Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 6130286, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6130286
Review Article

Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review

1Irkutsk State Medical University, Krasnogo Vosstaniya St. 1, Irkutsk, Russia
2Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology, Bortsov Revolutsii St. 1, Irkutsk, Russia
3Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk-Passazhirskiy of Russian Railways Ltd., Botkina St. 10, Irkutsk, Russia
4Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Jubileiniyi 100, Irkutsk, Russia
5National Center of Neurosurgery, 34/1 Turan Av., Astana, Kazakhstan
6Department of Neurosurgery Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, 350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Vadim A. Byvaltsev; ur.xednay@midav57lavyb

Received 27 November 2017; Accepted 20 February 2018; Published 28 March 2018

Academic Editor: Peng Hui Wang

Copyright © 2018 Vadim A. Byvaltsev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Jabbour and N. Chalouhi, “Simulation-based neurosurgical training for the presigmoid approach with a physical model,” Neurosurgery, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. S81–S84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. L. Grubb, W. J. Powers, W. R. Clarke, T. O. Videen, H. P. Adams, and C. P. Derdeyn, “Surgical results of the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W.-Y. Chan, P. Matteucci, and S. J. Southern, “Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: A review,” Microsurgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 494–499, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Regelsberger, O. Heese, P. Horn et al., “Training Microneurosurgery – Four Years Experiences with an in vivo Model,” Central European Neurosurgery, vol. 72, no. 04, pp. 192–195, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. A. Meier, A. Lang, and G. M. Beer, “Training von Mikrogefässanastomosen an Polyurethangefässen zur Reduktion von Tierversuchen,” in ALTEX 21.3/04, vol. 135, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. M. Guler and G. S. Rao, “Canniesburn 'ever-ready' model to practise microsurgery,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 381-382, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. J. Bates, S. M. Wimalawansa, B. Monson, M. C. Rymer, R. Shapiro, and R. M. Johnson, “A simple cost-effective method of microsurgical simulation training: The turkey wing model,” Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 615–618, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Shurey, Y. Akelina, J. Legagneux, G. Malzone, L. Jiga, and A. M. Ghanem, “The rat model in microsurgery education: Classical exercises and new horizons,” Archives of Plastic Surgery, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Belykh, T. Lei, S. Safavi-Abbasi et al., “Low-flow and high-flow neurosurgical bypass and anastomosis training models using human and bovine placental vessels: A histological analysis and validation study,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 915–928, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Aboud, O. Al-Mefty, and M. G. Yaşargil, “New laboratory model for neurosurgical training that simulates live surgery,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1367–1372, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. T. Tellioglu, E. Eker, K. Cimen, A. Comert, G. Karaeminogullari, and I. Tekdemir, “Training Model for Microvascular Anastomosis,” The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 238-239, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Alrasheed, J. Liu, M. M. Hanasono, C. E. Butler, and J. C. Selber, “Robotic microsurgery: Validating an assessment tool and plotting the learning curve,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 794–803, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Martin, G. Regehr, R. Reznick et al., “Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 273–278, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. D. Grober, S. J. Hamstra, R. K. Reznick, E. D. Matsumoto, R. S. Sidhu, and K. A. Jarvi, “Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity,” Microsurgery, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 317–322, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C.-A. E. Moulton, A. Dubrowski, H. MacRae, B. Graham, E. Grober, and R. Reznick, “Teaching surgical skills: What kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 400–407, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Y. Chan, N. Niranjan, and V. Ramakrishnan, “Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1329–1334, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. L. F. Temple and D. C. Ross, “A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: The University of Western Ontario microsurgical skills acquisition/assessment instrument,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 215–222, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Ghanem, A. E. Kim, M. Singh, and S. Myers, “Trauma'12 Winning Abstract - End Product Assessment in Microsurgery Simulation Training - A New Insider View,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 36, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Satterwhite, J. Son, J. Carey et al., “The stanford microsurgery and resident training (SMaRT) scale: Validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. S84–S88, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. G. Aoun, T. Y. El Ahmadieh, N. E. El Tecle et al., “A pilot study to assess the construct and face validity of the Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Harada, A. Morita, Y. Minakawa et al., “Assessing Microneurosurgical Skill with Medico-Engineering Technology,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 964–971, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. M. Ghanem, Y. Al Omran, B. Shatta, E. Kim, and S. Myers, “Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): A Validated End Product Assessment Tool for Simulation Microsurgery Training,” Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 233–241, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Belykh, E. J. Miller, T. Lei et al., “Face, Content, and Construct Validity of an Aneurysm Clipping Model Using Human Placenta,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 105, pp. 952–960, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. “The Battle of Ligatures,” in The Lancet, vol. 15, 889 pages, London, UK, 1877.
  25. Shumacker Jr. and B. Harris, “Authority, research and publication. Reflections based upon some historical aspects of vascular surgery,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. V. Eck, “On the question of ligature of the portal vein,” Voenno Med J, vol. 130, pp. 1-2, 1877. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Jassinowski, “Die Arteriennhat: Eine experimentelle Studie,” Inaug Diss Dorpat, 1889. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Carrel, “La technique operatoire des anastomoses vasculaires et la transplantation des visceres,” Lyon méd, vol. 98, no. 859, 1902. View at Google Scholar
  29. E. Hopfner, “Uber Gefassnhaht, Gefasstransplantationen und Replantation von amputierten Extremitaten,” Arch Klin Chir, vol. 70, pp. 417–471, 1903. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. F. Charles and D. A. Scott, “Studies on heparin I. The preparation of heparin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 425–429, 1933. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. McLean, “The discovery of heparin,” Circulation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. O. Nylean, “The microscope in aural surgery, its first use and later development,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 43, no. 116, pp. 226–240, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. V. A. Byvaltsev, “Operating microscope for vertebrologic and cranial operations: from monocular to 3-D imaging,” Sib. med. Zhurn, vol. 8, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  34. T. Kurze, “Microtechniques in Neurological Surgery,” Clinical neurosurgery, vol. 11, pp. 128–137, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. J. H. Jacobson and E. L. Suarez, “Microsurgery in anastomosis of small vessels,” Surgical forum, vol. 11, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. H. Jacobson, L. J. Wallman, G. A. Schumacher, M. Flanagan, E. L. Suarez, and R. M. Peardon Donaghy, “Microsurgery as an Aid to Middle Cerebral Artery Endarterectomy,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. D. G. Potts, “Aneurysms and arteriovenous anomalies of the brain: diagnosis and treatment,” Hoeber Medical Division: Harper & Row, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  38. R. M. Donaghy, “The history of microsurgery in neurosurgery,” Clinical Neurosurgery, vol. 26, pp. 619–625, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. M. Sundt Jr., J. P. Whisnant, D. G. Piepgras, J. K. Campbell, and C. B. Holman, “Intracranial bypass grafts for vertebral-basilar ischemia,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. F. Miller, R. F. Spetzler, and D. J. Kopaniky, “Middle meningeal to middle cerebral arterial bypass for cerebral revascularization. Case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 802–804, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. K. Reznick, “Teaching and testing technical skills,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 358–361, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. Matsumura, N. Hayashi, H. Kamiyama et al., “Microvascular anastomosis at 30-50 magnifications (super-microvascular anastomosis) in neurosurgery,” Surgical Neurology International, vol. 2, no. 1, article no. 6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. B. J. Kim, S. Kim, Y. Jeong, W. Lee, K. Lee, and S. Paeng, “An Efficient Microvascular Anastomosis Training Model Based on Chicken Wings and Simple Instruments,” Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Tehrani, J. McPhail, and K. Graham, “A simple training model for microvascular repair,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 6, article 1063, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Mutoh, T. Ishikawa, H. Ono, and N. Yasui, “A new polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel vascular model (KEZLEX) for microvascular anastomosis training,” Surgical Neurology International, vol. 1, no. 74, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. T. Ishikawa, N. Yasui, and H. Ono, “Novel brain model for training of deep microvascular anastomosis,” Neurologia medico-chirurgica, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 627–629, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Takeuchi, N. Hayashi, H. Hamada, N. Matsumura, H. Nishijo, and S. Endo, “A new training method to improve deep microsurgical skills using a mannequin head,” Microsurgery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 168–170, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. K. Byeong et al., “An efficient microvascular anastomosis training model based on chicken wings and simple instruments,” Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  49. H. Schoffl et al., “Strategies for the reduction of live animal use in microsurgical training and education,” ATLA-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 36, no. 2, article 153, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  50. P. A. S. Kadri, A. F. Krisht, and G. K. Gandhi, “An anatomic mathematical measurement to find an adequate recipient M4 branch for superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery,” Operative Neurosurgery, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. S-74–S-78, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. A. Abla, T. Uschold, M. C. Preul, and J. M. Zabramski, “Comparative use of turkey and chicken wing brachial artery models for microvascular anastomosis training: Laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1231–1235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. E. Colpan, K. V. Slavin, S. Amin-Hanjani, M. Calderon-Arnuphi, and F. T. Charbel, “Microvascular anastomosis training model based on a turkey neck with perfused arteries,” Operative Neurosurgery, vol. 62, 5, pp. ONS407–ONS411, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. K. G. Krishnan, P. Dramm, and G. Schackert, “Simple and viable in vitro perfusion model for training microvascular anastomoses,” Microsurgery, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 335–338, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Olabe, J. Olabe, and V. Sancho, “Human cadaver brain infusion model for neurosurgical training,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 700–702, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. Mathon, “Apprentissage des techniques microchirurgicales vasculaires sur un modèle animal,” Neurochirurgie, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 227–233, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. R. Sooppan, S. J. Paulsen, J. Han et al., “In vivo anastomosis and perfusion of a threedimensionally-printed construct containing microchannel networks,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. N. Lee, R. A. Daley, and B. C. Cooley, “Rat posterior facial vein interpositional graft: A more relevant training model,” Microsurgery, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 653–656, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. L. Liu, “Microvascular Anastomosis of Submillimeter Vessels—A Training Model in Rats,” Journal of Hand and Microsurgery, vol. 05, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. V. A. Byvaltsev, E. G. Belykh, and I. A. Stepanov, “The choice of the treatment method for cerebral aneurysms of different locations in the era of advanced endovascular technologies: A meta-analysis,” Vestnik Rossiĭskoĭ akademii meditsinskikh nauk, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. N. R. Lausada, E. Escudero, R. Lamonega, E. Dreizzen, and J. C. Raimondi, “Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training,” Microsurgery, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 500-501, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. C. Selber, E. I. Chang, J. Liu et al., “Tracking the Learning Curve in Microsurgical Skill Acquisition,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 550e–557e, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. A. Mehta and P. S. Li, “Male infertility microsurgical training,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. N. Jabbour and J. Sidman, “Assessing instrument handling and operative consequences simultaneously: A simple method for creating synced multicamera videos for endosurgical or microsurgical skills assessments,” Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 299–303, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. V. Datta, S. Mackay, M. Mandalia, and A. Darzi, “The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 479–485, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. I. Balasundaram, R. Aggarwal, and L. A. Darzi, “Development of a training curriculum for microsurgery,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 598–606, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. G. Knight et al., “Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 182–185, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  67. J. Lee, T. Mattar, T. Parisi, B. Carlsen, A. Bishop, and A. Shin, “Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Microvascular Anastomosis in the Rat,” Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, vol. 28, no. 07, pp. 451–456, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. R. A. Li, J. Jensen, and J. C. Bowersox, “Microvascular anastomoses performed in rats using a microsurgical telemanipulator,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 326–332, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  69. R. S. Haluck and T. M. Krummel, “Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century,” JAMA Surgery, vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 786–792, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. K. Montgomery et al., “Virtual reality in microsurgery training,” Medicine meets virtual reality, vol. 41, 1999. View at Google Scholar