Clinical Study

Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, RCT

Table 2

Operative data.

RoboticLaparoscopicp value
No. 21No. 24

Type of operation
 (i) Anterior resection9 (42.9%)13 (54.2%)
 (ii) Low anterior resection (LAR)7 (33.3%)7 (29.1%)
 (iii) Ultra-LAR4 (19%)1 (4.2%)
 (iv) APR1 (4.8%)3 (12.5%)
Median preparation time (min)55 (39-113)28 (19-80)<0.001
Median actual operative time (min)201 (140-280)134.5 (110-190)<0.001
Median estimated blood loss (ml)200 (50-650)325 (100-800)0.050
Convention to open surgery1 (4.8%)2 (8.3%)
Pathological stage0.203
 (i) II11 (52.4%)17 (70.8%)
 (ii) III10 (47.6%)07 (29.2%)
Median proximal margin (cm)13 (10-20)15 (11-23)0.270
Median distal margin (cm)2.8 (1.4-4)1.8 (1-2.8)<0.001
CRM quality0.079
 (i) Complete18 (85.7%)15 (62.5%)
 (ii) Partly complete03 (14.3%)09 (37.5%)
Median LN retrieved (no.)14 (8-20)13 (9-21)0.498