Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 645651, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/645651
Research Article

Modeling and Analyzing Operational Decision-Making Synchronization of C2 Organization in Complex Environment

Air and Missile Defense College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China

Received 5 June 2013; Revised 24 July 2013; Accepted 24 July 2013

Academic Editor: J. A. Tenreiro Machado

Copyright © 2013 Zou Zhigang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Alberts and J. Garstka, Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority (2nd Edition Revised), The Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) Publication Series, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  2. J. R. Butler, Network Centric Warfare (NCW): The Mechanism for Change, ADA520230, Marine Corps University, 2003.
  3. J. Garstka and D. Alberts, Network Centric Operations Conceptual Framework (Version 2.0), Evidence Based Research, 2007.
  4. H. Liu and L. Zhang, “Analysis on opinion emergence of group communication,” Complex Systems and Complexity Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  5. B. Wang, Research on Operation Synchronization Modeling Based on Complex Networks, National University of Defense Technology, 2007.
  6. X. K. Bao, Modeling and Analyzing of Networked Operation Synchronization, National University of Defense Technology, 2009.
  7. S. S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings, “An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 1–45, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. J. Scrocca, M. Molz, and A. Kott, “Collaborative awareness: experiments with tools for battle command,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2006.
  9. A. Kirlik and R. Strauss, “Situation awareness as judgment I: statistical modeling and quantitative measurement,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 463–474, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Strauss and A. Kirlik, “Situation awareness as judgment II: experimental demonstration,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 475–484, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kirlik and R. Strauss, “Situation awareness as judgment I: statistical modeling and quantitative measurement,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 463–474, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Meng and D. G. Zhang, “Model of situation awareness velocity under continuous changing situation,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2909–2913, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Manso and J. Moffat, “Defining and measuring cognitive-entropy and cognitive self-synchronization,” in Proceedings of the International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2011.
  14. M. Ruddy, “ELICIT—the experimental laboratory for investigating collaboration, information sharing and trust,” in Proceedings of the International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2007.
  15. A. H. Dekker, “Average distance as predictor of synchronisability in networks of coupled oscillators,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Australasian Computer Science Conference, vol. 102, pp. 127–131, 2010.
  16. A. H. Dekker, “Analyzing C2 structures and self-synchronization with simple computational models,” in Proceedings of the International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2011.
  17. L. J. Pan, X. J. Li, and D. S. Hao, “Research on modeling of battle collaboration effect,” Journal of System Simulation, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2561–2565, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Holme, “Congestion and centrality in traffic flow on complex networks,” Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 163–176, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Gómez, E. González-Arangüena, C. Manuel, G. Owen, M. del Pozo, and J. Tejada, “Centrality and power in social networks: a game theoretic approach,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 27–54, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. S. A. David and M. James, Network Centric Warfare and Complexity Theory, Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China, 2004.
  21. Y. Liu, J. Zhao, J. N. Liu, D. J. Feng, and G. Y. Wang, “Novel battlefield electromagnetic environment classification method based on combat efficacy of weapon systems,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1059–1062, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. C. Gong, Y. C. Jiang, and H. Chen, “Command and control in the network-centric warfare,” Fire Control & Command, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Wu and Y. J. Tan, “Finding the most vital node by node contraction in communication networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1283–1286, May 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Zhao, Z. Wang, J. Zheng, and X. Guo, “Finding most vital node by node importance contribution matrix in communication networks,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1076–1079, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Jiang, Research on Executable Architecture and the Executable Method of DoDAF, National University of Defense Technology, 2008.