Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 728534, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/728534
Research Article

The Application of Shape Gradient for the Incompressible Fluid in Shape Optimization

1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi 710049, China
2Center for Computational Geosciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi 710049, China
3School of Science, Chang'an University, Shaanxi 710064, China

Received 20 November 2012; Revised 4 March 2013; Accepted 7 March 2013

Academic Editor: Jun Jiang

Copyright © 2013 Wenjing Yan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Pironneau, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems, Springer Series in Computational Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1984. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau, Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids, The Clarendon Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. J. Simon, “Domain variation for drag in Stokes flow,” in Control Theory of Distributed Parameter Systems and Applications, vol. 159 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp. 28–42, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. J. A. Bello, E. Fernández Cara, and J. Simon, “The variation of the drag with respect to the domain in Navier-Stokes flow,” in Optimization, Optimal Control, Partial Differential Equations, vol. 107 of International Series of Numerical Mathematics, pp. 287–296, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. J. A. Bello, E. Fernández-Cara, J. Lemoine, and J. Simon, “The differentiability of the drag with respect to the variations of a Lipschitz domain in a Navier-Stokes flow,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 626–640, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, vol. 4 of Advances in Design and Control, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001. View at MathSciNet
  7. W.-J. Yan and Y.-C. Ma, “Shape reconstruction of an inverse Stokes problem,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 554–562, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. D. Chenais, J. Monnier, and J. P. Vila, “Shape optimal design problem with convective and radiative heat transfer: analysis and implementation,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 75–117, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, vol. 65, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  10. O. Pironneau, “Optimal shape design by local boundary variations,” in Optimal Shape Design, vol. 1740 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 343–384, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. G. Dogan, P. Morin, R. H. Nochetto, and M. Verani, “Discrete gradient flows for shape optimization and applications,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 37–40, pp. 3898–3914, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. J. Simon, “Differentiation with respect to the domain in boundary value problems,” Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, vol. 2, no. 7-8, pp. 649–687, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. Quarteroni, R. Sacco, and F. Saleri, Numerical Mathematics, vol. 37 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  14. O. C. Zienkiewicz and J. Z. Zhu, “The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. I. The recovery technique,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1331–1364, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. J. Dompierre, P. Labb, and F. Guibault, “Controlling approximation error,” in Proceedings of the 2nd MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, pp. 1929–1932, Elsevier, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2003.
  16. F. Hecht, “A few snags in mesh adaptation loops,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Meshing Roundtable, pp. 301–302, Springer, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2005.
  17. R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, Theory and Numerical Analysis, AMS Chelsea, Providence, RI, USA, 2001. View at MathSciNet
  18. V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Algorithms, vol. 5 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet