Research Article
A Schedule Optimization Model on Multirunway Based on Ant Colony Algorithm
Table 7
The comparison between initial flight delay cost and the optimized flight delay cost.
| | Flight number | Type | Unit delay cost of departure | Estimated
time of departure | Actual
time of departure | Departure
runway | Delay cost of actual departure | Optimal
Departure time | Departure
runway after optimization | Departure delay cost after optimization |
| | H1F001 | S | 1.2 | 0:00:00 | 0:00:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:18:30 | 0 | 1332 | | H2F002 | S | 1.1 | 0:00:00 | 0:01:36 | 0 | 105.6 | 0:08:50 | 1 | 583 | | H2F003 | L | 6.2 | 0:00:00 | 0:02:42 | 0 | 1004.4 | 0:11:58 | 0 | 4451.6 | | H3F004 | M | 2.4 | 0:00:00 | 0:00:00 | 1 | 0 | 0:03:10 | 0 | 456 | | H4F005 | M | 2.5 | 0:05:00 | 0:04:20 | 0 | −100 | 0:14:54 | 0 | 1485 | | H4F006 | S | 1.4 | 0:05:00 | 0:08:29 | 1 | 292.6 | 0:22:20 | 1 | 1456 | | H5F007 | M | 2.4 | 0:05:00 | 0:09:35 | 1 | 660 | 0:11:12 | 1 | 892.8 | | H6F008 | M | 2.6 | 0:05:00 | 0:08:42 | 0 | 577.2 | 0:27:30 | 1 | 3510 | | H6F009 | L | 5.7 | 0:10:00 | 0:17:41 | 0 | 2627.7 | 025:44 | 0 | 5380.8 | | H3F010 | M | 2.4 | 0:10:00 | 0:19:07 | 1 | 1312.8 | 0:26:16 | 1 | 2342.4 | | H1F011 | M | 2.3 | 0:10:00 | 0:20:23 | 1 | 1432.9 | 0:22:56 | 0 | 1784.8 | | H2F012 | L | 6.2 | 0:10:00 | 0:18:59 | 0 | 3341.8 | 0:24:10 | 0 | 5270 | | H7F013 | M | 2.7 | 0:10:00 | 0:20:37 | 0 | 1719.9 | 0:16:50 | 1 | 1107 | | H5F014 | S | 1.3 | 0:15:00 | 0:25:11 | 1 | 794.3 | 0:19:08 | 1 | 322.4 | | H2F015 | M | 2.6 | 0:15:00 | 0:25:15 | 0 | 1599 | 0:13:44 | 1 | −197.6 | | H7F016 | M | 2.7 | 0:15:00 | 0:26:17 | 1 | 1827.9 | 0:25:02 | 1 | 1625.4 | | H3F017 | S | 1 | 0:15:00 | 0:27:15 | 0 | 735 | 0:21:42 | 0 | 402 | | H1F018 | L | 5.1 | 0:15:00 | 0:27:33 | 1 | 3840.3 | 0:10:24 | 0 | −1407.6 |
| | Flight number | Type | Unit delay cost of approach | Estimated
time of approach | Actual
time of approach | Approach runway | Delay cost of actual approach | Optimal
Approach time | Approach
runway after optimization | Approach delay cost after optimization |
| | H7F019 | L | 62.6 | 0:00:00 | 0:01:14 | 1 | 4632.4 | 0:06:00 | 0 | 22536 | | H7F020 | S | 25.6 | 0:01:12 | 0:04:01 | 1 | 4326.4 | 0:23:56 | 1 | 34918.4 | | H7F021 | M | 42.8 | 0:02:32 | 0:05:15 | 1 | 6976.4 | 0:02:28 | 1 | −171.2 | | H5F022 | L | 63.2 | 0:03:56 | 0:04:16 | 0 | 1264 | 0:13:16 | 0 | 35392 | | H4F023 | M | 41.5 | 0:04:02 | 0:06:29 | 1 | 6100.5 | 0:03:42 | 1 | −830 | | H6F024 | M | 41.6 | 0:04:31 | 0:06:10 | 0 | 4118.4 | 0:06:50 | 1 | 5782.4 | | H7F025 | S | 25.6 | 0:05:06 | 0:11:53 | 1 | 10419.2 | 0:15:44 | 1 | 16332.8 | | H3F026 | M | 42 | 0:05:34 | 0:09:56 | 0 | 11004 | 0:07:54 | 0 | 5880 | | H7F027 | M | 42.8 | 0:05:42 | 0:11:10 | 0 | 14038.4 | 0:00:00 | 1 | −14637.6 | | H1F028 | M | 42.4 | 0:06:54 | 0:13:07 | 1 | 15815.2 | 0:12:28 | 1 | 14161.6 | | H7F029 | L | 62.6 | 0:07:01 | 0:12:24 | 0 | 20219.8 | 0:00:00 | 0 | −26354.6 | | H7F030 | L | 62.6 | 0:07:34 | 0:14:21 | 1 | 25478.2 | 0:04:56 | 1 | −9890.8 | | H4F031 | M | 41.5 | 0:08:03 | 0:16:15 | 1 | 20418 | 0:09:56 | 1 | 4689.5 | | H3F032 | S | 24.7 | 0:08:43 | 0:15:11 | 0 | 9583.6 | 0:20:44 | 1 | 17808.7 | | H5F033 | L | 63.2 | 0:09:12 | 0:17:29 | 1 | 31410.4 | 0:04:26 | 0 | −18075.2 | | H3F034 | M | 42 | 0:09:51 | 0:16:25 | 0 | 16548 | 0:01:54 | 0 | −20034 | | H6F035 | M | 41.6 | 0:10:13 | 0:21:37 | 1 | 28454.4 | 0:09:08 | 0 | −2704 | | H1F036 | M | 42.4 | 0:10:14 | 0:21:51 | 0 | 29552.8 | 0:01:14 | 1 | −22896 | | H2F037 | L | 63 | 0:11:06 | 0:22:51 | 1 | 44415 | 0:16:10 | 0 | 19152 | | H1F038 | S | 25 | 0:12:53 | 0:24:09 | 0 | 16900 | 0:20:06 | 0 | 10825 |
|
|
Total: the total cost of the initial flight sequence delay is 343446.5/CNY; the total cost of optimized flight sequence delay is 102681.0/CNY.
|
