Torsional Vibrations of a Conic Shaft with Opposite Tapers Carrying Arbitrary Concentrated Elements
Table 2
Influence of taper ratio () on the lowest five natural frequencies (rad/sec) of the P-taper conic shaft (cf. Figure 5) with larger-end diameter m and shaft length m kept unchanged: (a) F-F, (b) C-C, (c) C-F, and (d) F-C BCs.
(a)
Case
Taper ratios
Method
Natural frequencies, (rad/sec)
1
0.02
Exact#
7384.4129
11854.5424
16427.4469
21133.5082
25931.2855
FEM*
7382.5338
11854.2819
16438.2035
21170.1886
26013.7379
2
0.01
Exact
5374.8958
10198.6873
15134.0131
20100.9780
25081.0046
FEM
5375.3828
10204.5966
15155.2176
20152.2975
25182.2201
3
0.005
Exact
5074.8956
10037.9356
15025.4133
20019.1472
25015.3982
FEM
5075.6554
10044.3910
15047.4403
20071.5715
25118.0086
4
0.0025
Exact
5016.8720
10008.5200
15005.7524
20004.3882
25003.5861
FEM
5017.6806
10015.0732
15027.9268
20057.0107
25106.4467
5
0.001
Exact
5002.5736
10001.3500
15000.9698
20000.8006
25000.7158
FEM
5003.3940
10007.9269
15023.1800
20053.4711
25103.6372
Uniform shaft**
5000.0416
10000.0832
15000.1248
20000.1664
25000.2080
Natural frequencies obtained from presented exact method using single shaft segment (). Natural frequencies obtained from finite element method using 50 shaft elements (). The exact natural frequencies of uniform shaft obtained from formulas in the appendix.