Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2017, Article ID 6907896, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6907896
Clinical Study

Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence should be addressed to Hans C. Rolff; moc.liamg@fflor.ch

Received 15 March 2017; Revised 8 August 2017; Accepted 15 August 2017; Published 6 December 2017

Academic Editor: Casey M. Calkins

Copyright © 2017 Hans C. Rolff et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Kim, S. N. Hochwald, G. A. Sarosi, A. M. Caban, G. Rossidis, and K. Ben-David, “Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 683213, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Mariette, G. Piessen, and J.-P. Triboulet, “Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 545–553, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Okholm, J. P. Goetze, L. B. Svendsen, and M. P. Achiam, “Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1027–1034, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Nafteux, J. Moons, W. Coosemans et al., “Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: A valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1455–1464, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Law, “Is minimally invasive preferable to open oesophagectomy?” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9829, pp. 1856–1858, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. D. Luketich, P. R. Schauer, N. A. Christie et al., “Minimally invasive esophagectomy,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 906–912, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. C. van der Sluis, J. P. Ruurda, S. van der Horst et al., “Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial),” Trials, vol. 13, article 230, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. J. J. Verhage, E. J. Hazebroek, J. Boone, and R. Van Hillegersberg, “Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review of the literature,” Minerva Chirurgica, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Falk, D. Mintz, J. Grunenfelder, J. I. Fann, and T. A. Burdon, “Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1282–1288, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. H. Kernstine, “The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: Initial experience,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 22, no. 9, article 2102, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. T. Nguyen, D. M. Follette, B. M. Wolfe, P. D. Schneider, P. Roberts, and J. Goodnight J.E., “Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy,” JAMA Surgery, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 920–925, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Bresadola, G. Terrosu, A. Cojutti, E. Benzoni, E. Baracchini, and F. Bresadola, “Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study,” Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 63–67, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. NOMESCO NM-SC. NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures. 2009.
  14. D. Cunningham, W. H. Allum, S. P. Stenning et al., “Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and P. Clavien, “Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 205–213, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Slankamenac, R. Graf, J. Barkun, M. A. Puhan, and P.-A. Clavien, “The comprehensive complication index: A novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. B. Svendsen, L. S. Jensen, J. Holm et al., “Differences in the pattern of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy in two high-volume centres,” Danish Medical Journal, vol. 60, no. 12, Article ID A4733, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. P. Cata, J. Lasala, G. Pratt, L. Feng, and J. B. Shah, “Association between perioperative blood transfusions and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing bladder cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis study,” Journal of Blood Transfusion, vol. 2016, Article ID 9876394, 8 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S.-G. Wu, Z.-Q. Zhang, W.-M. Liu et al., “Impact of the number of resected lymph nodes on survival after preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal cancer,” Oncotarget , vol. 7, no. 16, pp. 22497–22507, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. van der Schaaf, A. Johar, B. Wijnhoven, P. Lagergren, and J. Lagergren, “Extent of lymph node removal during esophageal cancer surgery and survival,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 107, no. 5, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Sihag, A. S. Kosinski, H. A. Gaissert, C. D. Wright, and P. H. Schipper, “Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1281–1288, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. S. A. Y. Biere, M. A. Cuesta, and D. L. Van Der Peet, “Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Minerva Chirurgica, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 121–133, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. S. A. Y. Biere, M. I. van Berge Henegouwen, K. W. Maas et al., “Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9829, pp. 1887–1892, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Mamidanna, A. Bottle, P. Aylin, O. Faiz, and G. B. Hanna, “Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: A population-based national study,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 255, no. 2, pp. 197–203, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. F. Herling, C. Palle, A. M. Møller, T. Thomsen, and J. Sørensen, “Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 299–308, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Buse, C. E. Hach, P. Klumpen et al., “Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for the prevention of perioperative complications,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1131–1137, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Briez, G. Piessen, F. Bonnetain et al., “Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial,” BMC Cancer, vol. 11, article 310, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Briez, G. Piessen, F. Torres, G. Lebuffe, J.-P. Triboulet, and C. Mariette, “Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 1547–1553, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Messager, A. Pasquer, A. Duhamel, G. Caranhac, G. Piessen, and C. Mariette, “Laparoscopic gastric mobilization reduces postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer surgery: A French nationwide study,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 262, no. 5, pp. 817–823, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus