Research Article
Distributed Hybrid Precoding for Indoor Deployments Using Millimeter Wave Band
Table 5
Comparison of average performance indicators with RZF.
| | CON RZF | DAS4 RZF | F4 RZF | DAS8 RZF | F8 RZF |
| Avg. user rate [Mbps] | 19.39 | 19.75 | 14.49 | 19.74 | 10.22 | Gain [%] | — | 1.86 | −25.29 | 1.78 | −47.28 | 5th percentile user rate [Mbps] | 0.58 | 2.70 | 1.66 | 4.10 | 1.39 | Gain [%] | — | 366.76 | 186.56 | 609.09 | 140.89 | Avg. site rate [Gbps] | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.72 | 0.99 | 0.51 | Gain [%] | — | 1.86 | −25.29 | 1.78 | −47.28 |
|
|
In this case, a site is assumed to be the group of cells located in half the scenario.
|