Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 784275, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784275
Research Article

Pessimistic Portfolio Choice with One Safe and One Risky Asset and Right Monotone Probability Difference Order

1School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China
2School of Science, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332005, China
3School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
4School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received 1 June 2013; Revised 10 October 2013; Accepted 14 October 2013

Academic Editor: Francesco Pellicano

Copyright © 2013 Jiangfeng Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. D. Hey, “The economics of optimism and pessimism: a definition and some application,” Kyklos, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 181–205, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Quiggin, “A theory of anticipated utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 323–343, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Quiggin and P. Wakker, “The axiomatic basis of anticipated utility: a clarification,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 486–499, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Rothschild and J. E. Stiglitz, “Increasing risk. II. Its economic consequences,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 3, pp. 66–84, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. P. C. Fishburn and R. B. Porter, “Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: effects of changes in rate of return and risk,” Management Science, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1064–1073, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. J. Hadar and T. K. Seo, “The effects of shifts in a return distribution on optimal portfolios,” International Economic Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 721–736, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. J. Meyer and M. B. Ormiston, “Strong increases in risk and their comparative statics,” International Economic Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 425–437, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. J. M. Black and G. Bulkley, “A ratio criterion for signing the effects of an increase in uncertainty,” International Economic Review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. G. Dionne, L. Eeckhoudt, and C. Gollier, “Increases in risk and linear payoffs,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 410–424, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. M. Landsberger and I. Meilijson, “Demand for risky financial assets: a portfolio analysis,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 204–213, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. L. Eeckhoudt and C. Gollier, “Demand for risky assets and the monotone probability ratio order,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. C. Gollier, “The comparative statics of changes in risk revisited,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 522–535, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. B. Hollifield and A. Kraus, “Defining bad news: changes in return distributions that decrease risky asset demand,” Management Science, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1227–1236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. S. Athey, “Monotone comparative statics under uncertainty,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 187–223, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. J. Quiggin, “Comparative statics for rank-dependent expected utility theory,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 339–350, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. M. Landsberger and I. Meilijson, “Co-monotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 52, pp. 97–106, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. P. Milgrom and C. Shannon, “Monotone comparative statics,” Econometrica, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 157–180, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. J. Quiggin, “Economic choice in generalized expected utility theory,” Theory and Decision, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 153–171, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. P. Slovic, “Perception of risk,” Science, vol. 236, no. 4799, pp. 280–285, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. H. Chew, E. Karni, and Z. Safra, “Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 370–381, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. J. Quiggin, Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model, Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 1993.
  22. S. M. Zhang and H. Zhao, Financial Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business Publishers, Beijing, China, 2010.
  23. M. E. Yaari, “The dual theory of choice under risk,” Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 95–115, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. A. Hau, “A general theorem on the comparative statics of changes in risk,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Chateauneuf, M. Cohen, and I. Meilijson, “Four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 547–571, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. Chateauneuf, M. Cohen, and I. Meilijson, “More pessimism than greediness: a characterization of monotone risk aversion in the rank-dependent expected utility model,” Economic Theory, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 649–667, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. C. S. Webb and H. Zank, “Accounting for optimism and pessimism in expected utility,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 706–717, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet