Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2012, Article ID 454120, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/454120
Research Article

A Novel Technique for Transvaginal Retrieval of Enlarged Pelvic Viscera during Minimally Invasive Surgery

Divsion of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 11000 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Received 23 March 2012; Accepted 30 April 2012

Academic Editor: Peng Hui Wang

Copyright © 2012 Allison Wyman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Scandola, L. Grespan, M. Vicentini, and P. Fiorini, “Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five meta analyses,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 705–715.
  2. D. Sarlos and L. A. Kots, “Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 283–288, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. P. Pasic, J. A. Rizzo, H. Fang, S. Ross, M. Moore, and C. Gunnarsson, “Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 730–738, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Debernardo, D. Starks, N. Barker, A. Armstrong, and C. A. Kunos, “. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology,” Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2011, Article ID 139867, 9 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. N. Jain, State of the Art Atlas of Endoscopic Surgery in Infertility and Gynecology, Jaypee Brothers, 2004.