Research Article

Analysis of Small-Scale Fading Distributions in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications

Table 3

test fulfillment percentage for a confidence interval of 5% and best-fit distributions percentage.

Distributions Rayleigh Nakagami- Weibull Rice

Total measurements
5% 8.47 80.12 80.02 82.33 80.93
 Best-fit (%) 1.26 12.83 25.97 14.32 45.62

Route #1
5% 4.50 80.82 78.27 81.77 82.00
 Best-fit (%) 0.66 14.63 24.72 13.68 46.31

Route #2
5% 4.77 84.16 80.10 84.54 80.85
 Best-fit (%) 0.71 13.84 21.41 13.33 50.71

Route #3
5% 9.01 80.41 80.55 79.5 80.48
 Best-fit (%) 1.76 13.77 28.57 12.74 43.16

Route #4
5% 24.4 78.5 89.93 89.25 82.59
 Best-fit (%) 2.22 7.17 28.50 21.67 40.44

Route #5
5% 6.05 49.21 63.95 61.58 64.21
 Best-fit (%) 0.79 9.21 35.53 17.36 37.11

Route #6
5% 9.89 83.57 78.13 88.16 84.82
Best-fit (%) 1.67 11.14 23.96 15.32 47.91

Route #7
5% 19.83 77.89 86.15 89.46 84.71
 Best-fit (%) 1.65 8.88 31.40 18.40 39.67

Route #8
5% 15.72 72.49 82.53 81.66 81.22
 Best-fit (%) 3.06 6.11 29.26 17.03 44.54