Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 507401, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/507401
Research Article

The Dual Triple I Methods of FMT and IFMT

1College of Science, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
2College of Mathematics and Information Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China

Received 11 April 2014; Revised 5 June 2014; Accepted 11 June 2014; Published 7 July 2014

Academic Editor: Ker-Wei Yu

Copyright © 2014 Liu Yan and Zheng Mucong. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The Triple I method for the model of intuitionistic fuzzy modus tollens (IFMT) satisfies the local reductivity instead of the reductivity. In order to improve the quality of the Triple I method for lack of reductivity, the paper is intended to present a new approximate reasoning method for IFMT problem. First, the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator is proposed and its properties on the lattice structure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets are studied. Then, the dual Triple I method for FMT based on residual fuzzy difference operator is presented and the dual Triple I method is generated for IFMT. Moreover, a decomposition method of IFMT is provided. Furthermore, the reductivity of methods is investigated. Finally, α-dual Triple I method of IFMT is proposed.

1. Introduction

The real world is too complicated to be described precisely and it is full of uncertainty. It seems that humans have a remarkable capability to deal with the uncertain information. We need a theory to formulate human knowledge representation. The theory of fuzzy sets introduced by Zadeh [1] has been found to be useful to deal with uncertainty, imprecision, and vagueness of information. It is well known that the fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning are significant parts of the theory of fuzzy sets. To provide foundations for approximate reasoning with fuzzy propositions, the basic models of deductive processes with fuzzy sets, which were called the fuzzy modus pones (FMP) and the fuzzy modus tollens (FMT), were proposed in the seminal paper of Zadeh [2]. The basic reasoning principle was the composition rule of inference (CRI). Based on the CRI method, fuzzy reasoning has been successfully applied to a wide variety of fields [36].

In [7], Wang pointed out that the composition seems to lack logic foundation. For trying to provide a logic foundation for fuzzy reasoning, Wang proposed the full implication Triple I method (Triple I method for short). Triple I method has attracted the attention of many scholars and many results have been reported [714]. Pei [10] comprehensively investigated the method based on a class residual fuzzy implication derived from left-continuous t-norms. Liu and Wang [8] obtained a class restriction Triple I solution for FMP and FMT. For the formalization of the Triple I fuzzy reasoning, Wang [13] and Pei [11] considered the propositional logic system and the first order logic system, respectively.

From a knowledge representation point of view, however, the role of fuzziness is not always to capture uncertainty [15, 16]. The intuitionistic fuzzy sets introduced by Atanassov [17] is a pair of fuzzy sets, namely, a membership and a nonmembership function, which represent positive and negative aspects of the given information. It constitutes an appropriate knowledge representation framework.

The intuitionistic fuzzy set theory has been widely applied in many fields such as pattern recognition, machine learning, decision making, market prediction, and image processing [1823]. In order to construct the theoretical foundation of intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning, Cornelis et al. [2426] have made fruitful pioneering work. They presented the intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms [25]. In [24, 26], they concentrated on the intuitionistic fuzzy implication operator theory, and the CRI method of the intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning is discussed in [24]. However, because restrictions on the intuitionistic fuzzy implications are much more complicated than that of fuzzy implication operator, the Triple I method of the intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning has not been paid enough attention to. Zheng et al. [27] presented the Triple I method of intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning, proved the reductivity of the Triple I method for IFMP, and showed that the Triple I method of IFMT satisfied the local reductivity instead of the reductivity. In order to improve the quality of the Triple I method for lack of reductivity, we intend to propose the dual Triple I method of approximate reasoning for IFMT. First of all, we introduce the concepts of the intuitionistic fuzzy difference operators and coadjoint pair and provide the unified form of the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operators adjoint to intuitionistic t-conorms derived from the left-continuous t-norms. Secondly, we present the dual Triple I method of fuzzy reasoning for FMT and give the equivalence conditions between dual Triple I method and Triple I method. Lastly, we propose the dual Triple I method and the decomposition method of approximate reasoning for IFMT and discuss the reductivity of methods. Furthermore, -Triple I method of IFMT is proposed.

Throughout this paper, we denote , , , , , , and . stands for any index set. We denote by , the set of all fuzzy sets in and the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets, respectively.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some basic concepts and results, which we will need in the subsequent sections.

Definition 1 (see [28]). A triangular norm (t-norm for short) is a binary operation on satisfying commutativity, associativity, monotonicity, and boundary condition , . A triangular conorm (t-conorm for short) is a binary operation on satisfying commutativity, associativity, monotonicity, and boundary condition , .

The t-conorm is called the dual t-conorm of the norm if , and, analogously, the t-norm is called the dual t-norm of the conorm if , .

Definition 2 (see [28]). A t-norm is a left-continuous t-norm if for all and satisfies . A t-conorm is a right-continuous t-conorm if for all , satisfies .

Proposition 3 (see [28]). A t-norm is left-continuous if and only if the dual i-conorm of the t-norm is right-continuous.

Proposition 4 (see [29]). If is a left-continuous t-norm, then there exists a binary operation on such that satisfy the residual principle; that is, if and only if , where is given by and is called residual implication derived from .

Proposition 5 (see [30]). If is a right-continuous t-conorm then there exists a binary operation on such that forms a coadjoint pair; that is, if and only if , and is given by The coresiduum is called fuzzy difference operator derived from .

Definition 6 (see [27]). , , and are called associated operators of if is a adjoint pair, is a coadjoint pair, and is the dual -conorm of the norm .

Proposition 7 (see [27]). If , , and are associated operators of , then .

Example 8. The following are four important t-norms. The first three are all continuous t-norms, but the last one is left-continuous:(1)Gödel t-norm ,(2)Lukasiewicz t-norm ,(3)product t-norm ,(4) t-norm.Consider The associated operators of the above four t-norms are as follows, respectively:(1′)(2′)(3′) (4′)

Lemma 9. If , , then .

Lemma 10. If , , , then .

Definition 11 (see [17]). An intuitionistic fuzzy set on the nonempty universe of discourse is given by , where with the condition

and denote a membership function and a nonmembership function of to , respectively. It is clear that the intuitionistic fuzzy set in can be written as As a generalization of fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets extend the character value from to the triangle domain .

If , , then intuitionistic fuzzy sets degenerate into fuzzy sets. We denote by the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets in .

We can define a partial order on as follows:

Obviously, , , and , are the smallest element and the greatest element of , respectively. It is easy to verify the fact that is a complete lattice.

Definition 12 (see [27]). is called an intuitionistic t-norm derived from t-norm if and is called an intuitionistic t-conorm derived from t-norm if where is the dual t-conorm of the t-norm .

Proposition 13 (see [27]). is a commutative monoid and is isotone; is a commutative monoid and is isotone.

Proposition 14 (see [27]). Let be a left-continuous t-norm; then(1) derived from is a left-continuous intuitionistic t-norm on ; that is, ;(2) derived from is a right-continuous intuitionistic t-conorm on ; that is, .

Theorem 15 (see [27]). Let be an intuitionistic t-norm derived from a left-continuous t-norm ; then there exists a binary operation on such that and is given by

Definition 16 (see [27]). is called an intuitionistic adjoint pair if satisfy the residual principle (14), and is called a residual intuitionistic implication derived from a left-continuous if is an intuitionistic t-norm derived from a left-continuous .

Theorem 17 (see [27]). Let , , , and be a residual intuitionistic implication derived from a left-continuous t-norm ; then

3. The Triple I Method of IFMT

As one of the basic inference models of fuzzy reasoning, FMT has the following form: where , are the fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse and , are the fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse .

The Triple I principle is as follows:

should be the biggest fuzzy set on satisfying

Theorem 18 (see [10]). Let be a residual implication derived from a left-continuous t-norm; the expression of the Triple I solution for FMT problem (17) is as follows:

Theorem 19 (see [10, 14]). Let be a residual implication derived from a left-continuous t-norm and satisfy contrapositive symmetry; that is, ; then the expression of the Triple I solution for FMT problem (17) becomes

The Triple I method of approximate reasoning was extended from FMT to IFMT in [27]. IFMT has the same form as FMT as follows: where , are the intuitionistic fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; , are the intuitionistic fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; and is a residual intuitionistic fuzzy implication on . We denote , , , , , and . Clearly, , , and are the fuzzy sets on , respectively, and , , , , and are the fuzzy sets on , respectively.

Because is the residual intuitionistic fuzzy implication on , the extension of the Triple I principle is as follows:

should be the biggest intuitionistic fuzzy set on satisfying under the order of .

Theorem 20 (see [27]). Let the implication in IFMT be the residual implication derived from a left-continuous t-norm ; then the expression of the Triple I solution for IFMT problem (21) is as follows:

We know that the Triple I method of FMT possesses virtue of reductivity if satisfies the condition such that (see [10]). Unfortunately, the Triple I method of IFMT only possess the local reductivity instead of the reductivity (see [27]).

Theorem 21 (see [27]). Let the implication in IFMT be the residual implication derived from a left-continuous t-norm satisfying ; then the Triple I method is local reductive; that is, whenever satisfying such that .

Corollary 22 (see [27]). Let the implication in IFMT be the residual implication derived from Lukasiewicz t-norm or t-norm; then the Triple I method is local reductive; that is, whenever satisfying , .

Theorem 23 (see [27]). Let the implication in IFMT be the residual implication derived from Lukasiewicz t-norm; then the Triple I method is local reductive, that is, whenever satisfying , such that .

Theorem 24 (see [27]). Let the implication in IFMT be the residual implication derived from t-norm; then the Triple I method is local reductive; that is, whenever satisfying , such that .

4. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Difference Operator

In this section, we give the unified form of the adjoint operator for the intuitionistic t-conorm derived from a left-continuous t-norm.

Theorem 25. Let be an intuitionistic t-conorm derived from a left-continuous t-norm ; then there exists a binary operation on such that and is given by

Proof. By (25), if , then . Conversely, if , then . From the monotonicity of , . According to the left-continuity of , . Thus .

Definition 26. is called an intuitionistic coadjoint pair if satisfy the residual principle (24), and is called a residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm if is an intuitionistic t-conorm derived from a left-continuous t-norm .

Proposition 27. Suppose that is a residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm and is an intuitionistic coadjoint pair; then(1);(2);(3);(4);(5);(6);(7);(8);(9);(10) is isotone in the first variable and antitone in the second variable.

Theorem 28. Suppose that , , , and is a residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm ; then

Proof. Let and .
By Theorem 25,
For the first argument , it follows from Proposition 13 that .
For the second argument , so . Moreover, According to Theorem 25 Therefore, .

Example 29. The residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operators derived from Gödel t-norm, Lukasiewicz t-norm, product t-norm, and t-norm are as follows, respectively:(1)(2) (3)(4)

5. The Dual Triple I Method of FMT and IFMT

If we take the fuzzy difference operator instead of the fuzzy implication, then the model FMT has the following form: where , are the fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; , are the fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; and is a fuzzy difference operator.

The dual Triple I principle is as follows:

should be the biggest fuzzy set on satisfying

Remark 30. Because there are three fuzzy difference operators in formula (36), the dual Triple I method could be called Triple D method.

Theorem 31. Let be the fuzzy difference operator derived from a right-continuous t-conorm ; the expression of the Triple D solution of FMT problem (35) is as follows:

Proof. It follows from formula (37) that Since is the residual fuzzy difference operator, then That is, Suppose that is a fuzzy set on such that Since is the residual fuzzy difference operator, then That is, It follows from formula (37) that . Therefore, given by the formula (37) is the Triple D solution of IFMT.

Theorem 32. Let be the fuzzy difference operator derived from a right-continuous t-conorm ; then the Triple D solution of FMT given by (37) is reductive; that is, whenever satisfying such that .

Proof. It follows from (37) that if then . Because and is a coadjoint pair, then . Thus it follows from (37) that , . Moreover, if there exists such that , then it follows from formula (37) that . Therefore, .

Theorem 33. Suppose that , , and are associated operators of ; if satisfies contrapositive symmetry, then the Triple I solution is equivalent to the Triple D solution .

Proof. Since satisfies contrapositive symmetry, then by Theorem 19 and Proposition 7 Therefore, the Triple I solution is equivalent to the Triple D solution .

It is natural that the model IFMT can be transformed to the following form: where , are the intuitionistic fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; are the intuitionistic fuzzy sets on the nonempty universe of discourse ; and is a residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator on . We denote , , , , , and . Clearly, , , and are the fuzzy sets on , respectively, and , , , , , and are the fuzzy sets on , respectively.

The Triple D principle of IFMT is as follows:

should be the biggest intuitionistic fuzzy set on satisfying under the order of .

Theorem 34. Let be the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm; the expression of the Triple solution for IFMT problem (45) is as follows:

Proof. It is similar to the proof of Theorem 31.

Corollary 35. Suppose that is the intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm; then the Triple D solution of IFMT is given by the following formula: where

Proof. The proof is trivial by Theorems 28 and 34.

According to Corollary 35, we consider the Triple D solutions of the following two FMT problems and the Triple I solution of the following FMP problem:

Theorem 36. Suppose that and are the Triple D solutions of FMT problem (50) and (51), respectively, and is the Triple I solution of FMP problem (52); then where is the Triple D solution of IFMT problem (45) given by (49).

Proof. Obviously, from Theorem 31. It follows from formula (49) that Since , that is, , then That is, . Thus . The proof is completed.

