Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2012, Article ID 530561, 21 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/530561
Research Article

Guidance Compliance Behavior on VMS Based on SOAR Cognitive Architecture

1College of Management and Economic, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2Transportation Planning Center, Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Tianjin 300051, China
3School of Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China

Received 13 July 2012; Accepted 18 September 2012

Academic Editor: Baozhen Yao

Copyright © 2012 Shiquan Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. He, ITS System Engineering Introduction, Chinese Railway Press, Beijing, China, 2004.
  2. H. Huang, “Dynamic modeling of urban transportation networks and analysis of its travel behaviors,” Chinese Journal of Management, vol. 2, pp. 18–22, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Wardman, P. W. Bonsall, and J. D. Shires, “Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation,” Transportation Research C, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 389–405, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Thakuriah and A. Sen, “Quality of information given by advanced traveler information systems,” Transportation Research C, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 249–266, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Wang, M. Papageorgiou, G. Sarros, and W. J. Knibbe, “Real-time route guidance for large-scale express ring-roads,” in Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC '06), pp. 224–229, September 2006. View at Scopus
  6. F. P. Deflorio, “Evaluation of a reactive dynamic route guidance strategy,” Transportation Research C, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 375–388, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Yin and H. Yang, “Simultaneous determination of the equilibrium market penetration and compliance rate of advanced traveler information systems,” Transportation Research A, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 165–181, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. S. Mahmassani and Y. H. Liu, “Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveler information systems,” Transportation Research C, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 91–107, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. C. Jou, S. H. Lam, Y. H. Liu, and K. H. Chen, “Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information,” Transportation Research A, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 445–461, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Bekhor and J. N. Prashker, “GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives,” Transportation Research B, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 243–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. F. Daganzo and Y. Sheffi, “On stochastic models of traffic assignment,” Transportation Science, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 253–274, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Watling, “User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 1539–1556, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. W. Bonsall and M. Joint, “Driver compliance with route guidance advice. The evidence and its implications,” in Proceedings of the Vehicle Navigation & Information Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 47–59, October 1991. View at Scopus
  14. M. Cummings, “Electronic signs strategies and their benefits,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, pp. 141–144, London, UK, 1994.
  15. S. Tarry and A. Graham, “The role of evaluation in ATT development. IV: evaluation of ATT systems,” Traffic Engineering and Control, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 688–693, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Swann, I. W. Routeledge, J. Parker, and S. Tarry, “Result of practical applications of variable message signs(VMS):A64/AI accideng reduction scheme and Forth Estuary Driver Information and Control System(FEDICS),” in Proceedings of the Seminar G Held at the 23rd PTRC European Transport Forum, pp. 149–167, 1995.
  17. A. Erke, F. Sagberg, and R. Hagman, “Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour,” Transportation Research F, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 447–457, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. N. Koutsopoulos and H. Xu, “An information discounting routing strategy for advanced traveler information systems,” Transportation Research C, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 249–264, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Ozbay and B. Bartin, “Estimation of economic impact of VMS route guidance using microsimulation,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 8, pp. 215–241, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. L. Adler, “Investigating the learning effects of route guidance and traffic advisories on route choice behavior,” Transportation Research C, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Zhou and J. Wu, “The research on drivers’ route choice behavior in the presence of dynamic traffic information,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, pp. 17–20, 2006.
  22. J. Chen, P. Liu, and W. Wang, “Methods for en route parking guidance and information system survey in Nanjing,” Urban Transport of China, vol. 4, pp. 79–83, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Mo and K. Yan, “Analysis of the performance of the PGIS in metropolitan area,” Road Traffic and Safety, vol. 5, pp. 33–36, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. W. Allen, A. C. Stein, T. J. Rosenthal, D. Ziedman, J. F. Torres, and A. Halati, “Human factors simulation investigation of driver route diversion and alternate route selection using in-vehicle navigation systems,” in Proceedings of the Vehicle Navigation & Information Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 9–26, October 1991. View at Scopus
  25. R. Srinivasan and P. P. Jovanis, “Evaluation of the attentional demand of selected visual route guidance systems,” in Proceedings of the 6th 1995 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, pp. 140–146, August 1995. View at Scopus
  26. W. Chen and P. J. Paul, “Analysis of a driver en-route guidance compliance and driver learning with ATIS using a travel simulation experiment,” Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-12, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Calif, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Wachinger and D. Boehm-Davis, “Navigational preference and driver acceptance of advanced traveler information systems,” in Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Devices, Y. Noy, Ed., pp. 345–362, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  28. C. Lu and Y. Tan, “The simulation and analysis of urban transportation system complexity,” System Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 84–87, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. H. J. Huang, T. L. Liu, and H. Yang, “Modeling the evolutions of day-to-day route choice and year-to-year ATIS adoption with stochastic user equilibrium,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. L. Adler and V. J. Blue, “A cooperative multi-agent transportation management and route guidance system,” Transportation Research C, vol. 10, no. 5-6, pp. 433–454, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Wahle, A. L. C. Bazzan, F. Klűgl, and M. Schreckenberg, Anticipatory Traffic Forecast Using Multi-Agent Techniques, Traffic and Granular Flow, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
  32. H. Dia, “A conceptual framework for modeling dynamic driver behavior using intelligent agents,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering, pp. 28–30, Singapore, 2000.
  33. S. Nason and J. E. Laird, “Soar-RL: Integrating reinforcement learning with SOAR,” Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. M. Jones, J. E. Laird, and P. E. Nielsen, “Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation,” in Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI '98), pp. 1047–1054, July 1998. View at Scopus
  35. R. P. Marinier, J. E. Laird, and R. L. Lewis, “A computational unification of cognitive behavior and emotion,” Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48–69, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. E. Laird, A. Newell, and P. S. Rosenbloom, “SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 1–64, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  37. P. S. Rosenbloom, J. E. Laird, and A. Newell, “Knowledge-level learning in Soar,” in Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAT '87), pp. 499–504, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif, USA, 1987.
  38. A. Nuxoll and J. Laird, “A cognitive model of episodic memory integrated with a general cognitive architecture,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 2004.