Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2014, Article ID 562785, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/562785
Clinical Study

Changing Trends in Use of Laparoscopy: A Clinical Audit

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 110095, India
2National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR), Ansari Nagar, Delhi, India

Received 25 June 2014; Revised 20 October 2014; Accepted 22 October 2014; Published 4 December 2014

Academic Editor: Stephen Kavic

Copyright © 2014 Ritu Khatuja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Operative Laparoscopy, ACOG Educational Bulletin no. 239, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  2. A. Darzi and S. Mackay, “Recent advances in minimal access surgery,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7328, pp. 31–34, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. E. Pittaway, P. Takacs, and P. Bauguess, “Laparoscopic adnexectomy: a comparison with laparotomy,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 385–391, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. R. H. Twijnstra, W. Kolkman, G. C. M. Trimbos-Kemper, and F. W. Jansen, “Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 487–492, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. K. Dhaliwal, A. Al-Shafei, and M. Al-Sharqi, “Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology—salmaniya experience,” Bahrain Medical Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 151–155, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Jarrell, “Diagnostic and operative laparoscopy in Alberta 1994–2006,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1045–1049, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Drozgyik, M. Vizer, and I. Szabó, “Significance of laparoscopy in the management of chronic pelvic pain,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 223–226, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Cox, S. Ayers, K. Nala, and J. Penny, “Chronic pelvic pain and quality of life after laparoscopy,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 214–219, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. H. I. Brummer, T. T. Seppälä, and P. S. M. Härkki, “National learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000–2005,” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 840–845, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus