Minimally Invasive Surgery

Minimally Invasive Surgery / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Current Advances and Evidence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 508415 |

Richard G. Fessler, Zachary A. Smith, Nicholas Slimack, Justin S. Smith, Richard J. Parkinson, "Current Advances and Evidence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery", Minimally Invasive Surgery, vol. 2012, Article ID 508415, 1 page, 2012.

Current Advances and Evidence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Received10 Dec 2012
Accepted10 Dec 2012
Published30 Dec 2012

It has been our privilege to serve as Guest Editors for this special focusing on the topic of current advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Given the continuous and rapid advancement of spine technologies and techniques, an issue such as this can only begin by describing many of the advances in the field. However, with the critical help of our contributors, we hope this issue provides the readers with a better understanding of modern minimally invasive spine surgery.

The primary goal of minimally invasive surgery is to minimize procedure-related morbidity. Commonly, this is reflected in diminished tissue injury, less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and decreased postoperative pain. To reflect this, two articles have discussed outcomes with two more established and commonly applied techniques. A. Wong and colleagues review the current literature reported on outcome data following the minimally invasive treatment of lumbar stenosis. Similarly, A. Habib and colleagues review outcomes following minimally invasive TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion).

Minimally invasive techniques were first applied to a more focused scope of surgical indications. However, more recent advances have allowed surgeons to use these techniques for more challenging pathologies. Consistent with this, a number of articles in this issue address the technical nuances of these advanced techniques. For instance, F. De Iure and colleagues describe their experience in 122 patients treated with percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. M. Wang describes and presents outcomes of a less invasive technique for the percutaneous placement of iliac screws. Additional articles address such topics as advances in interspinous fixation, the use of fenestrated screw technology, and operative corridors for minimally invasive corpectomy.


We would like to thank the participating authors for their time and contributions to this special issue. We have been fortunate to have the valued contributions of both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, each with a wealth of unique and rich experiences in the field. In addition, we would like to thank the editors and staff of the journal for their support, expertise, and patience during this undertaking. We hope this issue will act as a resource to stimulate further advances in the field and allow us to continuously improve the lives and health of our patients.

Richard G. Fessler
Zachary A. Smith
Nicholas Slimack
Justin S. Smith
Richard J. Parkinson

Copyright © 2012 Richard G. Fessler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.