Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 124652, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/124652
Research Article

Selection of Key Component Vendor from the Aspects of Capability, Productivity, and Reliability

1Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Sec. 4, Keelung Road, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
2Graduate Institute of Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Sec. 4, Keelung Road, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
3Faculty of Development Economics, University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, No. 144 Xuan Thuy Road, Cau Giay District, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam

Received 16 March 2014; Revised 2 June 2014; Accepted 8 June 2014; Published 2 July 2014

Academic Editor: W. Y. Szeto

Copyright © 2014 Vincent F. Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. H. I. Lee, “A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2879–2893, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Nepal, L. Monplaisir, and O. Famuyiwa, “Matching product architecture with supply chain design,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 312–325, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. M. Pero, N. Abdelkafi, A. Sianesi, and T. Blecker, “A framework for the alignment of new product development and supply chains,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Chang, C. Chang, and C. Wu, “Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1850–1858, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Bruno, E. Esposito, A. Genovese, and R. Passaro, “AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: problems and perspectives,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 159–172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Elahi, “Outsourcing through competition: what is the best competition parameter?” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 370–382, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Punniyamoorthy, P. Mathiyalagan, and P. Parthiban, “A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 458–474, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. H. I. Lee, H. Kang, and C. Chang, “Fuzzy multiple goal programming applied to TFT-LCD supplier selection by downstream manufacturers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 6318–6325, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Shaw, R. Shankar, S. S. Yadav, and L. S. Thakur, “Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 8182–8192, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. K. P. Anagnostopoulos, M. Gratziou, and A. P. Vavatsikos, “Using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for selecting wastewater facilities at prefectrure level,” European Water, pp. 15–24, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. I. Chamodrakas, D. Batis, and D. Martakos, “Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 490–498, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. A. Bana e Costa and J.-C. Vansnick, “A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 1422–1428, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. O. Çakir, “On the order of the preference intensities in fuzzy AHP,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 993–1005, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Mikhailov, “Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 365–385, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. O. Kilincci and S. A. Onal, “Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9656–9664, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Ku, C. Chang, and H. Ho, “Global supplier selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy goal programming,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 623–640, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Rezaei and R. Ortt, “Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Shim and B. Lee, “Sustainable competitive advantage of a system goods innovator in a market with network effects and entry threats,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 308–317, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J.-L. Chen, “The synergistic effects of IT-enabled resources on organizational capabilities and firm performance,” Information and Management, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 142–150, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Harmancioglu, “Portfolio of controls in outsourcing relationships for global new product development,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 394–403, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Zhang and X. Liang, “Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: the case of China Mobile,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 156–171, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. J. Wu and G. L. Ragatz, “Evaluating the total effect of early supplier involvement on project team effectiveness: collaboration and interaction,” International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 239–259, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. L. Esper, A. E. Ellinger, T. P. Stank, D. J. Flint, and M. Moon, “Demand and supply integration: a conceptual framework of value creation through knowledge management,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Hilletofth and D. Eriksson, “Coordinating new product development with supply chain management,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 264–281, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Roshandel, S. S. Miri-Nargesi, and L. Hatami-Shirkouhi, “Evaluating and selecting the supplier in detergent production industry using hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 24, pp. 10170–10181, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Zouggari and L. Benyoucef, “Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 507–519, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Wu, D. D. Wu, Y. Zhang, and D. L. Olson, “Supply chain outsourcing risk using an integrated stochastic-fuzzy optimization approach,” Information Sciences, vol. 235, pp. 242–258, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Kristianto, P. Helo, J. R. Jiao, and M. Sandhu, “Adaptive fuzzy vendor managed inventory control for mitigating the Bullwhip effect in supply chains,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 346–355, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. L. Osiro, F. R. Lima-Junior, and L. C. R. Carpinetti, “A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 153, pp. 95–112, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. Chen and R. Chao, “Supplier selection using consistent fuzzy preference relations,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3233–3240, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C.-Y. Shen and K.-T. Yu, “Enhancing the efficacy of supplier selection decision-making on the initial stage of new product development: a hybrid fuzzy approach considering the strategic and operational factors simultaneously,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11271–11281, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. Ruuska, T. Ahola, M. Martinsuo, and T. Westerholm, “Supplier capabilities in large shipbuilding projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 542–553, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus