Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 309675, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/309675
Research Article

The Application of the SCT and the ANP Model to Refine the Most Critical ICT Determinants in Minimizing the Digital Divide

Department of International Business, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403, Taiwan

Received 8 June 2014; Accepted 31 July 2014; Published 31 August 2014

Academic Editor: Teen-Hang Meen

Copyright © 2014 Ming-Yuan Hsieh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Qureshi and D. Compeau, “Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: a comparison of covariance- and component-based SEM,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 199–216, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Egghe, “The hirsch index and related impact measures,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 65–114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Lu and K. L. Hsiao, “Gender differences in reasons for frequent blog posting,” Online Information Review, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 135–156, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, “User experience—a research agenda,” Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Hassenzahl and D. Ullrich, “To do or not to do: differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Y. Chiu and E. Weng, “Integration of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and grey relation for job oriented heuristics scheduling system,” National Taipei University of Technology School Press, Taipei, Taiwan, 1994.
  7. R. Cullen, “Addressing the digital divide,” Online Information Review, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 311–320, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Bonfadelli, “The Internet and knowledge gaps: a theoretical and empirical investigation,” European Journal of Communication, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. De Hann, “A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide,” IT & Society, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 66–88, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Chowdury, “Access to information in digital libraries: users and digital divide,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries, New Delhi, India, February 2004, http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/2622/1/strathprints002622.pdf.
  11. C. Yanhong, “Shuzi honggou wenti yanjiu shuping (a review of digital divide researches),” Qingbao Zazhi (Journal of Information), vol. 2, pp. 15–45, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. B. Luyt, “Who benefits from the digital divide?” First Monday, vol. 9, no. 8, 2004, http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_8luyt/index.html. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Warschauer, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2004.
  14. BBC, “Digital divide could be deepening,” BBC News, 2006, http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2006/10/bbc_news_digita.html.
  15. S. Aqili and A. Moghaddam, “Bridging the digital divide: the role of librarians and information professionals in the third millennium,” Electronic Library, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 226–237, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. D. Chinn and R. W. Fairlie, The Determinants of the Global Digital Divide: A Cross-Country Analysis, Economic Growth Center, 2004, http://www.econ.yale.edu/growth_pdf/cdp881.pdf.
  17. C.-Y. Huang and H.-N. Chen, “Global digital divide: a dynamic analysis based on the bass model,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 248–264, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Galperin, “Goodbye digital divide, hello digital confusion? A critical embrace of the emerging ICT4D consensus,” Information Technologies & International Development, vol. 6, pp. 53–55, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. Science and Development Network, How mobile phones increased the digital divide, 2014, http://www.scidev.net/global/data/scidev-net-at-large/how-mobile-phones-increased-the-digital-divide.html.
  20. N. E. Miller and J. Dollard, Social Learning and Imitation, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, USA, 1941.
  21. P. Norris, “The worldwide digital divide; information poverty and development,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting for the Political Studies Association of the UK, London, UK, April 2000.
  22. W. Chan and B. Wellman, “The global digital divide—within and between countries,” IT & Society, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 39–45, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Hubregtse, “The digital divide within the European Union,” New Library World, vol. 106, no. 3-4, pp. 164–172, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Hao and S. Chao, “Factors affecting internet development: an Asian survey,” First Monday, vol. 9, no. 2, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Guðmundsdóttir, “Approaching the digital divide in South Africa,” in Proceedings of the NETREED Conference, Beitostølen, Norway, December 2005, http://www.netreed.uio.no/conferences/conf2005/GretaGudmundsdottir.pdf.
  26. Z. Xinhong, “The 2008 report of China’s digital divide,” Tech. Rep., Electronic Government, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  27. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper, “Has the Digital Divide Been Reversed? evidence from Five EU Countries,” 2013, http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC80782.pdf.
  28. S. P. Martin and J. P. Robinson, “The income digital divide: trends and predictions for levels of internet use,” Social Problems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Fallows, “China’s online population explosion; what it may mean for the Internet globally...and for the US. Pew Internet and American Life Project,” 2007, http://uploadi.www.ris.org/editor/1184918816China_Internet_July_2007.pdf.
  30. Digital divide: What It Is and Why It Matters, http://www.digitaldivide.org/dd/digitaldivide.html.
  31. M. J. Sanchez-Franco and J. L. Roldán, “Expressive aesthetics to ease perceived community support: exploring personal innovativeness and routinised behaviour as moderators in Tuenti,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1445–1457, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, and H.-D. Daniel, “The h index research output measurement: two approaches to enhance its accuracy,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. F. Guillén and S. L. Suárez, “Explaining the global digital divide: economic, political and sociological drivers of cross-national internet use,” Social Forces, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 681–708, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Flavián, M. Guinalíu, and R. Gurrea, “The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty,” Information and Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. Deutskens, K. de Ruyter, and M. Wetzels, “An assessment of equivalence between online and mail surveys in service research,” Journal of Service Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 346–355, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Flavián, R. Gurrea, and C. Orús, “The effect of product presentation mode on the perceived content and continent quality of web sites,” Online Information Review, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1103–1128, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Zeng and G. Salvendy, “How creative is your website,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AEI '08), vol. 1, pp. 1–10, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, 2008.
  38. R. Pak, S. Pautz, and R. Iden, “Information organization and retrieval: an assessment of taxonomical and tagging systems,” Cognitive Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  39. D. G. Campbell, “A phenomenological framework for the relationship between the Semantic Web and user-centered tagging systems,” in Proceedings of the 17th ASIST Classification Research Workshop, Advances in Classification Research, J. Furner and J. T. Tennis, Eds., vol. 17, pp. 1–17, Austin, Tex, USA, 2006.
  40. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, “User experience—a research agenda,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. E. Kipp, “Complementary or discrete contexts in online indexing? A comparison of user, creator, and intermediary keywords,” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 419–436, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. J. Wang, M. D. Hernandez, and M. S. Minor, “Web aesthetics effects on perceived online service quality and satisfaction in an e-tail environment: the moderating role of purchase task,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 63, no. 9-10, pp. 935–942, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Anderson, What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education, 2007, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.
  44. L. Zeng, G. Salvendy, and M. Zhang, “Factor structure of web site creativity,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 568–577, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Miller, Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.
  46. R. E. Petty, D. T. Wegener, and L. R. Fabrigar, “Attitudes and attitude change,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 609–647, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1996.
  48. T. L. Saaty, Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1998.
  49. J. Sauer and A. Sonderegger, “The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 670–677, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Sharit, S. J. Czaja, S. Nair, and C. C. Lee, “Effects of age, speech rate, and environmental support in using telephone voice menu systems,” Human Factors, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 234–251, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. R. Millen, J. Feinberg, and B. Kerr, “Dogar: social bookmarking in the enterprise,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction, pp. 111–120, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  52. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  53. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  54. S. H. Chen, H. T. Lin, and H. T. Lee, “Enterprise partner selection for vocational education: analytical network process approach,” International Journal of Manpower, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 643–655, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. S. Yang, W. L. Hung, and S. J. Chang-Chien, “On a similarity measure between LR-type fuzzy numbers and its application to database acquisition,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1001–1016, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. Ju-Long, “Control problems of grey systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 288–294, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Deng, “Grey entropy and grey target decision making,” Journal of Grey System, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. E. Pullman and M. A. Gross, “Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors,” Decision Sciences, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 551–576, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. N. Dalkey and O. Helmer, “An experimental application of the Delphi: method to the use of experts,” Management Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 458–467, 1963. View at Google Scholar