Definition 37. is called the decomposition method solution of IFMT problem (45) if

Do the Triple D solution and the decomposition methods solution degenerate into the fuzzy sets if the intuitionistic fuzzy sets , , and degenerate into the fuzzy sets? The following theorem answers this question.

Theorem 38. If the intuitionistic fuzzy sets , , and in IFMT problem (45) degenerate into the fuzzy sets, then the Triple D solution and the decomposition methods solution accordingly degenerate into the fuzzy sets and coincide with the solution given by Theorem 31.

Proof. According to Theorem 38, we should only prove that . Since , , and degenerate into the fuzzy sets, then , , and . It follows from Proposition 27 and Corollary 35 that

Theorem 39. Let be the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm, then the Triple D solution of IFMT given by (47) is reductive; that is, whenever satisfying such that .

Proof. If , then It follows from Proposition 27 (13) that , so . On the other hand, . Thus .

It indicates that the Triple D method is more meaningful than the Triple I method in point of reductivity for IFMT.

We know that the Triple D method of FMT is reductive; it is easy to prove that the decomposition method of IFMT is reductive.

Theorem 40. Let be the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm; then the decomposition method solution of IFMT given by (56) is reductive; that is, whenever satisfying such that .

Taking into account being the smallest element of in the Triple D Principle of IFMT, we propose the Triple D principle as follows:

should be the biggest intuitionistic fuzzy set on satisfying under the order of where .

Theorem 41. Let be the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operator derived from a left-continuous t-norm; the expression of the Triple D solution for IFMT is as follows:

6. Conclusion

In [27], the Triple I method and the decomposition method of IFMP were first presented and the reductivity of methods were verified; however, it was confirmed that the Triple I method of IFMT satisfied the local reductivity instead of reductivity. In order to achieve the improvement of reductivity of Triple I method for IFMT, the Triple D method and the decomposition method of IFMT are presented and the reductivity of methods is proved. Moreover, the concepts of the intuitionistic fuzzy difference operators and coadjoint pair are proposed, and the unified form of the residual intuitionistic fuzzy difference operators adjoint to intuitionistic t-conorms derived from left-continuous t-norms is provided.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 11101253, 11301321, and 11301319) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. GK201403001).

References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. A. Zadeh, “Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Dubois, “The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: old techniques and new directions,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. C. Lee, “Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 405–435, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  5. E. H. Mamdani and B. R. Gaines, Fuzzy Reasoning and Its Applications, Academic Press, London, UK, 1981.
  6. L. X. Wang, A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1997.
  7. G. J. Wang, “Formalized theory of general fuzzy reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 160, pp. 251–266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. W. Liu and G. J. Wang, “Unified forms of fully implicational restriction methods for fuzzy reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 956–966, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. W. Pei, “On the strict logic foundation of fuzzy reasoning,” Soft Computing, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 539–545, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. W. Pei, “Unified full implication algorithms of fuzzy reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 520–530, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. W. Pei, “Formalization of implication based fuzzy reasoning method,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 837–846, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Song, C. Feng, and E. S. Lee, “Triple I method of fuzzy reasoning,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1567–1579, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. J. Wang, “Formalized theory of general fuzzy reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 160, pp. 251–266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. J. Wang and L. Fu, “Unified forms of Triple I method,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 5-6, pp. 923–932, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 192, pp. 3–24, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Franco, J. Montero, and J. T. Rodríguez, “A fuzzy and bipolar approach to preference modeling with application to need and desire,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 214, pp. 20–34, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications, Physica, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
  19. I. Bloch, “Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1031–1060, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. F. Li and C. T. Cheng, “New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 23, pp. 221–225, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. W. Liu, “New similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and between elements,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 61–70, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. W. Liu and G. J. Wang, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 220–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregating Theory and Its Application, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2008, (Chinese).
  24. C. Cornelis, G. Deschrijver, and E. E. Kerre, “Implication in intuitionistic fuzzy and interval-valued fuzzy set theory: construction, classification, application,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 55–95, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Deschrijver, C. Cornelis, and E. E. Kerre, “On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Deschrijver and E. E. Kerre, “Classes of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms satisfying the residuation principle,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 691–709, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. C. Zheng, Z. K. Shi, and Y. Liu, “Triple I method of approximate reasoning on Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1369–1382, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  28. E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap, Triangular Norms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.
  29. G. J. Wang, Introduction to Mathematical Logic and Resolution Principle, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2nd edition, 2006, (Chinese).
  30. M. C. Zheng and G. J. Wang, “Co-residuated lattice with application,” Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2005 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar