Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 462705, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/462705
Research Article

Allocating Tradable Emissions Permits Based on the Proportional Allocation Concept to Achieve a Low-Carbon Economy

1School of Business, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
2Department of Electronics and Information, Toyota Technological Institute, Nagoya 468-8511, Japan
3Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received 17 December 2013; Accepted 19 March 2014; Published 16 April 2014

Academic Editor: Xiaodong Lin

Copyright © 2014 Qianzhi Dai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. H. Goulder, “Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 29, no. 31, pp. 271–297, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. J. Bor and Y. Huang, “Energy taxation and the double dividend effect in Taiwan's energy conservation policy-an empirical study using a computable general equilibrium model,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2086–2100, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. J. Baumol and W. E. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
  4. A. D. Ellerman, “A note on tradeable permits,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Marciano, “Ronald Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost” and the Coase Theorem: an anniversary celebration,” European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Lozano, G. Villa, and R. Brännlund, “Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 752–760, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. A. Dixit and M. Olson, “Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem?” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 309–335, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. D. McKelvey and T. Page, “Taking the Coase Theorem seriously,” Economics and Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 235–247, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Boemare and P. Quirion, “Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences,” Ecological Economics, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 213–230, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Burtraw and K. Palmer, “Compensation rules for climate policy in the electricity sector,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 819–847, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Burtraw, D. Kahn, and K. Palmer, “CO2 allowance allocation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and the effect on electricity investors,” Electricity Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 79–90, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Zetterberg, M. Wråke, T. Sterner, C. Fischer, and D. Burtraw, “Short-run allocation of emissions allowances and long-term goals for climate policy,” Ambio, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Åhman, D. Burtraw, J. Kruger, and L. Zetterberg, “A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1718–1730, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Neuhoff, K. Keats Martinez, and M. Sato, “Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector,” Climate Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73–91, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Cramton and S. Kerr, “Tradeable carbon permit auctions how and why to auction not grandfather,” Energy Policy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 333–345, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. K. Kouakou, “Economic growth and electricity consumption in Cote d'Ivoire: evidence from time series analysis,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3638–3644, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Fischer, I. W. H. Parry, and W. A. Pizer, “Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 523–545, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. K. Binmore and P. Klemperer, “The biggest auction ever: the sale of the British 3G telecom licences,” Economic Journal, vol. 112, no. 478, pp. C74–C96, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. W. H. Parry, R. C. Williams III, and L. H. Goulder, “When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 52–84, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Wefky, F. Espinosa, L. de Santiago, P. Revenga, J. L. Lazaro, and M. Martinez, “Electrical drive radiated emissions estimation in terms of input control using extreme learning machines,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 790526, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. M. Elaiw, X. Xia, and A. M. Shehata, “Minimization of fuel costs and gaseous emissions of electric power generation by model predictive control,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 906958, 15 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. Wei and B. Xin, “Governance mechanism for global greenhouse gas emissions: a stochastic differential game approach,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 312585, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. D. Bertsimas, V. F. Farias, and N. Trichakis, “The price of fairness,” Operations Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Si, L. Liang, G. Jia, L. Yang, H. Wu, and Y. Li, “Proportional sharing and DEA in allocating the fixed cost,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 12, pp. 6580–6590, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Lin, “Allocating fixed costs and common revenue via data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 7, pp. 3680–3688, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, N. Shoja, and M. Sanei, “An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 267–274, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, and M. Moradi, “A DBA approach for fair allocation of common revenue,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 719–724, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Li, M. Yang, Y. Chen, Q. Dai, and L. Liang, “Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, “Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2171–2178, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. D. Cook and M. Kress, “Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a DEA approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 652–661, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. E. Beasley, “Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 198–216, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Li, F. Yang, L. Liang, and Z. Hua, “Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: a DEA approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 389–401, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. T. Pastor, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “A statistical test for nested radial DEA models,” Operations Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 728–735, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus