Research Article
Effect of Construction Method on Shear Lag in Prestressed Concrete Box Girders
Table 1
Comparison of shear lag coefficients of the continuous beams under self-weight.
| State | Construction type | Figure | Step | Shear lag coefficient on cross-sections | | | | |
| Before being continuous | PSSM | Figure 4 | S1 | 1.0245 | 1.0183 | 1.0245 | | CM (simplified model) | Figure 8 | S1 | 0.8528 | 0.9749 | 0.9902 | 1.1409 | CM | Figure 7 | S9 | 0.8951 | 0.9822 | 0.9930 | 1.1413 |
| After being continuous | SM | Figure 1 | S1 | 1.0362 | 1.0362 | | 1.3218 | PSSM | Figure 4 | S2 | 1.0243 | 1.0183 | 1.0245 | 2.3815 | CM (simplified model) | Figure 8 | S2 | 0.8333 | 0.9747 | 0.9902 | 1.1419 | CM | Figure 7 | S10 | 0.8812 | 0.9820 | 0.9931 | 1.1420 |
| 3 years late after being continuous | SM | Figure 1 | S1 | 1.0362 | 1.0362 | | 1.3218 | PSSM | Figure 4 | S3 | 1.0299 | 1.0255 | 1.0573 | 1.1019 | CM (simplified model) | Figure 8 | S3 | 1.0749 | −0.0143 | 0.9770 | 1.1927 | CM | Figure 7 | S11 | 1.0556 | 0.6493 | 0.9842 | 1.1906 |
|
|