Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 478081, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/478081

## Optimal Control of a Nonlinear Time-Delay System in Batch Fermentation Process

School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Yantai 264005, China

Received 24 March 2014; Accepted 30 May 2014; Published 1 July 2014

Academic Editor: Zhan Shu

Copyright © 2014 Yongsheng Yu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The main control goal in batch process is to get a high yield of products. In this paper, to maximize the yield of 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD) in bioconversion of glycerol to 1,3-PD, we consider an optimal control problem involving a nonlinear time-delay system. The control variables in this problem include the initial concentrations of biomass and glycerol and the terminal time of the batch process. By a time-scaling transformation, we transcribe the optimal control problem into a new one with fixed terminal time, which yields a new nonlinear system with variable time-delay. The gradients of the cost and constraint functionals with respect to the control variables are derived using the costate method. Then, a gradient-based optimization method is developed to solve the optimal control problem. Numerical results show that the yield of 1,3-PD at the terminal time is increased considerably compared with the experimental data.

#### 1. Introduction

Batch processing represents the natural way to scale-up processes from the laboratory to the production environment [1]. During the batch operation, no substrate is added to the initial charge and no product is removed until the end of the process [2]. Optimal control of batch processes has received attention recently because it is a choice for reducing production costs, improving product quality, and meeting safety requirements [3–5].

1,3-Propanediol (1,3-PD) is one of the important products used in the chemical industry. Using glycerol for producing 1,3-PD is effective from both the economical and ecological point of view. The operations of glycerol bioconversion to 1,3-PD consist of batch, continuous, and fed-batch cultures. Compared with continuous and fed-batch cultures, glycerol fermentation in batch process can obtain the highest production concentration and molar yield 1,3-PD to glycerol [6]. For this process, many studies have been carried out including the quantitative description of the cell growth kinetics [7, 8], enzyme-catalytic kinetics [9], the parameter identification problem [10–13], and the pathway optimization problem [14]. In particular, considering the existence of time-delays in the fermentation process [15, 16], a nonlinear time-delay system was recently proposed in [13]. Numerical simulations showed that the nonlinear time-delay system can describe the batch process better than previous mathematical models. However, in batch process of glycerol bioconversion to 1,3-PD, the aim is to obtain as much 1,3-PD as possible at the terminal time. Mathematically, this is an optimal control problem. Although the achieved results are interesting, such optimal control problem is ignored in the above researches.

In this paper, taking the initial concentrations of biomass and glycerol and the terminal time of the fermentation process as control variables and the yield of 1,3-PD as the performance index, we propose an optimal control model involving nonlinear time-delay system in [13] and subject to continuous state constraints. In fact, this problem is a free time delayed optimal control problem. By the way, there has been a mounting interest in optimal control of time-delay systems. A maximum principle for optimal control problem with a constant delay was provided in [17]. It should, however, be noted that many time-delay systems including the nonlinear time-delay system in this paper are highly nonlinear. Therefore, it is often impossible to obtain analytical solutions of the delayed optimal control problem and one has to resort to numerical solution methods. As a result, some successful algorithms, such as iterative dynamic programming method [18], control parameterization method [19], and measure theoretical approach [20], have been developed. However, terminal time in above optimal control problems is fixed. The presence of free terminal time makes the delayed optimal control problem much more complicated. Thus, to solve the optimal control problem in this work, these existing computational methods cannot be used directly and new computational techniques should be explored.

In this paper, by a time-scaling transformation, we equivalently transcribe the free time delayed optimal control problem into one with fixed terminal time. It is significant to mention that this transformation yields a more complex dynamic system in which the time-delays are variable. By the costate method, we derived the gradients of the cost functional and constraints with respect to the control variables. Then, a gradient-based optimization technique is developed. Finally, numerical results show that the yield of 1,3-PD at the terminal time is increased considerably compared with the experiment data.

#### 2. Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems

In batch process, a proper quantity of biomass and glycerol is added to the reactor only once and stirred uniformly under given conditions. Then, 1,3-PD is removed at the end of the process. Based on the work [13], the following nonlinear time-delay system can be used to describe the batch process: where is the state vector whose components are, respectively, the concentrations of biomass, glycerol, 1,3-PD, acetate, and ethanol in the reactor at time ; is a delay argument; is the terminal time; is the initial state; is a given initial function; and the dynamics of the batch process is given by In (2), the specific growth rate of cells , the specific consumption rate of substrate , and the specific formation rates of products , , can be expressed as where , , , and are kinetic parameters and and are the critical concentrations for cells growth.

The terminal time in system (1) is a control variable. Define
where and are the lower and upper bounds for the terminal time, respectively. Any is called an* admissible terminal time*. Moreover, since no product comes into being at the initial point, . Hence, let and define
where and are real numbers such that . Any is called an* admissible initial vector of biomass and glycerol*.

For the nonlinear time-delay system (1), there exists a unique continuous solution corresponding to each on [21]. Furthermore, there exist critical concentrations of biomass, glycerol, and products, outside which cells cease to grow. Hence, it is biologically meaningful to restrict the concentrations of biomass, glycerol, and products within a set defined as

#### 3. Optimal Control Problems

In the batch process, it is desired that the yield of 1,3-PD should be maximized at the end of the process. This is achieved by manipulating some control variables and . Thus, the optimal control problem in batch process can be formulated as

Note that (OCP) is of nonstandard type because the terminal time and the initial values of biomass and glycerol are variables to be determined. Thus, the (OCP) is actually a free time optimal control problem. It is difficult to solve the (OCP) using existing numerical techniques [18–20]. The main difficulty is the implicit dependence of the system state on the terminal time. We now employ a time-scaling transformation from to as follows: where is a new time variable. Clearly, corresponds to , and corresponds to . Let . Then The initial conditions become Thus, system (1) is transformed into the following form: Let denote the solution of system (11) corresponding to each on . Then, (OCP) can be transcribed into the following equivalently optimal control problem with fixed terminal time:

Note that the time-delay in system (11) depends on the control variable . Thus, when applied to time-delay systems, the time-scaling transformation (8) yields a more complex dynamic system in which the time-delay is variable.

#### 4. Computational Approaches

(EOCP) is in essence an optimization problem with continuous state inequality constraint (13), which has an infinite number of constraints and can be viewed as a semi-infinite programming problem. An efficient algorithm transforming this type of problems to standard mathematical programming problems was discussed in [22]. We will now briefly discuss the application of this algorithm to (EOCP).

Let
The continuous state constraint (13) becomes
where However, the equality constraint (15) is nondifferentiable at the points when . We replace (15) with the following inequality constraint:
where , , and
Thus, (EOCP) is approximated by a sequence of standard mathematical programming problems {()} defined by replacing constraint (15) with (16). Moreover, each of {()} can be solved by a gradient-based optimization method (e.g., sequential quadratic programming (SQP) [23]). However, this optimization method requires the gradients of the cost functional and constraints. Now, we will derive these required gradients using the so-called* costate method*, which is a commonly used technique in the optimal control domain [22, 24, 25].

Define The gradients of the cost functional defined in (12) with respect to the control variables are given in the following theorem.

Theorem 1. *Let . Then
**
where is the solution of the following costate system:**with the initial conditions
*

*Proof. *The derivations of the gradients of the cost functional with respect to and are similar. Thus, only the derivation of the gradient of the cost functional with respect to is given below.

Let be an arbitrary function that is continuous and differentiable almost everywhere. Then, we may express the cost functional as follows:
Applying integration by parts to the last integral term gives
Differentiating (24) with respect to yieldsPerforming a change of variable in the last term on the right-hand side of (25) gives
Substituting (26) into (25) yields
Choosing and substituting (21)-(22) into the above equation, we obtain the conclusion (19). The gradient formula (20) can be derived similarly. The proof is complete.

The gradients of the constraint defined in (16) with respect to the control variables are given in the next theorem.

Theorem 2. *Let . Then
**
where is the solution of the following costate system:
**
with the initial condition
*

*Proof. *The derivations of the gradients of the constraint with respect to and are similar. Thus, only the derivation of the gradient of the constraint with respect to is given below.

Let be an arbitrary function that is continuous and differentiable almost everywhere. Then, we may express the constraint as follows:
Applying integration by parts to the last integral term gives
Differentiating (33) with respect to yieldsPerforming a change of variable in the last term on the right-hand side of (34) gives
Substituting (35) into (34) yields
Choosing and substituting (30) and (31) into the above equation, we obtain the conclusion (28). The gradient formula (29) can be derived similarly. Thus, the proof is complete.

On the basis of Theorems 1 and 2, we can develop the following algorithm to solve the (OCP).

*Algorithm **1.*

*Step 1. *Choose initial values of , , , and .

*Step 2. *Solve () using SQP [23] to give ().

*Step 3. *Check feasibility of , for .

*Step 4. *If is feasible, then go to Step 5. Otherwise, set , where is a given positive constant. If , where is a prespecified positive constant, then go to Step 6. Otherwise, go to Step 2.

*Step 5. *Set , where is a given positive constant. If , then go to Step 2. Otherwise, go to Step 6.

*Step 6. *Output and stop.

At the conclusion of Steps 1–6, is an approximate optimal solution of the (OCP).

#### 5. Numerical Results

Algorithm 1 was applied to seek the optimal control variables in (OCP) and all computations were implemented in Fortran 6.5. We obtained that and h. Here, nonlinear time-delay system (1) was solved using the six-order Runge-Kutta method with Lagrange interpolation [26]. The time-delay h, the initial state , the initial function , the terminal time h, and the kinetic parameters and critical concentrations are listed in Table 1. In the optimization process, we assume that , , and . In addition, the smoothing and feasible parameters were initially selected as and . The parameters and were chosen as 0.1 and 0.01 until the solution obtained was feasible for the (OCP). The process terminated when and .

Under the obtained optimal control strategy, we obtained the optimal yield of 1,3-PD at the optimal terminal time is mmol h^{−1}, which is increased by 90.04% compared with experiment data [13]. Furthermore, we plotted the optimal yield change of 1,3-PD with respect to the fermentation time in Figure 1. From Figure 1, we can see that the yield of 1,3-PD at the terminal time is actually increased.

#### 6. Conclusion

In this paper, the optimal control problem in batch process was investigated. We presented the optimal control problem involving a nonlinear time-delay system and with free terminal time. We then transcribe the free time optimal control problem into a new one with fixed terminal time and variable time-delay. We developed a computational method based on the gradients of the cost and constraint functionals with respect to the control variables. Numerical results showed the effectiveness of the developed computational method.

#### Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

The supports of the Natural Science Foundation for the Youth of China (no. 11201267) and the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (no. ZR2011AL003) are gratefully acknowledged.

