Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 359606, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/359606
Research Article

Sensitivity Analysis of Unsteady Flow Fields and Impact of Measurement Strategy

1Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
2Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan

Received 5 March 2014; Revised 23 June 2014; Accepted 24 June 2014; Published 20 July 2014

Academic Editor: Bo Yu

Copyright © 2014 Takashi Misaka and Shigeru Obayashi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Kalnay, Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  2. T. Hayase, K. Nisugi, and A. Shirai, “Numerical realization for analysis of real flows by integrating computation and measurement,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 47, no. 6-7, pp. 543–559, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. T. Misaka, S. Obayashi, and E. Endo, “Measurement-integrated simulation of clear air turbulence using a four-dimensional variational method,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1217–1219, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Misaka, S. Obayashi, I. Yamada, and Y. Okuno, “Assimilation experiment of lidar measurements for wake turbulence,” JSME Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 512–518, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Kato and S. Obayashi, “Statistical approach for determining parameters of a turbulence model,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION '12), pp. 2452–2457, Singapore, September 2012. View at Scopus
  6. T. Misaka, F. Holzäpfel, and T. Gerz, “Wake evolution of high-lift configuration from roll-up to vortex decay,” in Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-0362, January 2013. View at Scopus
  7. R. Kikuchi, T. Misaka, and S. Obayashi, “Estimation of low-level turbulence utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition and particle filter,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION '13), Istanbul, Turkey, July 2013.
  8. E. N. Lorenz, “Predictability: a problem partly solved,” in Proceedings of the Seminar on Predictability of Weather and Climate (ECMWF '96), vol. 1, pp. 1–18, 1996.
  9. E. N. Lorenz and K. A. Emanuel, “Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: simulation with a small model,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 399–414, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Boffetta, P. Giuliani, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani, “An extension of the Lyapunov analysis for the predictability problem,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 55, no. 23, pp. 3409–3416, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. A. Carrassi, A. Trevisan, and F. Uboldi, “Adaptive observations and assimilation in the unstable subspace by breeding on the data-assimilation system,” Tellus A, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 101–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. N. Daescu and I. M. Navon, “Sensitivity analysis in nonlinear variational data assimilation: theoretical aspects and applications,” in Advanced Numerical Methods for Complex Environmental Models: Needs and Availability, I. Farago, A. Havasi, and Z. Zlatev, Eds., pp. 276–300, Bentham Science Publishers, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. N. Daescu, “On the sensitivity equations of four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 3050–3065, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. J. Hossen, I. M. Navon, and D. N. Daescu, “Effect of random perturbations on adaptive observation techniques,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 110–123, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Gao, G. Jin, H. Chen, and X. Lv, “Estimation of open boundary conditions based on an isopycnic-coordinate internal tidal model with adjoint assimilation method,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 321387, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. H. Chen, C. Miao, and X. Lv, “Estimation of open boundary conditions for an internal tidal model with adjoint method: a comparative study on optimization methods,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 802136, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. A. Cao, H. Chen, J. Zhang, and X. Lv, “Optimization of open boundary conditions in a 3D internal tidal model with the adjoint method around Hawaii,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 950926, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Lakshmivarahan and J. M. Lewis, “Forward sensitivity approach to dynamic data assimilation,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2010, Article ID 375615, 12 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. Y. Morinishi, T. S. Lund, O. V. Vasilyev, and P. Moin, “Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 90–124, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. J. H. Williamson, “Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 48–56, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. C. Meneveau, T. S. Lund, and W. H. Cabot, “A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 319, pp. 353–385, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. T. Misaka, F. Holzäpfel, I. Hennemann, T. Gerz, M. Manhart, and F. Schwertfirm, “Vortex bursting and tracer transport of a counter-rotating vortex pair,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 24, no. 2, Article ID 025104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Ide, P. Courtier, M. Ghil, and A. C. Lorenc, “Unified notation for data assimilation: operational, sequential and variational,” Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, vol. 75, pp. 181–189, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. M. Averick and J. J. More, “Evaluation of large-scale optimization problems on vector and parallel architectures,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 708–721, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. F. Veersé, D. Auroux, and M. Fisher, “Limited-memory BFGS diagonal preconditioners for a data assimilation problem in meteorology,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 323–339, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet