Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mobile Information Systems
Volume 2016, Article ID 3091280, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3091280
Research Article

A Case of Engineering Quality for Mobile Healthcare Applications Using Augmented Personal Software Process Improvement

Faculty of Computer Sciences, Preston University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Received 9 January 2016; Accepted 21 February 2016

Academic Editor: Basit Shahzad

Copyright © 2016 Shahbaz Ahmed Khan Ghayyur et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Elson, J. G. Faughnan, and D. P. Connelly, “An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 266–278, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. C. Tang, M. P. Larosa, and S. M. Gorden, “Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. W. Bates, A. C. O'neil, D. Boyle et al., “Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 404–411, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. J. McDonald and W. M. Tierney, “Computer-stored medical records. Their future role in medical practice,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 259, no. 23, pp. 3433–3440, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. E. Garrett Jr., W. E. Hammond, and W. W. Stead, “The effects of computerized medical records on provider efficiency and quality of care,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 151–157, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Sunyaev, J. M. Leimeister, A. Schweiger, and H. Krcmar, “Integrationsarchitekturen fur das Krankenhaus—Status quo und Zukunftsperspektiven,” IM-MUNCHEN, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Kasbo and R. McLaughlin, Mobile Health Applications: 2012 Study, 2012.
  8. R. S. H. Istepanian, E. Jovanov, and Y. T. Zhang, “Introduction to the special section on m-Health: Beyond seamless mobility and global wireless health-care connectivity,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. R. Steinhubl, E. D. Muse, and E. J. Topol, “Can mobile health technologies transform health care?” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 310, no. 22, pp. 2395–2396, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. E. Kuziemsky, H. Monkman, C. Petersen et al., “Big data in healthcare-defining the digital persona through user contexts from the micro to the macro,” IMIA Yearbook, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 82–89, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Imouokhome and V. Osubor, “Mobile-device-based telemedicine for improved health-wealth,” African Journal of Computing & ICT, vol. 5, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. Ammenwerth, A. Buchauer, B. Bludau, and R. Haux, “Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 21–40, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Hyun, J. Choi, J. Chun et al., “Implementation of mobile computing system in clinical environment: MobileNurse,” in Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, p. 1036, 2000.
  14. R. Wootton, Telehealth in the Developing World, IDRC, 2009.
  15. M. Frappier and M. Richard, “SMP: a process-driven approach to project management,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 9, January 2004.
  16. S. B. de Oliveira, R. Valle, and C. F. Mahler, “A comparative analysis of CMMI software project management by Brazilian, Indian and Chinese companies,” Software Quality Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Umarji and C. Seaman, “Predicting acceptance of software process improvement,” ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Mens, J. Magee, and B. Rumpe, “Evolving software architecture descriptions of critical systems,” Computer, vol. 43, no. 5, Article ID 5472890, pp. 42–48, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Rozanski and E. Woods, Software Systems Architecture: Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA, 2011.
  20. A. Rauf, S. Anwar, M. Ramzan, and A. A. Shahid, “Analysis of softfare process improvement efforts in Pakistan,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE '10), pp. 375–379, Singapore, February 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Garlan and M. Shaw, “An introduction to software architecture,” in Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 1, World Scientific Publishing, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Barbacci Mario, “Quality attribute workshops (QAW),” Reporte Técnico del CMU-SEI, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Wojcik, F. Bachmann, L. Bass et al., “Attribute-Driven Design (ADD), Version 2.0,” DTIC Document, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Bourque and R. Dupuis, Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE Computer Society, EUA, 2004.
  25. S. Easterbrook and J. Aranda, “Case studies for software engineers,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '06), Shanghai, China, May 2006.
  26. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2013.
  27. R. Atkinson, “Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 337–342, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus