- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 623757, 6 pages
A New Distance Measure and Ranking Method for Generalized Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers
1Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Mathematics, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
Received 28 January 2013; Accepted 13 April 2013
Academic Editor: Gozde Ulutagay
Copyright © 2013 T. Allahviranloo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This study presents an approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on the centroid point of a fuzzy number and its area. The total approximate is determined by convex combining of fuzzy number’s relative and its area that is based on decision maker’s optimistic perspectives. The proposed approach is simple in terms of computational efforts and is efficient in ranking a large quantity of fuzzy numbers. A group of examples by Bortolan and Degani (1985) demonstrate the accuracy and applicability of the proposed approach. Finally by this approach, a new measure is introduced between two fuzzy numbers.
The fuzzy set theory pioneered by Zadeh  has been extensively used. Fuzzy numbers or fuzzy subsets of the real line are applied to represent the imprecise numerical measurements of different alternatives. Therefore, comparing the different alternatives is actually comparing the resulting fuzzy numbers.
Also in many applications of fuzzy set theory to decision making, we need to know the best select from a collection of possible solutions. This selection process may require that we rank or order fuzzy numbers.
Several researchers presented ranking methods [2–7]. Various techniques are applied to compare the fuzzy numbers. Some of the exiting approaches are difficult to understand and have suffered from different plights, for example, the lack of discrimination, producing counterintuitive orderings, and ultimately resulting in inconsistent ordering if a new fuzzy number is added. Also nearly all approaches should acquire membership functions of fuzzy numbers before the ranking is performed; however, this may be infeasible in real applications. Furthermore, accuracy and efficiency should be of priority concern in the ranking process if ranking a large amount of fuzzy numbers. In light of the above discussion, specially in , Chen and Lu have proposed an approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers, in that they worked with dominance.
Also we studied here the approach is determined by convex combining the centroid point of and area of a fuzzy number that performs simple arithmetic operations for the ranking purpose, and it can be applied to rank the combination case of some fuzzy numbers and crisp numbers and the case of discrete fuzzy numbers and it is useful in ranking a large quantity of fuzzy numbers. Comparing the proposed approximate approach with the existing methods using both Bortolan and Degani’s examples .
The methods of measuring the distance between fuzzy numbers have became important due to the significant applications in diverse fields like remote sensing, data mining, pattern recognition, multivariate data analysis and so on. Several distance measures for precise numbers are well established in the literature. Several researchers focused on computing the distance between fuzzy numbers [2, 3, 5, 7–10]. Here we introduce a new distance between two trapezoidal fuzzy numbers by the new approach proposed for them.
This paper is organized as follows.
In Section 2, the basic concept of fuzzy number operation is brought. Section 3 introduces the ranking approach and presents some comparative examples which demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed approach over the exiting methods. A new measure between fuzzy numbers is defined in Section 4. Concluding remarks are finally made in Section 5.
A fuzzy number is a convex fuzzy subset of real line and is completely defined by its membership function. Let be a fuzzy number, whose membership function can generally be defined as where is a constant, is monotonic increasing continuous from the right function, and is monotonic decreasing continuous from the left function. If , then is a normal fuzzy number; otherwise, it is said to be a nonnormal fuzzy number. If the membership function is piecewise linear and continuous, then is referred to as a trapezoidal fuzzy number and is usually denoted by or if . In this case, , , and , . In particular, when , the trapezoidal fuzzy number is reduced to a triangular fuzzy number denoted by or if .
Definition 1 (see ). Consider a general trapezoidal fuzzy number , whose membership function is defined as where . The centroid point of has been determined by
Definition 2. Consider a general trapezoidal fuzzy number ; the area of determined by
3. The Ranking Method
Let be a trapezoidal generalized fuzzy number. We define the particular convex combination of the fuzzy number’s relative locations on the -axis, , and the fuzzy number’s area, , in Definitions 1 and 2, respectively, as follows where the index .
The following choices are related to find approximate approach for rankings fuzzy numbers based on decision maker’s opinions.
A decision maker is able to denote his preference for the fuzzy number’s relative locations on the -axis, , or the fuzzy number’s area, , with ordering suitable index in obtaining approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers. If the decision maker has a preference for then must be chosen in . Also if the area is a choice then must be chosen in .
It is clear that for , the choice is just and for is . If then both and have the same effects.
Now a decision maker can rank a pair of fuzzy numbers, and , using and based on the following rules: (i), then , (ii), then , (iii), then .
4. A New Measure between Two Trapezoidal Generalized Fuzzy Numbers
A decision maker can order a pair of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and , too using based on the following rules: (i), then , (ii), then , (iii), then .
5. Some Properties
Some valuable properties are described in the following, which are useful in ranking a large quantity of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers simultaneously. Assume that there are three different generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, , , and , to be ranked: (i)(ii), (iii)if , and then , (iv)more than two fuzzy numbers can be ranked by comparing with the benchmark fuzzy number. let be the benchmark, , and . By using the previous two properties, obviously . Therefore, if , then ; that is, , (v)the ranking if more than two fuzzy numbers has the robustness property, that is, This equation suggests that the dominance difference between one fuzzy number and the other two fuzzy numbers is insignificant, if the two fuzzy numbers are close to each other. These properties hold since .
Ranking fuzzy numbers is a critical task in a fuzzy decision making process. Particularly, when ranking a large quantity of fuzzy numbers and only limited information about them can be obtained, an effective, efficient, and accurate ranking method becomes necessary. The proposed ranking approach only considers convex combining of the centroid point of and area of a fuzzy number with a decision maker’s optimistic perspectives, that is, actually the measurement of the degree of difference between two fuzzy numbers. This ranking is compared with some exiting ranking methods.
Here too, a new distance measure has been introduced for computing crisp distances for fuzzy numbers.
- L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.
- S. Abbasbandy and S. Hajighasemi, “A fuzzy distance between two fuzzy numbers,” in Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 81 of Applications Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 376–382, 2010.
- S. Abbasbandy and T. Hajjari, “A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 413–419, 2009.
- G. Bortolan and R. Degani, “A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1985.
- C. Chakraborty and D. Chakraborty, “A theoretical development on a fuzzy distance measure for fuzzy numbers,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 254–261, 2006.
- L.-H. Chen and H.-W. Lu, “An approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on left and right dominance,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1589–1602, 2001.
- C.-H. Cheng, “A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 307–317, 1998.
- P. Grzegorzewski, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2004.
- L. Tran and L. Duckstein, “Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2002.
- W. Voxman, “Some remarks on distances between fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 100, pp. 353–365, 1998.
- Y.-M. Wang, J.-B. Yang, D.-L. Xu, and K.-S. Chin, “On the centroids of fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 157, no. 7, pp. 919–926, 2006.