Review Article
Transvaginal Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
Table 3
Results of transvaginal appendectomies.
| Author | Number | Operating time (min) mean (range) | Complications (number) | Conversion to laparoscopy (number) | Length of stay (mean and range) |
| Bernhardt et al. [3] | 1 | NA | No | No | 3 | Tabutsadze and Kipshidze [4] | 2 | 76 & 88 | No | No | 1.25 & 1.5 | Shin et al. [5] | 1 | 60 | No | No | 3 | Zorron et al. [6] | 37 | 60.5 (90 for flexible) | Appendicular artery hemorrhage (3) | Appendicular artery hemorrhage (3) | 1.3 | Pérez et al. [7] | 8 | 48.3 (37–75) | No | No | 1.1 (<1-2) | Noguera et al. [8] | 4 | 61 | No | No | NA | Roberts et al. [10] | 18 | 44.4 | Intra-abdominal abscess (1) Urinary retention (1) Unable to sustain pneumoperitoneum (1) | Unable to sustain pneumoperitoneum (1) | 1.1 | Albrecht et al. [9] | 30 | 44.3 | Urinary infection (1) Dyspareunia (2) | No | 3.4 | Jacobsen et al. [12] | 3 | 71 (55–80) | NA | No | NA | Arezzo et al. [13] | 5 | Rigid: 42.5 (40–45) Flexible: 70 (60–90) | No | No | Rigid: 1.5 (1-2) Flexible: 1.3 (1-2) | Wada et al. [14] | 1 | 130 | No | No | 1 | Mofid et al. [15] | 2 | 25 & 32 | No | No | NA |
|
|