Research Article

An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Single-Machine Inverse Scheduling Problem

Table 1

Test results of SMISP.

Scenario numberNumber of jobsRPDPRCS   The adjustment of
  parameter values
Computational time (ms)
GAIGAGAIGAGAIGAGAIGA

12062.4%53.7%6.5%10.6%181384707859
25048.8%41.1%4.96%5.3%44401545010419
310021.1%10.0%3.25%4.28%86835166145638
42035.5%30.9%6.4%10.6%191299079005
55031.4%27.6%4.1%14.3%43411627514075
610033.6%20.5%2.2%3.2%84642404522090
72073.3%65.1%4.7%5.1%171295128512
85048.4%39.6%1.5%7.8%42401441213902
910029%12.8%1.5%10.9%85782441823398
102044.3%34.7%1.3%2.7%181393208464
115046.4%41.9%1.3%9.1%44311522614027
1210013.9%9.8%−1.7%2.2%848396688874
132072.7%69.5%0.9%2.1%191395158627
145047.4%37.1%−0.9%1.1%44352692825095
1510032.1%12.8%−6.1%4.9%84682357822639
162057.2%46.2%0.4%3.7%191486677706
175042.1%36.6%0.09%1.5%44401290412845
1810015.7%12.6%1.3%1.6%84763843837564
192081%72.7%1.2%2.8%191282977084
205026.5%18.9%2.8%3.6%44431271511915
2110022.1%10.1%3.1%9.4%83791930118357
222063.8%55.7%1.4%3.9%181582907843
235022.2%20.1%−1.1%2.9%42322397722757
2410017.4%14.5%0.9%3.05%83752047318809
252026.4%21.8%6.0%7.9%191594378438
265038.6%29.6%−1.7%0.2%44421442513405
2710014.6%12.7%2.2%3.9%85672293121893

Average39.6%31.8%1.72%5.13%48.742.0717342.215971.8