A New Model for the Regulation Width of Waterway Based on Hydraulic Geometry Relation

Table 3

The parameter value of each river.

No.	River	Source	V (m/s)	B (m)	H (m)	J (%)	𝐷50 (mm)	Amount
1	Niobrara River	Colby and Hembree [26] (1954)	0.90	21.39	0.47	1.43	0.29	40
2	Punjab canal	Simons [27] (1957)	0.62	17.08	1.40	0.218	0.28	42
3	Yangtze River	Wuhan Hydropower College [28] (1959)	1.23	1135.68	9.93	1.7	0.36	290
4	Rio Grande River	Nordin and Beverage [29] (1965)	0.89	58.35	0.65	1.18	0.45	138
5	Mississippi River	Toffaleti [30] (1968)	1.14	659.09	9.47	0.059	0.36	77
6	Middle Loup River	Hubbell and Matejka [31] (1959)	0.75	44.44	0.33	1.31	0.35	30
7	Australia rivers	Schumm [32] (1968)	3.3	220	21	0.17	0.37	98
8	N. saskatchewan and Elbow River	Samide [33] (1971)	2.33	4.94	1.64	3.82	31.81	40
9	Missouri River	Shen et al. [34] (1978)	1.55	211.30	3.40	0.148	0.12	25
10	New zealand rivers	Griffiths [35] (1981)	1.52	42.93	1.50	2.57	52.35	60
11	United Kingdom rivers	Hey and Thorne [36] (1986)	1.95	24.74	1.42	4.75	62.61	45
12	Northern Ireland rivers	Higginson and Johnston [37] (1988)	1.70	19.19	1.54	3.42	43.83	49
13	Italy rivers	Colosimo et al. [38] (2005)	1.45	9.36	0.39	1.0	36.93	56
14	Yellow River	Yang [39] (1988)	1.76	559.06	2.12	0.22	0.09	410