A Comparative Analysis of Nature-Inspired Optimization Approaches to 2D Geometric Modelling for Turbomachinery Applications

Table 5

𝑃 values of post hoc multiple comparisons.

i	Algorithms	z	Unadjusted P	Holm P
10	DE versus PSO	8.981462	0	0.005
9	DE versus IWO	8.164966	0	0.005556
8	BGA versus PSO	6.531973	0	0.00625
7	BGA versus IWO	5.715476	0	0.007143
6	RCGA versus DE	4.898979	0.000001	0.008333
5	RCGA versus PSO	4.082483	0.000045	0.01
4	RCGA versus IWO	3.265986	0.001091	0.0125
3	RCGA versus BGA	2.44949	0.014306	0.016667
2	BGA versus DE	2.44949	0.014306	0.025
1	PSO versus IWO	0.816497	0.414216	0.05