Research Article
Matching Cost Filtering for Dense Stereo Correspondence
Table 4
Evaluation on illumination-variant stereo pairs with different weight coefficient.
| | | 0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1 | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc |
| −25% | 3.33 | 4.24 | 12.27 | 3.86 | 4.82 | 13.50 | 15.7 | 16.8 | 27.2 | 40.9 | 41.6 | 48.1 | 67.0 | 67.3 | 69.9 | −20% | 3.12 | 4.00 | 11.96 | 3.47 | 4.36 | 12.80 | 17.0 | 18.1 | 27.9 | 40.8 | 41.5 | 46.5 | 60.2 | 60.6 | 62.6 | −15% | 2.97 | 3.84 | 11.65 | 3.27 | 4.10 | 11.86 | 18.8 | 19.7 | 29.0 | 44.8 | 45.3 | 46.6 | 55.4 | 55.8 | 55.4 | −10% | 3.03 | 3.93 | 11.87 | 3.43 | 4.22 | 11.23 | 18.0 | 18.7 | 25.3 | 41.4 | 41.8 | 41.9 | 44.7 | 45.0 | 43.7 | −5% | 3.08 | 4.07 | 12.24 | 3.25 | 4.01 | 10.50 | 12.5 | 13.3 | 19.2 | 25.1 | 25.7 | 27.9 | 26.4 | 27.0 | 29.0 | 0% | 3.21 | 4.21 | 12.36 | 2.14 | 2.94 | 9.16 | 1.95 | 2.75 | 9.18 | 2.19 | 3.09 | 9.63 | 2.24 | 3.15 | 9.73 | 5% | 3.33 | 4.32 | 12.47 | 2.25 | 3.09 | 9.79 | 10.9 | 11.7 | 16.3 | 21.3 | 21.9 | 23.5 | 22.4 | 23.0 | 24.2 | 10% | 3.51 | 4.54 | 13.12 | 3.22 | 4.10 | 11.45 | 19.8 | 20.5 | 23.6 | 41.2 | 41.4 | 38.1 | 42.6 | 42.8 | 39.3 | 15% | 3.85 | 4.88 | 13.74 | 3.88 | 4.82 | 13.03 | 20.5 | 21.3 | 26.3 | 49.5 | 49.9 | 46.0 | 52.3 | 52.6 | 48.8 | 20% | 4.09 | 5.14 | 14.39 | 4.23 | 5.24 | 14.17 | 19.0 | 20.1 | 29.6 | 54.4 | 54.9 | 53.7 | 59.2 | 59.5 | 59.0 | 25% | 4.54 | 5.62 | 15.32 | 4.67 | 5.76 | 15.37 | 20.0 | 21.1 | 31.6 | 53.1 | 53.7 | 54.3 | 62.0 | 62.5 | 62.6 |
|
|