Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 376375, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/376375
Research Article

Using the Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation Approach for Assessing the Importance of Risk Factors in a Software Development Project

1Graduate Institute of Project Management, Kainan University, No. 1, Kainan Road, Taoyuan, Luzhu Shiang 33857, Taiwan
2Department of Business Administration, National Central University, No. 300, Jhongda Road, Taoyuan, Jhongli City 32001, Taiwan

Received 15 January 2013; Accepted 28 April 2013

Academic Editor: Ker-Wei Yu

Copyright © 2013 Shih-Tong Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. M. Lee, “Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 323–336, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. H. Kwak and J. Stoddard, “Project risk management: lessons learned from software development environment,” Technovation, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 915–920, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. de Oliveira Barros, C. M. L. Werner, and G. H. Travassos, “Supporting risks in software project management,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 70, no. 1-2, pp. 21–35, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. T. Lu and S. H. Yu, “Risk factors assessment for software development project based on fuzzy decision making,” International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 596–600, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. T.-C. Wang and Y.-H. Chen, “Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 19, pp. 3755–3765, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, and M. Luque, “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. B. W. Boehm, “Software risk management: principles and practices,” IEEE Software, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. M. Lee and L. Lin, “Fuzzy risk presumptive evaluation in software development,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 3881–3889, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Jiang and G. Klein, “Software development risks to project effectiveness,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. X. Houston, G. T. Mackulak, and J. S. Collofello, “Stochastic simulation of risk factor potential effects for software development risk management,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 247–257, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Büyüközkan and D. Ruan, “Choquet integral based aggregation approach to software development risk assessment,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 441–451, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. N. Lu and Q. G. Ma, “Risk analysis in software development project with owners and contractors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference: Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development (IEMC '04), vol. 2, pp. 789–793, October 2004. View at Scopus
  13. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  14. J. J. Buckley, “Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. S.-J. Chen and C.-L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Method and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The Logic of Priorities, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 1982.
  17. T. Y. Hsieh, S. T. Lu, and G. H. Tzeng, “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 573–584, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. T. Lu, “Using the fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach for risk evaluation on investment of overseas project,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC '10), vol. 4, pp. 2031–2036, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus