Research Article  Open Access
Li Wang, Xiaoming Liu, Zhijian Wang, Zhengxi Li, "Urban Traffic Signal System Control Structural Optimization Based on Network Analysis", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 706919, 9 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/706919
Urban Traffic Signal System Control Structural Optimization Based on Network Analysis
Abstract
Advanced urban traffic signal control systems such as SCOOT and SCATS normally coordinate traffic network using multilevel hierarchical control mechanism. In this mechanism, several key intersections will be selected from traffic signal network and the network will be divided into different control subareas. Traditionally, key intersection selection and control subareas division are executed according to dynamic traffic counts and link length between intersections, which largely rely on traffic engineers’ experience. However, it omits important inherent characteristics of traffic network topology. In this paper, we will apply network analysis approach into these two aspects for traffic system control structure optimization. Firstly, the modified Cmeans clustering algorithm will be proposed to assess the importance of intersections in traffic network and furthermore determine the key intersections based on three indexes instead of merely on traffic counts in traditional methods. Secondly, the improved network community discovery method will be used to give more reasonable evidence in traffic control subarea division. Finally, to test the effectiveness of network analysis approach, a hardwareinloop simulation environment composed of regional traffic control system, microsimulation software and signal controller hardware, will be built. Both traditional method and proposed approach will be implemented on simulation test bed to evaluate traffic operation performance indexes, for example, travel time, stop times, delay and average vehicle speed. Simulation results show that the proposed network analysis approach can improve the traffic control system operation performance effectively.
1. Introduction
Advanced urban traffic signal control systems normally use multilevel hierarchical control mechanism to simplify the network control process. In this mechanism, several key intersections of traffic network will be selected and the network will be divided into several control subareas in which the signal of intersections will be optimized according to the traffic states variation of key intersections. In 1971, Walinchus [1] firstly built the concept of “traffic control subarea.” Stockfisch [2], Pinell et al. [3] and Kell and Fullerton [4] proposed the guideline for computer signal system selection based on intersection traffic state analysis, road segment length, vehicle arrival rate, and so forth. Yagoda et al. [5] and Chang [6] defined the traffic control index and threshold value of algorithm for traffic control subarea division. However, they have not considered the characteristics of dynamic traffic network topology, and typical advanced traffic signal control systems like SCOOT [7] and SCATS [8] normally executed the “control subarea division” and “key intersection selection” based on traffic counts and link length between intersections. In practice, this configuration process relies on the experience of traffic engineers [9, 10]. It is difficult to assure the reasonability and effectiveness of the system control structure configuration because of lack of reliable theoretical support.
Generally traffic network can be represented as a weighted network graph, where an intersection corresponds to a node, a road segments to a link, and traffic flow parameters of the segments (like traffic flow, link length, travel time, etc.) to link weight. This type of weighted network has typical topology characteristics like nonhomogeneousness and scalefree. However traditional traffic signal system structure configuration does not consider these characteristics. It is necessary to apply traffic network analysis method to reduce the uncertainty of traffic network control configuration and ensure the process of key intersection selection and subarea division.
Recently, there are several papers and research results in this area. In aspect of key node assessment, several approaches can be referred, for example, the betweenness method, node deletion method, node contraction method, network nodes nearness and neighborhood key degrees assessment, and so forth [11, 12]. In aspect of network subarea division, it is found be similar with the network community discovery. Although there are several community discovery algorithms have been developed, to the best knowledge of authors, there is still lack of direct findings on how to realize the control structure optimization for traffic signal networks. For example, KL algorithm [13] needs to know the size of the two communities; spectrum bisection method [14] can only divide the network into odd communities; GN algorithm [15] cannot confirm the suitable iteration process easily while amount of the community structure is unknown; and WH algorithm [16] is mainly used to dig the community structure that contains designated nodes.
In this paper, we will improve the network analysis approaches and apply them into traffic signal control field, especially using modified Cmeans clustering method for node assessment and improved community discovery algorithm for control subarea division. In Section 2, traffic network will be abstracted as network graph and typical indicators of network graph are introduced. In Section 3, traffic signal intersection importance assessment will be implemented by the Cmeans clustering approach. And then community discovery algorithm will be applied to the implementation of traffic signal network subarea division in Section 4. Finally, experiment conducted by SCOOT system and VISSIM simulation platform will be constructed to compare and verify the effectiveness of network analysis approach based on real traffic data of Beijing city.
2. Traffic Network Modeling
As mentioned above, urban traffic network can be abstracted as a weighted graph in which the intersection corresponds to a node, the road section to a link, and the link length to the link weight. Based on this type of weighted network graph, the following indicators will be used in this paper.(1)Node connectivity (i.e., node degree) : the number of links connecting to node .(2)Node betweenness : the ratio of the number of the shortest path crossing the node to all the shortest paths between the nodes in the network:
where indicates the number of the shortest paths through node between node and node and is the number of all the shortest paths between node and node .(3)Network module degree :
where is a symmetrical matrix with elements representing the ratio of the number of links connecting community and to the number of whole network links, and ; is the trace of matrix .
3. Traffic Network Node Importance Assessment Based on Clustering
It is known that weighted network normally has typical nonhomogeneous and scalefree characteristics, which means that the importance of each node in traffic network is different. Existing network nodes importance assessment methods are basically derived from graph theory and need to be improved for traffic control application. In traffic engineering fields, we normally describe the signal intersection as “key,” “important,” “general,” “unimportant,” and other types. Therefore, we select Cmeans clustering method [17] to classify the traffic intersections of network.
CMeans clustering method can be used to classify the nodes of network into different categories and describe the degree of node in each category. The basic ideas of the clustering process can be described as follows: assume the cluster centers and calculate distance from each node to the centers; adjust the cluster centers according to the sum of distance until the clustering process meets minimize conditions.
Specifically, suppose that there are samples , where , is the eigenvector of sample ; , is the number of categories that all samples will be divided into; constitutes a cluster prototype matrix, where is the th clustering prototype; is a matrix with elements meaning the degree of sample to ; then the objective function of clustering can be expressed as
where is a flexible parameter in and represents Euclidean distance between and .
It is obvious that the type of data samples is important for clustering. In traffic network, the data samples for assessments of intersection not only need to reflect the static topology characteristics, but also need to contain the information of dynamic traffic flow. In this paper we select three typical indicators to form the data samples of each network node.(1)Node connectivity reflects the characteristics of the topology of the node.(2)Node betweenness reflects the control ability of nodes among the network traffic flow dissemination.(3)Node traffic flow in rush hour reflects the dynamic traffic counts variation and capacity of the intersections.
Then, the node assessment algorithm can be described by the following steps.
Step 1 (parameter settings). The data sample includes three items: node degree , node betweenness , and rush hour traffic counts. Let category factor be corresponding to different number of node categories. To realize the advantages of clustering, let index , iteration termination threshold , initial iteration counter and then produce a prototype model of clustering .
Step 2. Calculate the partition matrix . For for all , , if , there are ; if , such that , there is ; and when , there is .
Step 3. Update cluster prototype matrix , .
Step 4. If , the algorithm stops and outputs partition matrix and cluster prototype ; otherwise let and turn to (2). Normally can use norm; that is, .
4. Traffic Control Subarea Division Based on Community Discovery
In this paper, using the network module degree in (2) as assessment indicator, we modify Newman cohesion community discovery [18] approach for traffic control subarea division. The division algorithm can be described as follows.
Step 1. Divide the traffic network diagram into communities which means that each node represents one community. The initial and the sum of its rows of matrix satisfy
where is the degree of node and is the total number of links in the network.
Step 2. Merge the communities that contain links and record the increment of the network module degree . Merging should be executed along the direction that can make toward maximum values. Then, renew and add the ranks and rows related to the community and .
Step 3. Repeat Step 2 until the whole network merges into one community.
Step 4. Consider the dendrogram of community structure and select the max module degree. Then, determine the optimal division of network community.
5. Experiment
5.1. Traffic Network Modeling
Choose Wangjing area in Beijing illustrated in Figure 1(a) as test bed to evaluate the effectiveness of above proposed traffic control network structure optimization methods. The abstracted weighted network graph can be referred to in Figure 1(b).
(a)
(b)
5.2. Experiment Traffic Data Collection
On the basis of traffic raw data in October 17, 2011 from Beijing Traffic Management Bureau, we calculate the indexes of node degree, nodes betweenness, and node rush hour (18:0019:00) traffic flow as shown in Table 1. The calculation process follows steps as follows.(1)Calculate the node degree of each node according to the weighted network topology.(2)Calculate the weight of sides of each segment according to the link length, the distance matrix between the nodes, and the shortest distance . Then acquire the number of each node in the shortest distance matrix to calculate the betweenness of each node.(3)Count the vehicle flow data in rush hours and calculate the flow rate for each intersection.

5.3. Intersection Importance Assessment
Apply Cmeans clustering algorithm described in Section 3 to get network nodes importance clustering. Figures 2 and 3 show the cluster distribution as and , respectively, in which axis means the node degree, axis means node rush hour traffic flow (veh/hour), and axis means the node betweenness. Figure 2(b) shows the plane projection of node betweenness and traffic flow indicators when .
(a)
(b)
Practically traffic signal control systems generally take traffic nodes as three categories: key node, important node, and general node. For convenience, take 3 categories to cluster the network intersections. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show that:(1)the node degree of cluster centers is almost 2.5 or 3.5 which means that the key node should have node degree of 3 or 4;(2)node betweenness of cluster center nodes are 0.018, 0.023. and 0.042, respectively;(3)rush hour traffic flow of cluster center nodes is 1600 veh/hour, 3100 veh/hour, and 6500 veh/hour respectively.
It is very close to the key node selection criteria in traffic engineering practice. We can choose node 8, node 11, node 14, node 16, node 24, and node 32 as the key nodes as big points shown in Figure 4 and bold in Table 1.
5.4. Traffic Control Subarea Division
Complete the community merging process mentioned in Section 4 and record the value of module degree at each step. The variation curve is shown in Figure 5 in which the horizontal axis represents the combination times and the vertical axis represents the module degree.
From the module degree change curve in Figure 5, we can see that the 17th calculation corresponds to the maximum value of network module degree , which means that when , we can get the best community discovery division of network. The result of proposed community discovery is shown as Figure 6 and the corresponding division of traffic control subarea of Wangjing network is shown as in Figure 7. It is necessary to mention that there are two key traffic intersections selected in Section 5.3 locating in the same control subarea. For this situation, we need to decide the right one according to the requirement of practice.
5.5. Traffic Simulation
To test the effectiveness of network analysis approach, a hardwareinloop simulation environment has been built as the following steps: construct the traffic network simulation of Wangjing area based on VISSIM simulation platform and implement online realtime control on road network with PCSCOOT system. To avoid the influence of signal control algorithm to different control structure configuration, the same traffic signal control algorithm has been applied in simulation with traditional configuration based on distance between intersections and node traffic flow shown as Figure 8 and proposed configuration by this paper as Figure 7.
Configurate the simulated road network using PCSCOOT system as the following steps: set the SCOOT system structure by traditional method and proposed method separately; assign the control subareas and the intersections Modern and IP address utilizing the DBAS commands; make configuration to each intersection in detail; set the simulated intersection model with IP address, phase information, and detector information of signal controller utilizing VB software based on VISSIM COM interface; set traffic detectors at Wangjingxi Road and Guangshunbei Street (as shown in Figure 8) in VISSIM model and input traffic data. Then, three different traffic demand inputs: 300 veh/hour/lane, 600 veh/hour/lane, and 1000 veh/hour/lane, have been loaded separately into the network to simulate the traffic state in low hour, flat hour and rush hour of one day.
Tables 2 and 3 show the traffic operation performance comparison of SCOOT system based on traditional approach and proposed network approach. In Table 2, the SCOOT system based on proposed method achieves better operation performance during low hour, flat hour, and rush hour. Specially, the travel time from North to South of Wangjingxi Road average decreased by 3.1% and from South to North of Wangjingxi Road average decreased by 7.3%; the travel time from South to North of Guangshunbei Street decreased by 31.41% and from North to South decreased 1.35%.


In Table 3, traffic network performance has been improved based on proposed configuration method, in which the network average stop delay decreased by 12.5%, the network average stops decreased by 19.61% and the network average speed increased by 11.74%. It is obviously verifying the availability and feasibility of the proposed approach in this paper.
6. Conclusion and Future Research
Traditional key intersection selection and control subarea division method for advanced traffic signal control system do not consider the inherent characteristic of topology structure of the traffic network. In this paper, we use three different indexes based on network analysis to integrate the network topology structure indicators with traffic flow conditions which reflect the characteristic of the network from both static and dynamic aspects. It is more reasonable in theoretical analysis and traffic engineering in practice. Moreover, the advanced community discovery methods are applied to establish or adjust the traffic network control structure before the traffic signal control system come into operation where the proposed approach does not change their original system control strategy and signal optimization algorithm. In our traffic simulation research, compared to traditional method, the proposed control structure optimization approach will obviously decrease the travel time and stops of the test area. It really provides strong support for the application of this network control structural optimization in traffic signal network control.
However, the following issues still need to be aware of in future research: how to achieve more reasonable concordance between key node assessment and control subarea division in practice; whether the dynamic division of subcontrol area is feasible and how to actualize this process; whether the stability of the network traffic control system will be affected after network analysis approach is applied.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This paper was supported by China National Natural Science Foundation (51308005), Scientific Research Project of Beijing Education Committee (PXM2013_014212_000029, 000031, 000028, KM20111009011), the Importation and Development of HighCaliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institution (CIT&TCD201304002), and China National 863 High Technology Plan (2012AA112401).
References
 R. J. Walinchus, “Realtime network decomposition and sub network interfacing,” Highway Research Record, pp. 20–28, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
 C. R. Stockfisch, “Guidelines for computer signal system selection in urban areas,” Traffic Engineering, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 30–63, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Pinnell, J. J. DeShazo Jr., and R. L. Wilshire, “Areawide traffic control systems,” Traffic Engineering & Control, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 16–20, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
 J. H. Kell and I. J. Fullerton, Manual of Traffic Signal Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
 H. N. Yagoda, E. H. Principe, C. E. Vick, and B. G. Leonard, “Subdivision of signal systems into control areas,” Traffic Engineering, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 42–46, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
 E. C.P. Chang, “Evaluation of interconnected arterial traffic signals,” Transportation Planning Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 137–156, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 P. B. Hunt, D. I. Robertson, and R. I. Winton, “SCOOT—a traffic responsive method of coordinating signals,” TRL Laboratory Report 1014, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
 ATS Technology (HK) Limited, “SCATS Adaptive Control Introduction,” pp. 17–21, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Papageorgiou, C. Diakaki, V. Dinopoulou, A. Kotsialos, and Y. Wang, “Review of road traffic control strategies,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 2043–2067, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Bretherton, M. Bodger, N. Baber, and S. Controls, “SCOOT—the future [urban traffic control],” in Procceding of 12th IEEE International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, pp. 301–306, April 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 A.L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 A.M. Kermarrec, E. Le Merrer, B. Sericola, and G. Trédan, “Second order centrality: distributed assessment of nodes criticity in complex networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 619–628, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. W. Kernighan and S. Lin, “A efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs,” The Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 49, pp. 291–307, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Pothen, H. D. Simon, and K.P. Liou, “Partitioning sparse matrices with eigenvectors of graphs,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 430–452, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman, “Community structure in social and biological networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 7821–7826, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 F. Wu and B. A. Huberman, “Finding communities in linear time: a physics approach,” European Physical Journal B, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 331–338, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. N. Ahmed, S. M. Yamany, N. Mohamed, A. A. Farag, and T. Moriarty, “A modified fuzzy Cmeans algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 193–199, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. E. J. Newman, “Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 6, Article ID 066133, 5 pages, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Li Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.