Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 247248, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/247248
Research Article

Dimension-Specific Efficiency Measurement Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Institute of Command and Information Systems, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China

Received 26 October 2014; Revised 6 December 2014; Accepted 6 December 2014; Published 25 December 2014

Academic Editor: Wei-Chiang Hong

Copyright © 2014 Hongjun Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  3. S. Lim, H. Bae, and L. H. Lee, “A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7665–7673, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Yang and H. Morita, “Efficiency improvement from multiple perspectives: an application to Japanese banking industry,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 501–509, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Aleskerov, H. Ersel, and R. Yolalan, “Multicriterial ranking approach for evaluating bank branch performance,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 321–335, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Speelman, M. D'Haese, J. Buysse, and L. D'Haese, “A measure for the efficiency of water use and its determinants, a case study of small-scale irrigation schemes in North-West Province, South Africa,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. D. Taminia, B. Larue, and G. West, “Technical and environmental efficiencies and best management practices in agriculture,” Applied Economics, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 1659–1672, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Hollingsworth, “The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery,” Health Economics, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1107–1128, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Peck, “Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment healthcare benchmarking and performance evaluation: analysis (DEA),” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1302–1302, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. G. Barbosa and V. E. Wilhelm, “Evaluation of the performance of public schools through data envelopment analysis,” Acta Scientiarum—Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. C. Portela, A. S. Camanho, and A. Keshvari, “Assessing the evolution of school performance and value-added: trends over four years,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Lozano, E. Gutiérrez, and P. Moreno, “Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1665–1676, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Lozano and E. Gutiérrez, “Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 131–139, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. K. Hong, S. H. Ha, C. K. Shin, S. C. Park, and S. H. Kim, “Evaluating the efficiency of system integration projects using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and machine learning,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 283–296, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W.-M. Lu and M.-H. Chen, “A benchmark-learning roadmap for the Military Finance Center,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, no. 9-10, pp. 1833–1843, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. M. Wagner and D. G. Shimshak, “Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: procedures and managerial perspectives,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Sun, J. Wu, and D. Guo, “Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 6301–6310, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. C. Tofallis, “Input efficiency profiling: an application to airlines,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 253–258, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus