Research Article
Methodology for Supply Chain Integration: A Case Study in the Artisan Industry of Footwear
Table 2
Comparison of the results obtained after line balancing according to the modification of the simulation model.
| Parameter | Unbalanced system | Balanced System | Mean (minutes) | Standard deviation (minutes) | Mean (minutes) | Standard deviation (minutes) |
| Total manufacturing time (three products) | 1252.4 | 5.9 | 1121.1 | 7.2 | Product 1 | | | | | Manufacturing cycle | 591.4 | 7.2 | 550.3 | 4.2 | Cycle time (batch) | 22.0 | 0.2 | 20.1 | 0.1 | Product 2 | | | | | Manufacturing cycle | 469.8 | 3.0 | 417.5 | 2.4 | Cycle time (batch) | 21.0 | 0.2 | 19.8 | 0.1 | Product 3 | | | | | Manufacturing cycle | 457.0 | 3.0 | 392.0 | 1.8 | Cycle time (batch) | 21.0 | 0.1 | 19.0 | 0.2 |
| Parameter | Mean (%) | Standard deviation (%) | Mean (%) | Standard deviation (%) |
| Workers | | | | | Worker 1 | 63.3 | 0.4 | 81.5 | 0.5 | Worker 2 | 88.9 | 0.1 | 66.6 | 0.5 | Worker 3 | 74.2 | 0.5 | 67.9 | 0.6 | Worker 4 | 61.2 | 0.4 | 57.1 | 0.4 | Worker 5 | 46.8 | 0.8 | 66.6 | 0.5 | Worker 6 | 23.6 | 0.1 | 64.5 | 0.5 |
| Line efficiency | 56.0 | | 73.6 | |
|
|