#### References

- D. Bonvin, “Optimal operation of batch reactors—a personal view,”
*Journal of Process Control*, vol. 8, no. 5-6, pp. 355–368, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - B. McNeil and L. M. Harvey,
*Practical Fermentation Technology*, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2008. - B. Srinivasan, S. Palanki, and D. Bonvin, “Dynamic optimization of batch processes I. Characterization of the nominal solution,”
*Computers and Chemical Engineering*, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. K. Nagy and R. D. Braatz, “Open-loop and closed-loop robust optimal control of batch processes using distributional and worst-case analysis,”
*Journal of Process Control*, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 411–422, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - L. Wang, Z. Xiu, Y. Zhang, and E. Feng, “Optimal control for multistage nonlinear dynamic system of microbial bioconversion in batch culture,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 2011, Article ID 624516, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - B. Gtinzel,
*Mikrobielle herstellung von 1, 3-propandiol durch Clostridium butyricum und adsorptive abtremutng von diolen, [Ph.D. thesis]*, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, 1991. - A. Zeng and W. Deckwer, “A kinetic model for substrate and energy consumption of microbial growth under substrate-sufficient conditions,”
*Biotechnology Progress*, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. Xiu, A. Zeng, and L. An, “Mathematical modelling of kinetics and research on multiplicity of glycerol bioconversion to 1,3-propanediol,”
*Journal of Dalian University of Technology*, vol. 40, pp. 428–433, 2000. View at Google Scholar - Y. Q. Sun, W. T. Qi, H. Teng, Z. L. Xiu, and A. P. Zeng, “Mathematical modeling of glycerol fermentation by Klebsiella pneumoniae: concerning enzyme-catalytic reductive pathway and transport of glycerol and 1,3-propanediol across cell membrane,”
*Biochemical Engineering Journal*, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. Wang, J. Ye, H. Yin, E. Feng, and L. Wang, “Sensitivity analysis and identification of kinetic parameters in batch fermentation of glycerol,”
*Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*, vol. 236, no. 9, pp. 2268–2276, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - L. Wang, Z. Xiu, Z. Gong, and E. Feng, “Modeling and parameter identification for multistage simulation of microbial bioconversion in batch culture,”
*International Journal of Biomathematics*, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID 1250034, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - J. Gao, L. Wang, E. Feng, and Z. Xiu, “Modeling and identification of microbial batch fermentation using fuzzy expert system,”
*Applied Mathematical Modelling*, vol. 37, no. 16-17, pp. 8079–8090, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - C. Liu, “Modelling and parameter identification for a nonlinear time-delay system in microbial batch fermentation,”
*Applied Mathematical Modelling*, vol. 37, no. 10-11, pp. 6899–6908, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - J. Yuan, X. Zhang, X. Zhu, E. Feng, and Z. Xiu, “Modelling and pathway identification involving the transport mechanism of a complex metabolic system in batch culture,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2088–2103, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - K. Menzel, A. Zeng, H. Biebl, and W. Deckwer, “Kinetic, dynamic, and pathway studies of glycerol metabolism by
*Klebsiella pneumoniae*in anaerobic continuous culture: I. The phenomena and characterization of oscillation and hysteresis,”*Biotechnology and Bioengineering*, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 549–560, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. Xiu, B. Song, L. Sun, and A. Zeng, “Theoretical analysis of effects of metabolic overflow and time delay on the performance and dynamic behavior of a two-stage fermentation process,”
*Biochemical Engineering Journal*, vol. 11, no. 2-3, pp. 101–109, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - G. L. Kharatishvili, “Maximum principle in the theory of optimal time-delay processes,”
*Doklady Akademii Nauk USSR*, vol. 136, pp. 39–42, 1961. View at Google Scholar - S. Dadebo and R. Luus, “Optimal control of time-delay systems by dynamic programming,”
*Optimal Control Applications and Methods*, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus - K. H. Wong, L. S. Jennings, and F. Benyah, “The control parametrization enhancing transform for constrained time-delayed optimal control problems,”
*The ANZIAM Journal*, vol. 43, pp. E154–E185, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - S. Barati, “Optimal control of constrained time delay systems,”
*Advanced Modeling and Optimization*, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn Lunel,
*Introduction to Functional-Differential Equations*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - K. L. Teo, G. J. Goh, and K. H. Wong,
*A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems*, Longman Scientific & Technical, 1991. - J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,
*Numerical Optimization*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at MathSciNet - R. Loxton, Q. Lin, and K. L. Teo, “Minimizing control variation in nonlinear optimal control,”
*Automatica*, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2652–2664, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - Q. Lin, R. Loxton, and K. L. Teo, “The control parameterization method for nonlinear optimal control: a survey,”
*Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 275–309, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. Stoer and R. Bulirsch,
*Introduction to Numerical Analysis*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet