Research Article
The Effect of Labeled/Unlabeled Prior Information for Masseter Segmentation
Table 1
Accuracy results for all data sets and methods.
| Case | M. a | M. b | M. c | M. d | M. e |
| Case | 66.66 | 88.24 | 86.87 | 86.98 | 93.07 | Case | 83.23 | 86.12 | 93.33 | 93.37 | 83.74 | Case | 76.72 | 88.01 | 84.18 | 71.56 | 90.03 | Case | 30.24 | 49.92 | 82.86 | 82.68 | 78.39 | Case | 84.75 | 19.34 | 78.9 | 84.16 | 90.67 | Case | 60.98 | 75.3 | 77.56 | 59.88 | 77.23 | Case | 81.97 | 68.97 | 74.38 | 71.89 | 66.49 | Case | 82.16 | 92.65 | 75.68 | 89.14 | 93.4 | Case | 83.35 | 82.4 | 90.71 | 94.69 | 96.11 | Case | 79.13 | 68.25 | 92.89 | 91.05 | 96.07 |
| Average | 72.92 | 71.92 | 83.74 | 82.54 | 86.52 |
|
|