprehensive meta-analysis (v2.2.057). Fixed or random effects models were chosen after testing for heterogeneity by Cochran’s test. The R package MendelianRandomization was used to perform Mendelian randomization analyses using the inverse-variance weighted method [33]. According to the statistical power determined by the Quanto 1.2 software, our total sample had >90% power to detect an estimated effect size () of variants with a minor allele frequency of 0.1 at a 0.05 significance level for rs3116494 and estimated effect size () of variants with a minor allele frequency of 0.45 at a significance of 0.05 for rs3850890. The sample size used for the detection of serum sCD28 () had 95% power to detect the medium effect size (0.5) based on two-sided -tests with 0.05 significance level, as determined by the G power 3.1 software.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients are presented in Table 1. In stage 1, patients in the control group had longer T2DM durations () and higher HbA1c levels (). Similar to stage 1, in stage 2 as well, the control group had longer T2DM durations () and higher HbA1c levels ().


TraitsStage 1 ()Stage 2 ()Unselected T2DM patients for DKD-related traits ()
DKDControl valueDKDControl value

Male/female126/78193/1780.0245591/228315/248<0.0001632/664
Age (years)<0.0001<0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2)<0.0001<0.0001
Duration of diabetes (years)10.00 (5.00, 15.00)12.00 (10.00, 17.00)<0.000110.00 (4.00, 14.00)14.00 (10.00, 17.00)<0.00017.00 (3.00, 12.00)
HbA1c (%)8.90 (7.00, 9.90)9.10 (7.50, 10.20)0.05057.10 (6.30, 8.40)8.20 (7.10, 9.50)<0.00018.00 (6.90, 9.80)
DR (%)36.70%0%34.62%0%25.92%
Plasma creatinine (μmol/L)76.00 (59.00, 103.00)56.00 (50.00, 66.00)<0.0001121.00 (84.80, 168.00)63.50 (55.00, 73.00)<0.000165.00 (54.00, 78.00)
eGFR (mL/(min·1.73 m2))85.01 (72.30, 95.01)103.19 (93.88, 112.11)<0.000183.06 (72.13, 95.00)106.32 (97.49, 114.90)<0.000198.40 (86.82, 107.97)
Urinary albumin excretion rate (mg/24 h)128.13 (68.69, 315.00)7.68 (2.88, 14.54)<0.0001106.46 (72.14, 295.21)9.37 (3.53, 16.12)<0.000118.12 (6.45, 30.23)

Data are shown as or median (interquartile range). The chi-square test was used to analyze the proportion. Student’s -test was used for normally distributed traits. The Wilcoxon test was used for skewed distributed traits. was considered statistically significant. HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c; DR: diabetic retinopathy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
3.2. Association of CD28-Related Genetic Variants with DKD

In stage 1, we genotyped the 7, 7, and 12 SNPs in CD28, CTLA4, and CD80 gene regions, respectively. The base positions of SNPs are shown in Figures 1(a)1(c). Associations between the 26 SNPs studied in stage 1 and DKD, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c levels, are shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Figures 1(a)1(c). We found a significant association of DKD with rs3116494 in the CD28 gene region () and a marginal association with rs3850890 in the CD80 gene region () in stage 1. In stage 2, these SNPs, rs3116494 () and rs3850890 (), were also associated with DKD. We then performed meta-analysis for rs3116494 and rs3850890 to combine the results of the two stages; as shown in Figures 1(d) and 1(e), under a fixed effects model (), rs3116494 was significantly associated with DKD ( [95% CI 1.11, 1.51], ). Similarly, under a fixed effects model (), rs3850890 was significantly associated with DKD ( [95% CI 1.02, 1.31], ). We further performed interaction analysis of CD28-rs3116494 and CD80-rs3850890 with DKD and found a risk-allele dose-dependent effect on DKD occurrence (); subjects carrying the rs3116494 G allele and rs3850890 TT genotype showed the highest prevalence of DKD (Figure 1(f)).

