Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2018, Article ID 4185840, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4185840
Research Article

The Role of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Scoliosis Correction Surgery

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
2Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael B. Cloney; moc.oohay@yenolc.leahcim

Received 28 August 2017; Accepted 11 December 2017; Published 24 January 2018

Academic Editor: Stephen Kavic

Copyright © 2018 Michael B. Cloney et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Aebi, “The adult scoliosis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 925–948, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Yadla, M. G. Maltenfort, J. K. Ratliff, and J. S. Harrop, “Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review,” Neurosurg Focus, vol. 28, no. E3, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. N. Anand, E. M. Baron, and B. Khandehroo, “Is circumferential minimally invasive surgery effective in the treatment of moderate adult idiopathic scoliosis?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 472, pp. 1762–1768, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. J. Regan, H. Yuan, and P. C. McAfee, “Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: Minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion,” The Spine Journal, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 402–411, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Y. Wang and P. V. Mummaneni, “Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes,” Neurosurg Focus, vol. 28, p. E9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Park and J. W. Ha, “Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach,” The Spine Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 537–543, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Dakwar, R. F. Cardona, D. A. Smith, and J. S. Uribe, “Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis,” Neurosurg Focus, vol. 28, no. 3, p. E8, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  8. N. Anand, R. Rosemann, B. Khalsa, and E. M. Baron, “Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis,” Neurosurg Focus, vol. 28, E6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Bach, A. Ahmadian, A. Deukmedjian, and J. S. Uribe, “Minimally invasive surgical techniques in adult degenerative spinal deformity: a systematic review,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 472, pp. 1749–1761, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Baron and T. J. Albert, “Medical complications of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity and how to avoid them,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 31, pp. S106–118, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. S. Hu, “Blood loss in adult spinal surgery,” European Spine Journal, vol. 13, no. S01, pp. S3–S5, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. N. Anand, E. M. Baron, and S. Kahwaty, “Evidence basis/outcomes in minimally invasive spinal scoliosis surgery,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, vol. 25, pp. 361–375, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Dangelmajer, P. L. Zadnik, S. T. Rodriguez, Z. L. Gokaslan, and D. M. Sciubba, “Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 36, no. 5, p. E7, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. J. Mobbs, P. Sivabalan, and J. Li, “Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 19, pp. 829–835, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. K. Phan, P. J. Rao, A. C. Kam, and R. J. Mobbs, “Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 24, pp. 1017–1030, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. W. A. R. Sulaiman and M. Singh, “Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis,” The Ochsner Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N.-F. Tian and F.-M. Mao, “Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence,” European Spine Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 929-930, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Shunwu, Z. Xing, Z. Fengdong, and F. Xiangqian, “Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases,” The Spine Journal, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 1615–1620, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. E. Isaacs, J. Hyde, J. A. Goodrich, W. B. Rodgers, and F. M. Phillips, “A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications,” The Spine Journal, vol. 35, pp. S322–330, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. F. Kay, S. Chotai, J. B. Wick, D. P. Stonko, M. J. McGirt, and C. J. Devin, “Preoperative and surgical factors associated with postoperative intensive care unit admission following operative treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease,” European Spine Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 843–849, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. A. McCormack, T. Hunter, N. Ramos, R. Michels, L. Hutzler, and J. A. Bosco, “An Analysis of Causes of Readmission After Spine Surgery,” The Spine Journal, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 1260–1266, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. P. Glotzbecker, C. M. Bono, K. B. Wood, and M. B. Harris, “Thromboembolic disease in spinal surgery: a systematic review,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 34, pp. 291–303, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Z. Goldhaber and H. Bounameaux, “Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis,” Lancet, vol. 379, pp. 1835–1846, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. K. Papadimitriou, A. G. Amin, R. M. Kretzer et al., “Thromboembolic events and spinal surgery,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1617–1621, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. H. Berven, V. Deviren, J. A. Smith, S. H. Hu, and D. S. Bradford, “Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: outcome of combined anterior and posterior surgery,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1710–1715, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. O. Kelleher, M. Timlin, O. Persaud, and Y. R. Rampersaud, “Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity,” The Spine Journal, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. E981–E987, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Liu, X. S. Chen, L. S. Jia, and D. W. Song, “The clinical features and surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a review of 112 patients,” Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 1, pp. 176–183, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar