Research Article

An Improved Indoor Positioning Technique Based on Receiving Signal’s Strength

Table 1

Comparison of main indoor positioning technologies.

Positioning techniquePositioning methodPositioning accuracyAdvantagesDisadvantages

Visual imageImage processing, scene analysisHighLow environmental dependenceHigh cost and low stability

InfraredImage processing, proximity detectionHighMature technologyVisual distance transmission, interfered by light

UltrasoundMultilateral positioningHighHigh positioning accuracyGreatly affected by temperature and loss

BluetoothProximity detection, multilateral positioningMediumSmall size and low power consumptionShort transmission distance and low stability

WifiFingerprint positioning, multilateral positioningMediumLow cost and easy deploymentSusceptible to environmental interference

RFIDProximity detection, fingerprint positioningHighLow cost and small sizeShort distance and weak communication ability

UltrawidebandMultilateral positioningHighStrong penetrationHigh cost

GeomagneticFingerprint positioningMediumNot dependent on the environmentPoor stability

Cellular base stationProximity detectionLowWide coverageDepends on base station density

ZigBeeProximity detection, multilateral positioningHighLow cost and low power consumptionPoor stability and susceptible to interference

PseudoliteCarrier phase rangingHighWide coverageHigh cost

Inertial navigationDead reckoningMediumNot dependent on the external environmentCumulative error