3.3. Association of Validated SNPs with DKD-Related Traits

We tested the association of the validated SNPs with DKD-related traits, including serum creatinine, eGFR, and uAER. As shown in Table 2, the presence of the minor allele G of rs3116494 and the minor allele C of rs3850890 exhibited a trend towards increased serum creatinine and uAER and decreased eGFR; the direction of these effects was similar to those of DKD risk, although we did not have significant results. Although we obtained similar results in stage 2, the statistical power was limited. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to combine the results; there was no heterogeneity detected in the two stages (). The meta-analysis results showed that both rs3116494 (, , ) and rs3850890 (, , ) were significantly associated with eGFR, and rs3850890 was associated with uAER (, , ).


SNPChrGenePosition (building 37)Minor/major alleleTraitsStage 1 ()Stage 2 ()Meta-analysis
SE valueSE valueSE value

rs31164942CD28204592021G/ACreatinine3.342.470.17635.593.540.11434.082.030.0442
eGFR-3.271.890.0836-3.912.410.1047-3.511.490.0181
uAER10.867.340.13902.752.080.18613.352.000.0939

rs38508903CD80119265619C/TCreatinine2.161.680.19851.881.960.33752.041.280.1095
eGFR-2.371.570.1312-2.971.340.0267-2.721.020.0077
uAER19.9411.160.07402.611.190.02832.801.180.0178

values were calculated by multiple linear regression under an additive genetic model adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c; the effect values were evaluated by minor allele. was considered statistically significant. Chr: chromosome; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; uAER: urinary albumin excretion rate.
3.4. Serum sCD28 Levels in DKD and Control Groups

We referred to the transcriptomic database obtained from renal tissue from subjects with DKD and controls (http://www.nephroseq.org) and found that the CD28 expression was higher in the kidneys of patients with DKD (, ), but CD80 and CTLA4 expression showed no differences. We further explored the role of plasma sCD28 protein in DKD. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these 227 patients are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Similar to the total study population, duration of T2DM and HbA1c levels were higher in control than those in the DKD group. Owing to the limited sensitivity of ELISA, sCD28 could not be detected in all individuals, 21% in T2DM without DKD and 4% in T2DM with DKD (Figure 2(a)). Serum sCD28 levels did not differ based on the sex (Figure 2(b)) as well as the age (Figure 2(c)) of patients. Further, we found that the control group, comprising patients with long-term T2DM without DKD and DR, showed significantly lower levels of serum sCD28 compared to that in the DKD group () (Supplementary Table 2). We then stratified the individuals into tertiles based on sCD28 levels (low sCD28 [0.00-0.48 ng/mL], middle sCD28 [0.49-0.87 ng/mL], and high sCD28 [0.87-5.65 ng/mL]) and found that patients having high plasma sCD28 levels had the highest DKD risk; a total of 0.8% in the high sCD28 group but only 0.33% in the low sCD28 group had DKD (Figure 3(a)).

3.5. Association of Serum sCD28 Levels with DKD-Related Traits

Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that serum sCD28 levels were significantly associated with DKD-related traits: eGFR (, ), plasma creatinine (, ), and uAER (, ) (Figures 2(e)2(g)). However, according to Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, sCD28 was not associated with age, gender, BMI, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c, while significant results similar to those obtained by Pearson’s correlation analysis were observed for DKD-related traits (Supplementary Table 3). Further, we performed multiple linear regression analysis between sCD28 levels and DKD-related traits after adjusting for the confounding factors of age, gender, and BMI in model 1 and age, gender, BMI, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c in model 2; the results for both statistical models were significant (Supplementary Table 3): serum creatinine (, ; respectively), eGFR (, ; respectively), and uAER (, ; respectively). We also analyzed DKD-related traits according to the sCD28 tertiles. Trend tests using logistic regressions were conducted to assess the associations. The results showed the highest levels of plasma creatinine (), highest uAER (), and lowest eGFR () were in the high sCD28 group (Figures 3(b)3(d)).

3.6. Association of Validated SNPs with Serum sCD28 Levels and Mendelian Randomization Analysis

The association of validated SNPs with serum sCD28 levels was also analyzed in this study. rs3116494 was associated with serum sCD28 level ( [95% CI 0.08, 0.44], ). As the percentage of subjects with the rs3116494 GG genotype was low, we combined GA and GG genotypes as one group. As shown in Supplementary Figure 1, individuals carrying the rs3116494 G allele had higher serum sCD28 levels compared to the carriers of A allele homozygosis (); however, the genotypes of rs3850890 were not associated with serum sCD28 levels (Figure 4). Mendelian randomization analysis using inverse-variance weighted methods indicated that elevated levels of the circulating costimulatory molecule sCD28 play a causal role in DKD ( [95% CI 0.46, 1.83], ).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we analyzed the causal relationship of the circulating costimulatory molecule sCD28 and its related genetic variants with DKD. We divided the patients into DKD and control groups. Notably, the controls had higher duration of the T2DM and did not have DR. Thus, control individuals were relatively resistant to DKD. Therefore, a genetic association study in our sample population may help to detect the genetic loci associated with DKD susceptibility. We identified 2 novel SNPs (rs3116494 and rs3850890) that were significantly associated with DKD susceptibility. Furthermore, the association of the two SNPs with the occurrence of DKD in the present study suggested the potential interactive role of CD28 and CD80 in DKD. Additionally, Nephroseq analysis revealed that CD28, but not CD80 and CTLA4, was differentially expressed in the kidneys of patients with DKD compared to that in the healthy controls. Therefore, we further analyzed sCD28 protein levels in circulation with respect to DKD susceptibility and related traits. We found a significantly lower level of sCD28 in controls than in the DKD group. Additionally, serum sCD28 level was significantly associated with serum creatinine, eGFR, and uAER. Moreover, the CD28-rs3116494 genotype was also found to be significantly associated with sCD28 levels. Mendelian randomization analysis indicated that rs3116494 played a causal role in DKD by influencing serum sCD28 levels.

We conducted the present study in two stages to determine the genetic association; we found that the patients with rs3116494-G or rs3850890-C alleles had a higher risk for DKD. Through interactive analysis, we also found the two SNPs were interactive on DKD. Patients with the AA genotype of rs3116494 and the CC genotype of rs3850890 had the lowest prevalence of DKD, while carriers of the rs3116494 G allele and the rs3850890 T allele homozygosis had the highest prevalence. This suggested that CD28 and CD80 have a combined role in DKD. Further, we also analyzed the association of these SNPs with eGFR, uAER, and creatinine, which are widely considered biomarkers for the DKD phenotype. We found that rs3116494-G was associated with decreased eGFR and increased serum creatinine, while rs3850890-C was associated with decreased eGFR and increased uAER. These findings verified that the DKD risk alleles of the two SNPs were associated with impaired kidney function in patients with T2DM.

More DKD- and kidney function-related genetic variants have been discovered in recent years. However, most loci were located in noncoding regions, and the concerned biological explanations remain elusive. Gene expression and tissue-specific eQTL data are powerful tools to obtain functional annotations for these variants. Thus, we analyzed gene expression and eQTL data according to Nephroseq and GTEx databases. According to the Nephroseq, we found that expression of CD28 was higher in kidney biopsy samples of patients with DKD than in those of healthy living donors (, ), while the expression of CD80 and CTLA4 showed no difference (). Increased CD28 expression in kidneys might be associated with T cell infiltration in patients with DKD. Furthermore, to better understand the SNPs in the present genetic association study, we performed eQTL analysis according to the GTEx Portal [34, 35]. Based on the single-tissue eQTL map (Figure S1), rs3116494-G (DKD risk allele in our study) was associated with an increased CD28 expression in most of the tissues including the tibial artery (, ), coronary artery (, ), heart (, ), visceral adipose (, ), and small intestine in the terminal ileum (, ). Additionally, rs3116494 was also identified by the genome-wide association studies in inflammatory bowel disease (, , ) and ulcerative colitis (, , ), where the G allele carriers had higher risk for both diseases [36, 37]. These results suggested an autoimmunity regulatory function for rs3116494. The SNP was also marginally associated with CD28 expression in the whole blood (, ). However, we did not find an association between rs3850890 and CD80 expression using the GTEx Portal (expression data in bone marrow or lymphoid tissue was unavailable). Besides, we did not find an association between rs3116494 and CD28 gene expression in kidneys. Our results suggested that rs3116494 might not influence the CD28 gene expression in the kidneys but may do so in other tissues like the artery, visceral adipose, and blood. Thus, the association of rs3116494 with DKD may be attributed to system immunology.

