Review Article

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It a Plausible Alternative to the Traditional Four-Port Laparoscopic Approach?

Table 2

Comparison of clinical trials comparing SILC versus 4PLC—SILC/LESSC (single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy/laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy), 4PLC (four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

StudyStudy type YearNo. of patientsInclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaPrimary outcomesSecondary outcomesMean operative
time (min)
SILC/LESSCLC

Tsimoyiannis et al. [12]Prospective, randomized 201040BMI < 30, pain from cholelithiasis, ASA class I or IIBMI > 30, acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis or acute pancreatitisPostoperative pain* (less pain in SILSC group)NR *

Marks et al. and Phillips et al. (same cohort of patients) [13, 14]Prospective, randomized, 2011200BMI < 45, diagnosis of biliary colic, with gallstones or polyps, biliary dyskinesia EF < 30%.Pregnancy, acute cholecystitis, preoperative indication for cholangiogram, ASA class III or IV, peritoneal dialysis, umbilical herniaIntraoperative, postoperative complications (up to 1 yr)*, operative time*, and estimated blood loss.Pain evaluation* (less pain in 4PLC group), cosmesis*, quality of life, time required for insertion of SILS/LESSC port versus LC ports57.2*45.2

Lai et al. [15]Prospective, randomized, 201151Age 18–80 yrs, diagnosis of symptomatic gallstones or polyps scheduled for elective cholecystectomyASA class IV or V, contraindication to laparoscopy, the Mirizzi syndrome, suspected common duct stones, suspected malignancy, previous upper abdominal surgery, long-term anticoagulation, previous history of cholangitis/cholecystitis, gallstones >3 cm, contracted gallbladder or chronic cholecystitisPostoperative pain* (less pain in LC group)Open conversion rate, surgical complications, hospital stay, resumption of normal life, cosmesis

Lee et al. [16]+Prospective, randomized 201070Symptomatic colelithiasis, ASA class I or IIAcute cholecystitis, common bile duct stones, severe obesity and previous upper abdominal surgeryPostoperative painDuration of surgery, complications, analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay*, cosmesis*, wound length*, time to return to work *

Bucher et al. [17]Prospective, randomized 2011150Elective patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, history of cholecystitis, history of common bile duct stone migration and/or biliary pancreatitis, age > 18 yrsAcute gallbladder disease, contraindications to pneumoperitoneum, cirrhosis, mental impairmentCosmesis*Postoperative pain* (less in SILC/LESSC group), analgesia requirement*, satisfaction*, morbidity, duration of operation, need for main port expansion for specimen retraction*, hospital stay, return to work* and operative costs*66 (no SD reported)64 (no SD reported)

Ma et al. [18]Prospective, randomized 201143Indications for LC with no evidence of choledocholithiasis, age 18–85 yrs, BMI < 40, creatinine < 2 mg/dL, AST/ALT <5x upper limit of lab normal, normal total bilirubinAcute cholecystitis, gallstones >2.5 cmPostoperative painOperative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, QOL, cosmesis88.5*44.8

Lirici et al. [19]Prospective, randomized 201140age 18–75, BMI < 30, no previous abdominal surgery, gallstones on US exam. ASA class I–III, Nassar grade I–IIIBMI > 30, previous abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, bile duct stones, pancreatitis, ASA class > III, Nassar grade IVLength of stay, postoperative pain* (higher with SILC/LESSC on the day of surgery, rest NS), cosmetic results*, SF-36 questionnaire scores* (Role Emotional only, rest NS)Operative time*, conversion to LC, difficulty of exposure*, difficulty to dissect, complication rate76.75*48.25

Gang et al. [20]Prospective, matched pair analysis 2011134 SILC/LESSC patients matched to LC controls Completion rate, operating time, postoperative complications, length of stay, postoperative pain *

+SILC versus mini laparoscopic procedure.
*Statistically significant difference.