A Resilience Approach to Symbiosis Networks of Ecoindustrial Parks Based on Cascading Failure Model

Table 1

The cascading failure process and node weight ranking of the top 5 places.

Node number	Cascading failure process	𝑅	𝐼	Ranking	Weight
29	{27, 75} → {28, 30–32} → {35, 43} → {48–50, 59, 62–65} → {1, 5, 6, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39–41, 46, 51, 58} → {7–9, 42, 44, 45, 47, 61, 66–69} → {2, 4, 15–17, 56, 57, 74} → {38}	0.6800	1	1	0.0843
30	{27, 75} → {28, 29, 31, 32} → {35, 43, 48–50, 59, 62–65} → {1, 5, 6, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 46, 51, 58} → {7–9, 42, 44, 45, 47, 61, 66–69} → {2, 4, 15–17, 56, 57, 74} → {38}	0.6800	0.9976	2	0.0841
4	{2, 45} → {38, 44} → {32–34, 46, 48, 75} → {35, 36, 43, 47, 49, 50, 59, 62–65} → {1, 5, 6, 31, 37, 39, 40, 41, 51, 58, 74} → {7, 8, 9, 27, 42, 61} → {15–17, 28–30, 57}	0.6133	0.9551	3	0.0805
47	{46, 74} → {31, 75} → {36, 43} → {1, 32–34, 44, 45, 59} → {2, 4, 27, 35, 39, 48–50, 62–65} → {5, 6, 28–30, 37, 38, 40, 41, 51, 58} → {42, 61} → {57}	0.5333	0.9396	4	0.0786
69	{33, 56, 75} → {66, 67, 68} → {56}	0.1067	0.6573	5	0.0554