Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 507815 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/507815

Jiangbo Zhou, Lixin Tian, "Periodic and Solitary Wave Solutions to the Fornberg-Whitham Equation", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2009, Article ID 507815, 10 pages, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/507815

# Periodic and Solitary Wave Solutions to the Fornberg-Whitham Equation

Academic Editor: Katica R. (Stevanovic) Hedrih
Received27 Nov 2008
Revised04 Feb 2009
Accepted06 Mar 2009
Published02 Jun 2009

#### Abstract

New travelling wave solutions to the Fornberg-Whitham equation are investigated. They are characterized by two parameters. The expresssions for the periodic and solitary wave solutions are obtained.

#### 1. Introduction

Recently, Ivanov  investigated the integrability of a class of nonlinear dispersive wave equations: where and are real constants.

The important cases of (1.1) are as follows. The hyperelastic-rod wave equation has been recently studied as a model, describing nonlinear dispersive waves in cylindrical compressible hyperelastic rods . The physical parameters of various compressible materials put in the range from –29.4760 to 3.4174 [2, 4].

The Camassa-Holm equation describes the unidirectional propagation of shallow water waves over a flat bottom [8, 9]. It is completely integrable  and admits, in addition to smooth waves, a multitude of travelling wave solutions with singularities: peakons, cuspons, stumpons, and composite waves . The solitary waves of (1.2) are smooth if and peaked if [9, 10]. Its solitary waves are stable solitons [13, 14], retaining their shape and form after interactions . It models wave breaking .

The Degasperis-Procesi equation models nonlinear shallow water dynamics. It is completely integrable  and has a variety of travelling wave solutions including solitary wave solutions, peakon solutions and shock waves solutions .

The Fornberg-Whitham equation appeared in the study qualitative behaviors of wave-breaking . It admits a wave of greatest height, as a peaked limiting form of the travelling wave solution , , where is an arbitrary constant. It is not completely integrable .

The regularized long-wave or BBM equation and the modified BBM equation have also been investigated by many authors .

Many efforts have been devoted to study (1.2)–(1.4), (1.6), and (1.7), however, little attention was paid to study (1.5). In , we constructed two types of bounded travelling wave solutions to (1.5), which are defined on semifinal bounded domains and called kink-like and antikink-like wave solutions. In this paper, we continue to study the travelling wave solutions to (1.5). Following Vakhnenko and Parkes's strategy in , we obtain some periodic and solitary wave solutions to (1.5) which are defined on . The travelling wave solutions obtained in this paper are obviously different from those obtained in our previous work . To the best of our knowledge, these solutions are new for (1.5). Our work may help people to know deeply the described physical process and possible applications of the Fornberg-Whitham equation.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, for completeness and readability, we repeat Appendix A in , which discusses the solutions to a first-order ordinary differential equaion. In Section 3, we show that, for travelling wave solutions, (1.5) may be reduced to a first-order ordinary differential equation involving two arbitrary integration constants and . We show that there are four distinct periodic solutions corresponding to four different ranges of values of and restricted ranges of values of . A short conclusion is given in Section 4.

#### 2. Solutions to a First-Order Ordinary Differential Equaion

This section is due to Vakhnenko and Parkes (see Appendix A in ). For completeness and readability, we repeat it in the following.

Consider solutions to the following ordinary differential equation where and , , , are chosen to be real constants with .

Following  we introduce defined by so that (2.1) becomes

Equation(2.4) has two possible forms of solution. The first form is found using result 254.00 in . Its parametric form is with as the parameter, where In (2.5) is a Jacobian elliptic function, where the notation is as used in [42, Chapter 16], and the notation is as used in [42, Section 17.2.15].

The solution to (2.1) is given in parametric form by (2.5) with as the parameter. With respect to , in (2.5) is periodic with period , where is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. It follows from (2.5) that the wavelength of the solution to (2.1) is where is the complete elliptic integral of the third kind.

When , , (2.5) becomes

The second form of solution of (2.5) is found using result 255.00 in . Its parametric form is where are as in (2.6), and

The solution to (2.1) is given in parametric form by (2.10) with as the parameter. The wavelength of the solution to (2.1) is

When , , (2.10) becomes

#### 3. Periodic and Solitary Wave Solutions to Equaion (1.5)

Equation (1.5) can also be written in the form Let with be a travelling wave solution to (3.1), then it follows that Integrating (3.2) twice with respect to , we have where and are two arbitrary integration constants.

Equation (3.3) is in the form of (2.1) with and . For convenience we define and by and define , , , and by Obviously, , are the roots of .

In the following, suppose that and such that has three distinct stationary points: , , and comprise two minimums separated by a maximum. Under this assumption, (3.3) has periodic and solitary wave solutions that have different analytical forms depending on the values of and as follows.

(1)

In this case and . For each value and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(a)), there are periodic inverted loop-like solutions to (3.3) given by (2.5) so that , and with wavelength given by (2.8); see Figure 2(a), for an example.

The case and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(b)) corresponds to the limit so that , and then the solution is an inverted loop-like solitary wave given by (2.9) with and see Figure 3(a), for an example.

(2)

In this case and . For each value and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(c)), there are periodic hump-like solutions to (3.3) given by (2.5) so that , and with wavelength given by (2.8); see Figure 2(b), for an example.

The case and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(d)) corresponds to the limit so that , and then the solution can be given by (2.9) with and given by the roots of , namely In this case we obtain a weak solution, namely, the periodic upward-cusp wave where see Figure 3(b), for an example.

(3)

In this case and . For and each value (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(e)), there are periodic hump-like solutions to (3.3) given by (2.10) so that , and with wavelength given by (2.12); see Figure 2(c), for an example.

The case and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(f)) corresponds to the limit and so that . In this case neither (2.9) nor (2.13) is appropriate. Instead we consider (3.3) with and note that the bound solution has . On integrating (3.3) and setting at we obtain a weak solution that is, a single peakon solution with amplitude , see Figure 3(c).

(4)

In this case and . For each value and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(g)), there are periodic hump-like solutions to (3.3) given by (2.10) so that , and with wavelength given by (2.12); see Figure 2(d), for an example.

The case and (a corresponding curve of is shown in Figure 1(h)) corresponds to the limit so that , and then the solution is a hump-like solitary wave given by (2.13) with and see Figure 3(d), for an example.

On the above, we have obtained expressions of parametric form for periodic and solitary wave solutions to (3.3). So in terms of , we can get expressions for the periodic and solitary wave solutions to (1.5).

#### 4. Conclusion

In this paper, we have found expressions for new travelling wave solutions to the Fornberg-Whitham equation. These solutions depend, in effect, on two parameters and . For , there are inverted loop-like (), single peaked (), and hump-like () solitary wave solutions. For or , and , there are periodic hump-like wave solutions.

#### Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful to an anonymous referee for the important comments and suggestions. Zhou acknowledges funding from Startup Fund for Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University (No. 09JDG013). Tian's work was partially supported by NSF of China (No. 90610031).

1. R. Ivanov, “On the integrability of a class of nonlinear dispersive wave equations,” Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 462–468, 2005.
2. H.-H. Dai, “Model equations for nonlinear dispersive waves in a compressible Mooney-Rivlin rod,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 127, no. 1–4, pp. 193–207, 1998.
3. A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss, “Stability of a class of solitary waves in compressible elastic rods,” Physics Letters A, vol. 270, no. 3-4, pp. 140–148, 2000.
4. H.-H. Dai and Y. Huo, “Solitary shock waves and other travelling waves in a general compressible hyperelastic rod,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 456, no. 1994, pp. 331–363, 2000.
5. Z. Yin, “On the Cauchy problem for a nonlinearly dispersive wave equation,” Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2003.
6. Y. Zhou, “Stability of solitary waves for a rod equation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 977–981, 2004.
7. Y. Zhou, “Blow-up of solutions to a nonlinear dispersive rod equation,” Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
8. R. S. Johnson, “Camassa-Holm, Korteweg-de Vries and related models for water waves,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 455, pp. 63–82, 2002.
9. R. Camassa and D. D. Holm, “An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1661–1664, 1993.
10. Y. A. Li, P. J. Olver, and P. Rosenau, “Non-analytic solutions of nonlinear wave models,” in Nonlinear Theory of Generalized Functions, vol. 401 of Chapman & Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics, pp. 129–145, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1999.
11. J. Lenells, “Traveling wave solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 393–430, 2005.
12. Y. A. Li and P. J. Olver, “Well-posedness and blow-up solutions for an integrable nonlinearly dispersive model wave equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 27–63, 2000.
13. A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss, “Stability of the Camassa-Holm solitons,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 415–422, 2002.
14. A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss, “Stability of peakons,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 603–610, 2000.
15. R. S. Johnson, “On solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 459, no. 2035, pp. 1687–1708, 2003.
16. A. Constantin, “Existence of permanent and breaking waves for a shallow water equation: a geometric approach,” Annales de l'Institut Fourier, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 321–362, 2000.
17. A. Constantin and J. Escher, “Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlocal shallow water equations,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 229–243, 1998.
18. A. Constantin and J. Escher, “On the blow-up rate and the blow-up set of breaking waves for a shallow water equation,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 75–91, 2000.
19. H. Lundmark, “Formation and dynamics of shock waves in the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 169–198, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
20. J. Escher, Y. Liu, and Z. Yin, “Shock waves and blow-up phenomena for the periodic Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Indiana University Mathematics Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 87–118, 2007.
21. G. M. Coclite, K. H. Karlsen, and N. H. Risebro, “Numerical schemes for computing discontinuous solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 80–105, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
22. G. M. Coclite and K. H. Karlsen, “On the uniqueness of discontinuous solutions to the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 142–160, 2007.
23. J. Lenells, “Traveling wave solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 306, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2005.
24. Y. Matsuno, “Multisoliton solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation and their peakon limit,” Inverse Problems, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1553–1570, 2005.
25. H. Lundmark and J. Szmigielski, “Multi-peakon solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Inverse Problem, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1241–1245, 2003.
26. Y. Matsuno, “Cusp and loop soliton solutions of short-wave models for the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 359, no. 5, pp. 451–457, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
27. G. B. Whitham, “Variational methods and applications to water wave,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 299, no. 1456, pp. 6–25, 1967. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
28. B. Fornberg and G. B. Whitham, “A numerical and theoretical study of certain nonlinear wave phenomena,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, vol. 289, no. 1361, pp. 373–404, 1978.
29. A. C. Bryan and A. E. G. Stuart, “Solitons and the regularized long wave equation: a nonexistence theorem,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1881–1886, 1996.
30. D. Bhardwaj and R. Shankar, “A computational method for regularized long wave equation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1397–1404, 2000.
31. S. I. Zaki, “Solitary waves of the splitted RLW equation,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
32. J. I. Ramos, “Solitary waves of the EW and RLW equations,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1498–1518, 2007.
33. J. I. Ramos, “Solitary wave interactions of the GRLW equation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 479–491, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
34. J. Nickel, “Elliptic solutions to a generalized BBM equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 364, no. 3-4, pp. 221–226, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
35. A. H. A. Ali, A. A. Soliman, and K. R. Raslan, “Soliton solution for nonlinear partial differential equations by cosine-function method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 368, no. 3-4, pp. 299–304, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
36. D. Feng, J. Li, J. Lü, and T. He, “New explicit and exact solutions for a system of variant RLW equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 715–720, 2008.
37. Z. Lin, “Instability of nonlinear dispersive solitary waves,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 255, no. 5, pp. 1191–1224, 2008.
38. J. Zhou and L. Tian, “A type of bounded traveling wave solutions for the Fornberg-Whitham equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 346, no. 1, pp. 255–261, 2008.
39. V. O. Vakhnenko and E. J. Parkes, “Periodic and solitary-wave solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1059–1073, 2004.
40. E. J. Parkes, “The stability of solutions of Vakhnenko's equation,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 6469–6475, 1993.
41. P. F. Byrd and M. D. Friedman, Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 67, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1971. View at: Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
42. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1972. View at: Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet