Matching Cost Filtering for Dense Stereo Correspondence

Table 2

Evaluation for stereo methods on all 27 Middlebury stereo pairs.

Method	Aloe	Baby1	Baby2	Baby3	Bowling1	Bowling2	Cloth1	Cloth2	Cloth3	Cloth4
HCN	12.71	11.14	11.81	17.87	26.70	19.10	9.71	16.37	11.15	14.95
GIN	13.42	12.39	12.88	17.98	27.37	19.19	10.36	16.56	11.30	15.40
HCR	8.19	4.99	7.24	9.74	20.69	14.38	4.61	10.96	5.34	10.66
GIR	8.78	5.41	7.59	9.99	20.26	14.61	5.03	11.43	5.43	10.81
Method	Flowerpots	Lampshade1	Lampshade2	Midd1	Midd2	Monopoly	Plastic	Rocks1	Rocks2	Wood1
HCN	23.60	23.03	30.95	45.66	41.66	36.51	43.62	11.90	12.24	16.78
GIN	23.41	24.13	32.64	46.58	42.90	34.78	47.81	11.72	11.83	17.61
HCR	18.48	15.86	23.46	43.95	37.30	22.71	35.60	5.72	5.19	5.26
GIR	18.81	16.67	24.01	44.35	38.62	25.01	38.33	5.55	5.02	5.57
Method	Wood2	Art	Books	Dolls	Laundry	Moebius	Reindeer	AE
HCN	15.43	26.26	21.59	17.32	27.98	20.32	21.96	21.79
GIN	14.83	26.41	21.10	16.68	29.19	20.06	23.12	22.28
HCR	0.64	18.60	17.85	11.90	20.80	14.68	8.19	14.92
GIR	0.57	18.59	17.50	11.96	22.80	14.22	8.36	15.38