We further explored the role of serum sCD28 protein level in DKD in a subset of patients with T2DM. The patient characteristics in the DKD and control groups were similar to those in the total study population. Significantly lower sCD28 levels were observed in patients with long-term T2DM without DKD and DR as compared to those with DKD. The results suggested that low level of sCD28 in circulation might be responsible for DKD tolerance. Additionally, sCD28 levels were positively associated with serum creatinine and uAER and negatively associated eGFR. We also observed an association of rs3116494 with serum sCD28 levels in our population; the G allele carriers had higher sCD28 levels. As independent analyses showed that the rs3116494 G allele and increased sCD28 levels were associated with a high risk of DKD and that the rs3116494 G carriers had higher sCD28 levels, we further performed a Mendelian randomization analysis that is a widely used approach to determine causal relationship in a cross-sectional study. Considering rs3116494 as a genetic tool and serum sCD28 as an intermediate variable, we analyzed the causation relationship between serum sCD28 and DKD. The results showed a significant causal relationship of sCD28 in DKD. This further verified the role of CD28 in human DKD.

The strengths of this study were that obviously disease susceptibility differs depending on whether the cases were DKD or control. The study had certain limitations: first, we did not have available data on medications including ACEI/ARB inhibitors, and these factors may influence the phenotype of DKD. Second, we could not assess the T cell immunity status of in the study population as the relevant data was not available. Third, lifestyle factors were not considered in this study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study identified novel DKD-related SNPs in the CD28 gene region in a Chinese population. Moreover, based on the method of Mendelian randomization analysis, our study provided evidence for a causal relationship between circulating costimulatory molecular sCD28 and DKD.

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Yangyang Li and Li Jin contributed equally to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism in Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital for collecting the data. We also thank all study participants for their participation and contributions. Besides, we thank Wiley for their help in the English language editing of this manuscript. The current study was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFC1304902), the Outstanding Academic Leaders of Shanghai Health System Program (2017BR008), the Yangtze River Scholar Program, the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (81974118), and the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152527). The study was also supported by a grant from the Three-Year Project of Shanghai TCM Development (ZY(2018-2020)-FWTX-2003). Our project was also supported by the Key project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (20171ACH80002).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1: single-tissue eQTL map of rs3116494 with expression of CD28 in the GTEx database. Supplementary Table 1: association of SNPs in CD28, CTLA4, and B7-1 (CD80) with DKD. Supplementary Table 2: demographic and clinical characteristics of 227 patients included for serum sCD28 level determination. Supplementary Table 3: association of serum sCD28 level with clinical traits. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. K. R. Tuttle, G. L. Bakris, R. W. Bilous et al., “Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference,” Diabetes Care, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2864–2883, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. H. de Boer, T. C. Rue, Y. N. Hall, P. J. Heagerty, N. S. Weiss, and J. Himmelfarb, “Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 305, no. 24, pp. 2532–2539, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Group AC, A. Patel, S. Mac Mahon et al., “Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, pp. 2560–2572, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. E. Pavkov, W. C. Knowler, P. H. Bennett, H. C. Looker, J. Krakoff, and R. G. Nelson, “Increasing incidence of proteinuria and declining incidence of end-stage renal disease in diabetic Pima Indians,” Kidney International, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1840–1846, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Patel, M. Bose, and M. E. Cooper, “Glucose and blood pressure-dependent pathways-the progression of diabetic kidney disease,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 2218, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. J. Olshansky, D. J. Passaro, R. C. Hershow et al., “A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 11, pp. 1138–1145, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. O. Gheith, N. Farouk, N. Nampoory, M. A. Halim, and T. Al-Otaibi, “Diabetic kidney disease: worldwide difference of prevalence and risk factors,” Journal of Nephropharmacology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  8. “Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): results of feasibility study. The DCCT Research Group,” The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. King, I. Peacock, and R. Donnelly, “The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 643–648, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. H. de Boer, M. Afkarian, T. C. Rue et al., “Renal outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes and macroalbuminuria,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2342–2350, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Ahlqvist, N. R. van Zuydam, L. C. Groop, and M. I. McCarthy, “The genetics of diabetic complications,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 277–287, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Sandholm and P. H. Groop, “Genetic basis of diabetic kidney disease and other diabetic complications,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development., vol. 50, pp. 17–24, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. C. Wilson, H. Wu, Y. Kirita et al., “The single-cell transcriptomic landscape of early human diabetic nephropathy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., vol. 116, no. 39, pp. 19619–19625, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Fan, Z. Yi, V. D. D’Agati et al., “Comparison of kidney transcriptomic profiles of early and advanced diabetic nephropathy reveals potential new mechanisms for disease progression,” Diabetes, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2301–2314, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Park, Y. Guan, X. Sheng et al., “Functional methylome analysis of human diabetic kidney disease,” JCI Insight., vol. 4, no. 11, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. M.-K. Tang, D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, and H.-Y. Lan, “Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 144–158, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Wada and H. Makino, “Innate immunity in diabetes and diabetic nephropathy,” Nature Reviews Nephrology., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. F. Navarro-González, C. Mora-Fernández, M. M. de Fuentes, and J. García-Pérez, “Inflammatory molecules and pathways in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 327–340, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. K. Kuchroo, M. P. Das, J. A. Brown et al., “B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules activate differentially the Th1/Th2 developmental pathways: application to autoimmune disease therapy,” Cell, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 707–718, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Seyda, A. Elkhal, M. Quante, C. S. Falk, and S. G. Tullius, “T cells going innate,” Trends in Immunology., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 546–556, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Nagai and M. Azuma, “The CD28-B7 family of co-signaling molecules,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., vol. 1189, pp. 25–51, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. P. Andrews, H. Yano, and D. A. A. Vignali, “Inhibitory receptors and ligands beyond PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4: breakthroughs or backups,” Nature Immunology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1425–1434, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. T. Prendergast, A. Patakas, S. Al-Khabouri et al., “Visualising the interaction of CD4 T cells and DCs in the evolution of inflammatory arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 579–588, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Goldwich, M. Burkard, M. Ölke et al., “Podocytes are nonhematopoietic professional antigen-presenting cells,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 906–916, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Mundel, “Podocytes and the quest for precision medicines for kidney diseases,” Pflugers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology., vol. 469, no. 7-8, pp. 1029–1037, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Novelli, A. Benigni, and G. Remuzzi, “The role of B7-1 in proteinuria of glomerular origin,” Nature Reviews Nephrology., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 589–596, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Fiorina, A. Vergani, R. Bassi et al., “Role of podocyte B7-1 in diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1415–1429, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. Gagliardini, R. Novelli, D. Corna et al., “B7-1 is not induced in podocytes of human and experimental diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 999–1005, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. A. Stevens, M. A. Claybon, C. H. Schmid et al., “Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimating the glomerular filtration rate in multiple ethnicities,” Kidney International., vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 555–562, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. The International HapMap 3 Consortium, “Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7311, pp. 52–58, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. H. Sudmant, The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, T. Rausch et al., “An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes,” Nature, vol. 526, no. 7571, pp. 75–81, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Purcell, B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown et al., “PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses,” American Journal of Human Genetics., vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 559–575, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. O. O. Yavorska and S. Burgess, “MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data,” International Journal of Epidemiology., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1734–1739, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. T. Consortium, “Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans,” Science, vol. 348, no. 6235, pp. 648–660, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. G. T. Consortium, “The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project,” Nature Genetics, vol. 45, pp. 580–585, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Z. Liu, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, S. van Sommeren et al., “Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations,” Nature Genetics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 979–986, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Welter, J. MacArthur, J. Morales et al., “The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. D1, pp. D1001–D1006, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yangyang Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views256
Downloads344
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.