Impact of Transit Network Layout on Resident Mode Choice

Table 4

BP forecasting results

BP Forecasting Results of Training Set							BP Forecasting Results of Testing Set
(Individual_Travel)							(Individual_Travel)
	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode		M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode
M1	71	19	2	7	1	71%	M1	22	2	4	0	2	73%
M2	2	72	0	8	18	72%	M2	2	19	0	4	5	63%
M3	2	0	93	2	3	93%	M3	0	0	28	2	0	93%
M4	7	1	12	77	3	77%	M4	8	0	2	20	0	67%
M5	0	0	1	4	95	95%	M5	0	0	0	5	25	83%
Average of hit Rate: 82%							Average of hit Rate: 76%
BP Forecasting Results of Training Set							BP Forecasting Results of Testing Set
(Individual_Travel_NetZone)							(Individual_Travel_NetZone)
	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode		M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode
M1	85	6	2	3	4	85%	M1	24	0	4	0	2	80%
M2	3	82	4	0	11	82%	M2	2	25	1	0	2	83%
M3	4	3	92	1	0	92%	M3	0	1	28	1	0	93%
M4	3	0	3	91	3	91%	M4	0	0	0	29	1	97%
M5	0	0	4	4	92	92%	M5	0	0	0	5	25	83%
Average of hit Rate: 88%							Average of hit Rate: 87%
BP Forecasting Results of Training Set							BP Forecasting Results of Testing Set
(Individual_Travel_NetIndividual)							(Individual_Travel_NetIndividual)
	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode		M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	Hit rate of; each mode
M1	75	15	8	2	0	75%	M1	24	0	4	0	2	80%
M2	6	77	1	0	16	77%	M2	5	21	0	0	4	70%
M3	2	0	87	7	4	87%	M3	0	1	29	0	0	97%
M4	6	0	6	84	4	84%	M4	3	0	0	27	0	90%
M5	0	0	0	6	94	94%	M5	0	0	0	8	22	73%
Average of hit Rate: 83%							Average of hit Rate: 82%