Consensus of the Distributed Varying Scale Wireless Sensor Networks

<table>In topology <svg height="15.375" id="M312" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.2875004 15.375" width="8.2875004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,90,90)">
<path d="m -71.95,70.93 6.53,0" style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.68000001;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-miterlimit:10;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-dasharray:none"></path>
</g>
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,15.1)"><path d="M241 635q53 0 94 -28.5t63.5 -76t33.5 -102.5t11 -116q0 -58 -11 -112.5t-34 -103.5t-63.5 -78.5t-94.5 -29.5t-95 28t-64.5 75t-34.5 102.5t-11 118.5q0 58 11.5 112.5t34.5 103t64.5 78t95.5 29.5zM238 602q-32 0 -55.5 -25t-35.5 -68t-17.5 -91t-5.5 -105
q0 -76 10 -138.5t37 -107.5t69 -45q32 0 55.5 25t35.5 68.5t17.5 91.5t5.5 105t-5.5 105.5t-18 92t-36 68t-56.5 24.5z" id="x30"></path></g>
</svg>, the node attached components of 1 and 3 achieve the potential consensus, respectively.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Consensus of the Distributed Varying Scale Wireless Sensor Networks

Figure 2