Research Article
Teacher Allocation and Evaluation Based on Fuzzy C-Means Clustering
Table 1
Evaluation data of teacher allocation.
| Province | Percentage of bachelor degree or above | Proportion of senior titles | Student-teacher ratio |
| Beijing | 0.99 | 0.28 | 8.68 | Tianjin | 0.98 | 0.35 | 11.02 | Hebei | 0.90 | 0.18 | 13.72 | Shanxi | 0.85 | 0.12 | 10.27 | Inner Mongolia | 0.92 | 0.28 | 10.87 | Liaoning | 0.91 | 0.54 | 10.14 | Jilin | 0.92 | 0.27 | 9.27 | Heilongjiang | 0.88 | 0.27 | 9.96 | Shanghai | 0.99 | 0.12 | 10.47 | Jiangsu | 0.99 | 0.25 | 11.96 | Zhejiang | 0.97 | 0.25 | 12.29 | Anhui | 0.88 | 0.20 | 13.53 | Fujian | 0.90 | 0.21 | 13.46 | Jiangxi | 0.79 | 0.25 | 15.15 | Shandong | 0.91 | 0.15 | 12.24 | Henan | 0.83 | 0.17 | 13.87 | Hubei | 0.81 | 0.20 | 12.65 | Hunan | 0.83 | 0.15 | 13.33 | Guangdong | 0.92 | 0.14 | 13.47 | Guangxi | 0.84 | 0.15 | 14.83 | Hainan | 0.86 | 0.18 | 13.63 | Chongqing | 0.93 | 0.16 | 13.77 | Sichuan | 0.83 | 0.21 | 12.81 | Guizhou | 0.86 | 0.18 | 13.8 | Yunnan | 0.90 | 0.37 | 13.09 | Tibet | 0.92 | 0.11 | 11.55 | Shaanxi | 0.94 | 0.14 | 11.55 | Gansu | 0.87 | 0.18 | 10.76 | Qinghai | 0.86 | 0.25 | 13.34 | Ningxia | 0.94 | 0.23 | 14.15 | Xinjiang | 0.84 | 0.17 | 11.61 |
|
|