Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2009, Article ID 740460, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/740460
Research Article

Nonsphericity of the Moon and Near Sun-Synchronous Polar Lunar Orbits

1UNESP—Universidade Estadual Paulista, CEP 12516-410, Guaratinguetá-SP, Brazil
2Division of Space Mechanics and Control—INPE, CEP 12227-010, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Received 30 July 2009; Revised 28 October 2009; Accepted 3 December 2009

Academic Editor: Tadashi Yokoyama

Copyright © 2009 Jean Paulo dos Santos Carvalho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. I. Hori, “Theory of general perturbations with unspecified canonical variables,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 287–296, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  2. S.-Y. Park and J. L. Junkins, “Orbital mission analysis for a lunar mapping satellite,” Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 207–217, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. De Saedeleer and J. Henrard, “Orbit of a lunar artificial satellite: analytical theory of perturbations,” in Transits of Venus: New Views of the Solar System and Galaxy, IAU Colloquium, no. 196, pp. 254–262, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. B. De Saedeleer, “Analytical theory of a lunar artificial satellite with third body perturbations,” Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 95, no. 1–4, pp. 407–423, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. B. De Saedeleer and J. Henrard, “The combined effect of J2 and C22 on the critical inclination of a lunar orbiter,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Deprit, “Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 12–30, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. Ferraz Mello, Canonical Perturbation Theories, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  8. J. P. dos Santos Carvalho, R. V. de Moraes, and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Semi-analytic theory of a moon artificial satellite considering lunar oblateness and perturbations due to a third-body in elliptic orbit,” in Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Conference on Dynamics, Control and Applications, pp. 51–57, Presidente Prudente, Brazil, 2008.
  9. J. P. dos Santos Carvalho, R. V. de Moraes, and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Moon artificial satellites: lunar oblateness and earth perturbations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Aerospace and Sciences (ICNPAA '08), pp. 1095–1106, Cambrige Scientific, Genoa, Italy, 2009.
  10. J. P. dos Santos Carvalho, R. V. de Moraes, and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “A study on resonance for a lunar artificial satellite,” in Proceedings of the 8th Brazilian Conference on Dynamics, Control and Applications, pp. 1–6, Bauru, Brazil, 2009.
  11. J. P. dos Santos Carvalho, R. V. de Moraes, and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Non-sphericity of the moon and critical inclination,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Congresso Nacional de Matemática Aplicada e Computacional, Cuiabá, Brazil, 2009.
  12. W. M. Kaula, Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  13. M. Radwan, “Analytical approach to the motion of a lunar artificial satellite,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 283, no. 2, pp. 133–150, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. G. E. O. Giacaglia, J. P. Murphy, and T. L. Felsentreger, “A semi-analytic theory for the motion of a lunar satellite,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–66, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. A. Elipe and M. Lara, “Frozen orbits about the moon,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Knežević and A. Milani, “Orbit maintenance of a lunar polar orbiter,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 46, no. 11-12, pp. 1605–1611, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Cayley, “Tables of the developments of functions in the theory of elliptic motion,” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomicai Society, vol. 29, p. 191, 1861. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. A. Broucke, “Long-term third-body effects via double averaging,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. V. Costa and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Orbital Evolution of a Satellite Perturbed by a Third Body,” in Advances in Space Dynamics, A. F. Bertachini and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, Eds., p. 176, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. R. C. Domingos, R. V. de Moraes, and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Third-body perturbation in the case of elliptic orbits for the disturbing body,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 129, part 3, pp. 2639–2652, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Third-body perturbation in orbits around natural satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. R. H. Solórzano, Third-body perturbation using a single averaged model, M.S. dissertation, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil, 2002.
  23. C. R. H. Solórzano and A. F. B. de Almeida Prado, “Third-body perturbation using a single averaged model,” in Advances in Space Dynamics 4: Celestial Mechanics and Astronautics, H. K. Kuga, Ed., pp. 47–56, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Da Silva Fernandes, “Notes on Hori method for canonical systems,” Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. S. Breiter, “Second-order solution for the zonal problem of satellite theory,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 67, pp. 237–249, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. J. Kovalevsky, Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, Bureau dês Longitudes, Paris, France, 1967.
  27. D. Brouwer, “Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 64, pp. 378–397, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. W. K. Meyer, J. J. Buglia, and P. N. Desai, “Lifetimes of Lunar Satellite Orbits,” Tech. Rep. N-TP-3394 94, p. 27771, NASA STI/Recon, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. D'Avanzo, P. Teofilatto, and C. Ulivieri, “Long-term effects on lunar orbiter,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Akim and A. Golikov, “Combined model of the lunar gravity field,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ESOC '97), pp. 357–360, Darmstadt, Germany, June 1997.